Cited by 48Agricultural and Food SciencesRecycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials productionMaterials Engineering and Processing

Building Materials Made of Wood Waste a Solution to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals

Open access
Maier, Dorin·2021·Materials

Abstract

In order to reduce the impact of human activities on the environment, in 2015, the United Nations launched the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, proposing 17 Sustainable Development Goals with 169 associated targets. It is well-known that the construction industry is a major contributor to global CO2 emissions, and if a solution to reduce construction activity is not possible, considering the increasing population, then other solutions must be developed to decrease their negative environmental impact. In this context, the purpose of this paper is to investigate whether the use of wood waste as a building material can be a solution to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. The research procedure included a bibliometric literature search, a scientometric analysis and an in-depth discussion. The analysis was done with the help of the software VOSviewer and Bibliometrix; the data were extracted mainly from the ISI Web of Science database. The extraction of data was done using the PRISMA method, and thus a sample of 212 peer-reviewed journal articles was established. The main results indicate an increasing interest in this topic in the last several years, as well as a switch from considering wood waste as just a source to generate heat and energy to the use of wood waste as a building material. The main uses of wood waste as a building material are in the composition of particleboards and in various mortar and concrete mixtures. The field of wood waste has many potential directions towards future development, and if the immense treasure represented by the forests, and implicitly the wood, is used efficiently, it can be a good solution to the problem of sustainable development of society.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ma14247638

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CRD activities generate large volumes of waste, of which only 20% is recycled, with the rest ending up in landfills, including non-recyclable wood fractions.

    “Construction, renovation, and demolition (CRD) activities generate large volumes of waste, of which only 20% is recycled, with the rest ending up in landfills, including nonrecyclable wood fractions such as treated, tinted, and adhesive laden wood, and drywall containing gypsum [1][2][3].”

    From Pilot-Scale Slow Pyrolysis, Post-Heat Treatment, and Self-Heating Performance of Biochar Fuels Derived from Construction, Renovation, and Demolition (CRD) Wood Waste (2026) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Introduction describes construction and demolition waste as a large waste stream, and Section 3.4 discusses the disposal of wood waste in landfills. The paper does not give a 20% recycling rate or say that all remaining waste goes to landfills; it also does not identify the specified wood fractions as nonrecyclable. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]Maier D. Researchers approaches on innovation process in the construction sector Proceedings of the 34th International-Business-Information-Management-Association (IBIMA) Conference Madrid, Spain 13–14 November 2019 6816 6824

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maier, D.
Affiliations
Technical University of Cluj-Napoca (RO)
Corresponding author
Maier, Dorin
Venue
Materials
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-12-11
Volume
14
Issue
24
Pages
7638
ISSN
1996-1944 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200574510
Cited by
48
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
FWCI
9.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Food Sciences
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Materials Engineering and Processing
Keywords
wood waste, wood-based building materials, Sustainable Development Goals, particleboard, waste valorization, forest resources, sustainable construction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review