Utilization of construction and demolition waste for particleboard production
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Strength properties of produced particleboard containing up to 50% of waste wood mix are comparable to the one made from fresh wood particles and their values meet the standard of panel type P2.
“On the other hand, Azambuja et al. (2018b) proved that the strength properties of produced particleboard containing up to 50% of waste wood mix are comparable to the one made from fresh wood particles and their values meet the standard of panel type P2.”
From Production of wood-based panel from recycled wood resource: a literature review (2023) · cites this paper as Azambuja et al. (2018b)
Cites
Preliminary study for the management of construction and demolition waste
Kourmpanis, B., Papadopoulos, A., Moustakas, K., Stylianou, M., Haralambous, K. J., & Loizidou, M. (2008) · Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy · doi:10.1177/0734242x07083344 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Wood Waste—A Theoretical Framework Approach
Jahan, I., Zhang, G., Bhuiyan, M., & Navaratnam, S. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141710478 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Production of wood-based panel from recycled wood resource: a literature review
Nguyen, D. L., Luedtke, J., Nopens, M., & Krause, A. (2023) · European Journal of Wood and Wood Products · doi:10.1007/s00107-023-01937-4 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Building Materials Made of Wood Waste a Solution to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals
Maier, D. (2021) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma14247638 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“In the construction industry, more and more studies [28,29] are adhering to this challenge and focusing on the development of various solutions to better use construction [30] and demolition waste [9,31].”
Background
- Authors
- Azambuja, R. D. R., de Castro, V. G., Trianoski, R., & Iwakiri, S.
- Affiliations
- West Virginia University (US)
- Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Azambuja, Rafael da Rosa
- Venue
- Journal of Building Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 20
- Pages
- 488-492
- ISSN
- 2352-7102 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2884676921
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Building Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Council for Higher Education
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Food Sciences
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
- Keywords
- construction and demolition waste, particleboard, medium-density fiberboard, medium density particleboard, plywood, wood waste, MDF, non-destructive testing, internal bond strength, water absorption, thickness swelling, flexural strength, elastic modulus, waste recycling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review