Cited by 87Bone health and osteoporosis researchBody Composition Measurement TechniquesClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Obesity increases precision errors in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements

Knapp, Karen M., Welsman, Joanne R., Hopkins, Susan J., Fogelman, Ignac, Blake, Glen M.·2012·Journal of Clinical Densitometry

Abstract

The precision errors of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements are important for monitoring osteoporosis. This study investigated the effect of body mass index (BMI) on precision errors for lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (NOF), total hip (TH), and total body (TB) bone mineral density using the GE Lunar Prodigy. One hundred two women with BMIs ranging from 18.5 to 45.9 kg/m(2) were recruited. Participants had duplicate DXA scans of the LS, left hip, and TB with repositioning between scans. Participants were divided into 3 groups based on their BMI and the percentage coefficient of variation (%CV) calculated for each group. The %CVs for the normal (<25 kg/m(2)) (n=48), overweight (25-30 kg/m(2)) (n=26), and obese (>30 kg/m(2)) (n=28) BMI groups, respectively, were LS BMD: 0.99%, 1.30%, and 1.68%; NOF BMD: 1.32%, 1.37%, and 2.00%; TH BMD: 0.85%, 0.88%, and 1.06%; TB BMD: 0.66%, 0.73%, and 0.91%. Statistically significant differences in precision error between the normal and obese groups were found for LS (p=0.0006), NOF (p=0.005), and TB BMD (p=0.025). These results suggest that serial measurements in obese subjects should be treated with caution because the least significant change may be larger than anticipated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jocd.2012.01.002

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knapp, K. M., Welsman, J. R., Hopkins, S. J., Fogelman, I., & Blake, G. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Knapp, Karen M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
315-319
ISSN
1094-6950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965614847
Cited by
87
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Densitometry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
obesity, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, measurement precision, coefficient of variation, body mass index, bone mineral density, osteoporosis monitoring, femoral neck, lumbar spine, total hip, least significant change
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Obesity, Osteoporosis, Reproducibility of Results, Absorptiometry, Photon, Comorbidity, Body Mass Index, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review