Cited by 99Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorFace Recognition and PerceptionChild Welfare and Adoption

Indiscriminate Amygdala Response to Mothers and Strangers After Early Maternal Deprivation

Open access
Olsavsky, Aviva K., Telzer, Eva H., Shapiro, Mor, Humphreys, Kathryn L., Flannery, Jessica, Goff, Bonnie, Tottenham, Nim·2013·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background In altricial species, maternal stimuli have powerful effects on amygdala development and attachment-related behaviors. In humans, maternal deprivation has been associated with both "indiscriminate friendliness" toward non-caregiving adults and altered amygdala development. We hypothesized that maternal deprivation would be associated with reduced amygdala discrimination between mothers and strangers and increased parent report of indiscriminate friendliness behaviors.Methods Sixty-seven youths (33 previously institutionalized; 34 comparison; age-at-scan 4-17 years) participated in a functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment designed to examine amygdala response to mother versus stranger faces. In-scanner behavior was measured. Indiscriminate friendliness was assessed with parental report.Results Comparison youth showed an amygdala response that clearly discriminated mother versus stranger stimuli. Previously institutionalized youths, by contrast, exhibited reduced amygdala discrimination between mothers and strangers. Reduced amygdala differentiation correlated with greater reports of indiscriminate friendliness. These effects correlated with age-at-adoption, with later adoptions being associated with reduced amygdala discrimination and more indiscriminate friendliness.Conclusions Our results suggest that early maternal deprivation is associated with reduced amygdala discrimination between mothers and strangers, and reduced amygdala discrimination was associated with greater reports of indiscriminate friendliness. Moreover, these effects increased with age-at-adoption. These data suggest that the amygdala, in part, is associated with indiscriminate friendliness and that there might be a dose-response relationship between institutional rearing and indiscriminate friendliness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.05.025

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children adopted from institutions showed reduced amygdala discrimination between mothers and strangers compared with children with no history of institutional rearing or adoption.

    “Olsavsky et al (2013) used fMRI to demonstrate that children adopted from institutions showed reduced amygdala discrimination between mothers and strangers compared with children with no history of institutional rearing or adoption.”
  • Reductions in mother-stranger discriminations were moderately associated with indiscriminate behavior.

    “Reductions in mother-stranger discriminations were moderately associated with indiscriminate behavior.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [48]Tizard B Hodges J 1978 The effect of early institutional rearing on the development of eight year old children J Child Psychol Psychiatry 19 99 118 670339
  2. [49]Hodges J Tizard B 1989 Social and Family Relationships of Ex-Institutional Adolescents J Child Psychol Psyc 30 77 97 2925822
  3. [54]Talairach J Tournoux P 1988 Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain: an approach to medical cerebral imaging Stuttgart New York New York G. Thieme; Thieme Medical Publishers

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olsavsky, A. K., Telzer, E. H., Shapiro, M., Humphreys, K. L., Flannery, J., Goff, B., & Tottenham, N.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Olsavsky, Aviva K.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
74
Issue
11
Pages
853-860
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121807029
Cited by
99
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4
FWCI
15.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH091864)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
maternal deprivation, amygdala, face discrimination, institutionalized children, age at adoption, attachment, amygdala development, early rearing environment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affect, Amygdala, Brain Mapping, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Maternal Deprivation, Mothers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review