Cited by 48Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Do it yourself! Evaluation of self-help habit reversal training versus decoupling in pathological skin picking: a pilot study

Moritz, Steffen, Fricke, Susanne, Treszl, András, Wittekind, Charlotte E.·2012·Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jocrd.2011.11.001

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moritz, S., Fricke, S., Treszl, A., & Wittekind, C. E.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Venue
Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
41-47
ISSN
2211-3649 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019370788
Cited by
48
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders (publishedVersion)
Funders
Yale University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
habit reversal training, decoupling, self-help intervention, bibliotherapy, impulse control disorders, treatment efficacy, trichotillomania

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review