Cited by 115Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Non-invasive brain stimulation of the right inferior frontal gyrus may improve attention in early Alzheimer's disease: A pilot study

Eliasova, Ilona, Anderkova, Lubomira, Marecek, Radek, Rektorova, Irena·2014·Journal of the Neurological Sciences

Abstract

Introduction Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive tool for modulating cortical activity. Objectives In this pilot study, we evaluated the effects of high frequency rTMS applied over the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) on cognitive functions in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or incipient dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods Ten patients (6 men; 4 women, mean age of 72 ± 8 years; MMSE 23 ± 3.56) were enrolled in a randomized, placebo-controlled study with a crossover design. All participants received 2 sessions of 10 Hz rTMS over the non-dominant right hemisphere in random order: IFG (active stimulation site) and vertex (control stimulation site). Intensities were adjusted to 90% of resting motor threshold. A total of 2250 pulses were applied in a session. The Trail Making Test (TMT), the Stroop test, and the complex visual scene encoding task (CVSET) were administered before and immediately after each session. The Wilcoxon paired test was used for data analysis. Results Stimulation applied over the IFG induced improvement in the TMT parts A (p = 0.037) and B (p = 0.049). No significant changes were found in the Stroop test or the CVSET after the IFG stimulation. We observed no significant cognitive aftereffects of rTMS applied over the vertex. Conclusions High frequency rTMS of the right IFG induced significant improvement of attention and psychomotor speed in patients with MCI/mild dementia due to AD. Thi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jns.2014.08.036

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eliasova, I., Anderkova, L., Marecek, R., & Rektorova, I.
Affiliations
Central European Institute of Technology (CZ)
Venue
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
346
Issue
1-2
Pages
318-322
ISSN
0022-510X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2152682291
Cited by
115
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Regional Development Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, right inferior frontal gyrus, Alzheimer's disease, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, attention, high-frequency rTMS, non-invasive brain stimulation, psychomotor speed, Trail Making Test, Stroop task
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Attention, Cognition, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Pilot Projects, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review