Predicting neuropsychological abnormalities in multiple sclerosis
Abstract
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is associated with MRI signal alteration and neuropsychological (NP) dysfunction. Screening tools have been developed to identify patients at high risk for these neurological complications of MS. One such measure, the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Screening Questionnaire (MSNQ), has well-established reliability and predictive validity. In this article, we report on the accumulated findings derived from 162 consecutive research participants and MS clinic attendees. Our data show significant correlation between both patient- and informant-report MSNQ and NP impairment. As shown previously, larger, and more significant correlations are found between informant-report MSNQs than with patient-report MSNQs. In addition, we find that the MSNQ predicts follow-up NP testing 51 weeks after baseline with a similar degree of association. Finally, the MSNQ is correlated with MRI measures of whole-brain lesion burden and atrophy, secondary progressive course, and vocational disability. We conclude that the MSNQ is reliable and valid for detecting neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric complications of MS.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cognition determines, to a considerable extent, one's social and professional success and the ability to live independently.
“Cognition determines, to a considerable extent, one's social and professional success and the ability to live independently (Audet, Hebert, Dubois, Rochette, & Mercier, 2007; Benedict & Zivadinov, 2006; Green, Kern, Braff, & Mintz, 2000).”
From Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive functioning in brain disorders: a meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Benedict & Zivadinov, 2006
Cites
Paced Auditory Serial-Addition Task: A Measure of Recovery from Concussion
Gronwall, D. M. A. (1977) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1977.44.2.367 · Cited by 2,395 · see citing works
Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis.: II. Impact on employment and social functioning
Rao, S. M., Leo, G. J., Ellington, L., Nauertz, T., Bernardin, L., & Unverzagt, F. (1991) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.41.5.692 · Cited by 890 · see citing works
Benedict, R. H. B., Wahlig, E., Bakshi, R., Fishman, I., Munschauer, F., Zivadinov, R., & Weinstock-Guttman, B. (2005) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2004.12.009 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Self-citationMiller, D. H., Albert, P. S., Barkhof, F., Francis, G., Frank, J. A., Hodgkinson, S., Lublin, F. D., Paty, D. W., Reingold, S. C., & Simon, J. (1996) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410390104 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
Structural brain abnormalities in multiple sclerosis patients with major depression
Feinstein, A., Roy, P., Lobaugh, N., Feinstein, K., O’Connor, P., & Black, S. (2004) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000110316.12086.0c · Cited by 294 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Neuropsychiatric disorders are common in MS [9,11,18,46], and increasingly, an association between brain atrophy and both mood disorder [47] and euphoria sclerotica [18] is recognized in the literature.”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Begemann, M. J., Brand, B. A., Ćurčić-Blake, B., Aleman, A., & Sommer, I. E. (2020) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291720003670 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
- Authors
- Benedict, R. H. B., & Zivadinov, R.
- Affiliations
- State University of New York (US)
- Venue
- Journal of the Neurological Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 245
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 67-72
- ISSN
- 0022-510X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066915179
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 2.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Biogen
- IC Design Education Center
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis, neuropsychological dysfunction, screening questionnaire, informant reports, patient reports, predictive validity, brain atrophy, secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, neuropsychiatric complications
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Cognition Disorders, Disability Evaluation, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Neuropsychological Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review