Cited by 51Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Association between apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism and depression

Feng, Fang, Lu, Shan-Shan, Hu, Cai-Yun, Gong, Feng-Feng, Qian, Zhen-Zhong, Yang, Hui-Yun, Wu, Yi-Le, Zhao, Yuan-Yuan +2 more·2015·Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

Abstract

We performed an updated meta-analysis to obtain a more precise estimation of the relationship between apolipoprotein E (ApoE) gene polymorphism and susceptibility to depression, as previous reports have been inconsistent. Twenty studies with 2286 depression patients and 3845 controls were included. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess the association between ApoE gene polymorphism and depression using a random effects model. Results showed a significant association between ApoE gene polymorphism and susceptibility to depression in the overall population (ε2/ε3 genotype versus ε3/ε3: OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59-0.99). Subgroup analyses indicated an association in the Caucasian population (ε2 allele versus ε3: OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.97) as well as in late-life depression (LLD) patients (ε3/ε4 genotype versus ε3/ε3: OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.07-1.68, and ε4 allele versus ε3: OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.06-1.59). We concluded that the ε2/ε3 genotype likely provided a protective effect against depression in the overall population and the ε2 allele acted as a protective factor for depression in the Caucasian population while the ε4 allele and ε3/ε4 genotype were associated with an increased risk of depression in the LLD subjects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.02.012

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feng, F., Lu, S.-S., Hu, C.-Y., Gong, F.-F., Qian, Z.-Z., Yang, H.-Y., Wu, Y.-L., Zhao, Y.-Y., Bi, P., & Sun, Y.-H.
Affiliations
Anhui Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Bi, Peng
Venue
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-08
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
1232-1238
ISSN
0967-5868 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138515429
Cited by
51
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ren Cai Xiang Mu Program of Anhui Provincial Higher Education Development Plan
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
apolipoprotein E, APOE polymorphism, depression, genetic susceptibility, geriatric depression, APOE ε2 allele, APOE ε4, protective effect, Caucasian population
MeSH terms
Alleles, Apolipoproteins E, Depression, Genotype, Humans, Polymorphism, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review