Cited by 187Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

The Skin Picking Impact Project: phenomenology, interference, and treatment utilization of pathological skin picking in a population-based sample

Tucker, Benjamin T.P., Woods, Douglas W., Flessner, Christopher A., Franklin, Shana A., Franklin, Martin E.·2011·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

The current study examined the characteristics of pathological skin picking (PSP) in a population-based sample. Participants were recruited through several online resources for PSP and related conditions to complete a web-based survey assessing the functional and topographical phenomenology, physical and psychosocial impact, treatment utilization, and associated psychopathology of PSP. A total of 1663 participants consented, of whom 760 were over 18 and met study criteria for PSP. Results showed considerable heterogeneity in picking methods, body sites, and function (e.g., regulation of emotional, sensory, and cognitive states). Participants generally reported moderate psychosocial and physical impact from picking and tended to perceive available treatment as poor in quality. Severity of associated symptoms of psychopathology (depression, anxiety, and stress) was comparable to severity levels found in previous samples of persons with trichotillomania and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Severity of PSP was a statistically significant predictor of overall impairment after controlling for depression and anxiety symptoms. Results suggest that PSP is a significant public health concern in need of further rigorous investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.08.007

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tucker, B. T. P., Woods, D. W., Flessner, C. A., Franklin, S. A., & Franklin, M. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Woods, Douglas W.
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
88-95
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098730022
Cited by
187
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
trichotillomania, obsessive-compulsive disorder, psychosocial impact, physical impact, treatment utilization, treatment quality, psychopathology, depression, anxiety, stress, functional disability, public health problem
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Skin, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review