Non-invasive brain stimulation of the right inferior frontal gyrus may improve attention in early Alzheimer's disease: A pilot study
Abstract
Introduction Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive tool for modulating cortical activity. Objectives In this pilot study, we evaluated the effects of high frequency rTMS applied over the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) on cognitive functions in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or incipient dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods Ten patients (6 men; 4 women, mean age of 72 ± 8 years; MMSE 23 ± 3.56) were enrolled in a randomized, placebo-controlled study with a crossover design. All participants received 2 sessions of 10 Hz rTMS over the non-dominant right hemisphere in random order: IFG (active stimulation site) and vertex (control stimulation site). Intensities were adjusted to 90% of resting motor threshold. A total of 2250 pulses were applied in a session. The Trail Making Test (TMT), the Stroop test, and the complex visual scene encoding task (CVSET) were administered before and immediately after each session. The Wilcoxon paired test was used for data analysis. Results Stimulation applied over the IFG induced improvement in the TMT parts A (p = 0.037) and B (p = 0.049). No significant changes were found in the Stroop test or the CVSET after the IFG stimulation. We observed no significant cognitive aftereffects of rTMS applied over the vertex. Conclusions High frequency rTMS of the right IFG induced significant improvement of attention and psychomotor speed in patients with MCI/mild dementia due to AD. Thi…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other adjacent regions were also stimulated across the included studies.
“However, we also found other (adjacent) regions to be stimulated across the included studies (e.g. Eliasova, Anderkova, Marecek, & Rektorova, 2014; Guse et al., 2013).”
From Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive functioning in brain disorders: a meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Eliasova, Anderkova, Marecek, & Rektorova, 2014
Cites
The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention
Weissman, D. H., Roberts, K. C., Visscher, K. M., & Woldorff, M. G. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1727 · Cited by 1,566 · see citing works
Executive "Brake Failure" following Deactivation of Human Frontal Lobe
Chambers, C. D., Bellgrove, M. A., Stokes, M. G., Henderson, T. R., Garavan, H., Robertson, I. H., Morris, A. P., & Mattingley, J. B. (2006) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892906775990606 · Cited by 544 · see citing works
Executive “Brake Failure” following Deactivation of Human Frontal Lobe
Chambers, C. D., Bellgrove, M. A., Stokes, M. G., Henderson, T. R., Garavan, H., Robertson, I. H., Morris, A. P., & Mattingley, J. B. (2006) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.3.444 · Cited by 544 · see citing works
Fractionating Attentional Control Using Event-Related fMRI
Hampshire, A., & Owen, A. M. (2005) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj116 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Dodds, C. M., Morein-Zamir, S., & Robbins, T. W. (2011) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq187 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Indiscriminate Amygdala Response to Mothers and Strangers After Early Maternal Deprivation
Olsavsky, A. K., Telzer, E. H., Shapiro, M., Humphreys, K. L., Flannery, J., Goff, B., & Tottenham, N. (2013) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.05.025 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Begemann, M. J., Brand, B. A., Ćurčić-Blake, B., Aleman, A., & Sommer, I. E. (2020) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291720003670 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Chou, Y.-H., Ton That, V., & Sundman, M. (2020) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.08.020 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
- Authors
- Eliasova, I., Anderkova, L., Marecek, R., & Rektorova, I.
- Affiliations
- Central European Institute of Technology (CZ)
- Venue
- Journal of the Neurological Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 346
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 318-322
- ISSN
- 0022-510X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2152682291
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 4.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Regional Development Fund
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Keywords
- repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, right inferior frontal gyrus, Alzheimer's disease, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, attention, high-frequency rTMS, non-invasive brain stimulation, psychomotor speed, Trail Making Test, Stroop task
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Attention, Cognition, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Pilot Projects, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review