CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

California Middle and High School Students Report Wanting Fresh and Healthy School Lunch in the Context of Universal School Meals

Chelius, Carolyn, Bacon, Kassandra A., Orta-Aleman, Dania, Zuercher, Monica D., Ritchie, Lorrene D., Cohen, Juliana F.W., Hecht, Christina E., Hecht, Kenneth, Gosliner, Wendi·2025·Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
DOI 10.1016/j.jneb.2025.01.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jneb.2025.01.006

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure. Findings that emerged from focus groups with California middle and high school students (n = 67) during the 2021 -2022 school year to assess students' perceptions of school lunch.
Figure. Findings that emerged from focus groups with California middle and high school students (n = 67) during the 2021 -2022 school year to assess students' perceptions of school lunch.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Kinderknecht, 2020, Association of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act with dietary quality among children in the US national school lunch program, JAMA, 324, 359, 10.1001/jama.2020.9517 · DOI
  2. Au, 2018, Eating school meals daily is associated with healthier dietary intakes: the healthy communities study, J Acad Nutr Diet, 118, 1474, 10.1016/j.jand.2018.01.010 · DOI
  3. Liu, 2021, Trends in food sources and diet quality among US children and adults, 2003–2018, JAMA Netw Open, 4, 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5262 · DOI
  4. Caruso, 2015, Quality and cost of student lunches brought from home, JAMA Pediatr, 169, 86, 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.2220 · DOI
  5. Everitt, 2020, Comparing diet quality of school meals versus food brought from home, Can J Diet Pract Res, 81, 179, 10.3148/cjdpr-2020-013 · DOI
  6. Mansfield, 2017, Effect of school wellness policies and the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act on food-consumption behaviors of students, 2006–2016: a systematic review, Nutr Rev, 75, 533, 10.1093/nutrit/nux020 · DOI
  7. Cullen, 2017, The contribution of the USDA school breakfast and lunch program meals to student daily dietary intake, Prev Med Rep, 5, 82, 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.11.016 · DOI
  8. Smith, 2021, Did the new school meal standards improve the overall quality of children's diets?, Appl Econ Perspect Policy, 43, 1366, 10.1002/aepp.13074 · DOI
  9. Johnson, 2016, Effect of the healthy hunger-free kids act on the nutritional quality of meals selected by students and school lunch participation rates, JAMA Pediatr, 170, 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.3918 · DOI
  10. Berger, 2020, Changes in association between school foods and child and adolescent dietary quality during implementation of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010, Ann Epidemiol, 47, 30, 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.05.013 · DOI
  11. Asada, 2017, High school students’ recommendations to improve school food environments: insights from a Critical Stakeholder Group, J Sch Health, 87, 842, 10.1111/josh.12562 · DOI
  12. Tsai, 2019, Student perception of healthfulness, school lunch healthfulness, and participation in school lunch: the healthy communities study, J Nutr Educ Behav, 51, 623, 10.1016/j.jneb.2019.01.014 · DOI
  13. Evans, 2021, Middle school stakeholder perceptions of school nutrition reform since the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010, Am J Health Educ, 52, 276, 10.1080/19325037.2021.1955226 · DOI
  14. Schwartz, 2015, New school meal regulations increase fruit consumption and do not increase total plate waste, Child Obes, 11, 242, 10.1089/chi.2015.0019 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Cohen, 2022, Implementation of universal school meals during COVID-19 and beyond: challenges and benefits for school meals programs in Maine, Nutrients, 14, 4031, 10.3390/nu14194031 · DOI
  16. Gagliano, 2023, Stop the shame and the hunger: the need for school meal program reform, Child Youth Serv Rev, 155, 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107245 · DOI
  17. Orta-Aleman, 2024, Students’ perspectives on the benefits and challenges of universal school meals related to food accessibility, stigma, participation, and waste, J Nutr Educ Behav, 56, 599, 10.1016/j.jneb.2024.04.011 · DOI
  18. O'Donnell, 2022, Barriers and facilitators to high school meal program participation: a qualitative study of students and their caregivers, J Sch Health, 92, 1186, 10.1111/josh.13229 · DOI
  19. Payán, 2017, Perceived barriers and facilitators to healthy eating and school lunch meals among adolescents: a qualitative study, Am J Health Behav, 41, 661, 10.5993/AJHB.41.5.15 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Chatterjee, 2016, “Can't we just have some sazón?” student, family, and staff perspectives on a new school food program at a Boston high school, J Sch Health, 86, 273, 10.1111/josh.12377 · DOI
  21. Samuels, 2010, The California endowment's healthy eating, active communities program: a midpoint review, Am J Public Health, 100, 2114, 10.2105/AJPH.2010.192781 · DOI
  22. Machado, 2020, The impact of a multi-pronged intervention on students’ perceptions of school lunch quality and convenience and self-reported fruit and vegetable consumption, Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17, 5987, 10.3390/ijerph17165987 · DOI
  23. Borkan, 2022, Immersion–crystallization: a valuable analytic tool for healthcare research, Fam Pract, 39, 785, 10.1093/fampra/cmab158 · DOI
  24. Krippendorff, 2004, Reliability in content analysis: some common misconceptions and recommendations, Hum Comm Res, 30, 411
  25. Lombard, 2002, Content analysis in mass communication: assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability, Hum Comm Res., 28, 587, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x · DOI · Paper page
  26. Gosliner, 2011, Would students prefer to eat healthier foods at school?, J Sch Health, 81, 146, 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2010.00573.x · DOI
  27. Zuercher, 2022, Providing school meals to all students free of charge during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: challenges and benefits reported by school foodservice professionals in California, Nutrients, 14, 3855, 10.3390/nu14183855 · DOI
  28. Harvey, 2018, Assessing school wellness policies and identifying priorities for action: results of a bi-state evaluation, J Sch Health, 88, 359, 10.1111/josh.12619 · DOI
  29. Harris, 2014, Food and beverage marketing in schools: putting student health at the head of the class, JAMA Pediatr, 168, 206, 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.5003 · DOI
  30. Zuercher M, Orta-Aleman D, Hecht CE, Hecht K, Ritchie LD, Gosliner W. School meals for all in California: government investments are associated with better meal operations, labor practices, and local food sourcing.https://ucanr.edu/sites/NewNutritionPolicyInstitute/files/397262.pdf. Accessed July 16, 2024. · DOI
  31. Watson, 2009, Evaluation of the nutrition knowledge, attitudes, and food consumption behaviors of high school students before and after completion of a nutrition course, Fam Consum Sci Res J, 37, 523, 10.1177/1077727X08329002 · DOI
  32. Pirouznia, 2001, The association between nutrition knowledge and eating behavior in male and female adolescents in the US, Int J Food Sci Nutr, 52, 127, 10.1080/09637480020027000-8 · DOI
  33. Partida, 2018, Attitudes toward nutrition and dietary habits and effectiveness of nutrition education in active adolescents in a private school setting: a pilot study, Nutrients, 10, 1260, 10.3390/nu10091260 · DOI
  34. Hason, 2015, Assessment of nutritional knowledge in high school students: a survey study: 1404, Off J Am Coll Gastroenterol ACG, 110, S607, 10.14309/00000434-201510001-01404 · DOI
  35. Jahn, 2018, Product reformulation and nutritional improvements after new competitive food standards in schools, Public Health Nutr, 21, 1011, 10.1017/S1368980017003445 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Ezennia, 2023, Water security experiences and water intake among elementary students at low-income schools: a cross-sectional study, Acad Pediatr, 23, 68, 10.1016/j.acap.2022.04.008 · DOI
  37. Kenney, 2015, Grab a cup, fill it up! An intervention to promote the convenience of drinking water and increase student water consumption during school lunch, Am J Public Health, 105, 1777, 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302645 · DOI
  38. Patel, 2011, Encouraging consumption of water in school and child care settings: access, challenges, and strategies for improvement, Am J Public Health, 101, 1370, 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300142 · DOI
  39. Patel, 2020, Drinking water in the United States: implications of water safety, access, and consumption, Annu Rev Nutr, 40, 345, 10.1146/annurev-nutr-122319-035707 · DOI
  40. Storhaug, 2017, Country, regional, and global estimates for lactose malabsorption in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2, 738, 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30154-1 · DOI
  41. Reisinger, 2022, Disrupted food supply chain's effect on school nutrition programs’ ability to meet USDA nutritional guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic, Journal of Child Nutrition & Management, 42, 10
  42. Norris, 2012, Interactive performance and focus groups with adolescents: the power of play, Res Nurs Health, 35, 671, 10.1002/nur.21509 · DOI
  43. Daniels, 2019, STEER: factors to consider when designing online focus groups using audiovisual technology in health research, Int J Qual Methods, 18, 10.1177/1609406919885786 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 8

Metadata

Authors
Chelius, C., Bacon, K. A., Orta-Aleman, D., Zuercher, M. D., Ritchie, L. D., Cohen, J. F. W., Hecht, C. E., Hecht, K., & Gosliner, W.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-05
Volume
57
Issue
5
Pages
374-384
ISSN
1499-4046
DOI
10.1016/j.jneb.2025.01.006
Cited by
8
References
5
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review