CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 50Subcritical and Supercritical Water ProcessesThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sulfur conversion and distribution during supercritical water gasification of sewage sludge

Yan, Mi, Feng, Hongyu, Zheng, Rendong, Yu, Caimeng, Hantoko, Dwi, Zhou, Zhihao, Zhang, Yan, Kanchanatip, Ekkachai·2021·Journal of the Energy Institute
DOI 10.1016/j.joei.2021.01.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.joei.2021.01.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Otero, 2009, Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution by sewage sludge based sorbents: competitive effects, Desalination, 239, 46, 10.1016/j.desal.2008.03.005 · DOI
  2. Liu, 2019, Recent developments of hydrogen production from sewage sludge by biological and thermochemical process, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 44, 19676, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.06.044 · DOI
  3. Chang, 2020, Valorization of sewage sludge in the fabrication of construction and building materials: a review, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 154, 104606, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104606 · DOI
  4. Ma, 2019, Sewage sludge incineration ash for coimmobilization of lead, zinc and copper: mechanisms of metal incorporation and competition, Waste Manag., 99, 102, 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.08.029 · DOI
  5. Zhen, 2017, Overview of pretreatment strategies for enhancing sewage sludge disintegration and subsequent anaerobic digestion: current advances, full-scale application and future perspectives, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 69, 559, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.187 · DOI
  6. Liu, 2018, Effect of hydrothermal carbonization on migration and environmental risk of heavy metals in sewage sludge during pyrolysis, Bioresour. Technol., 247, 282, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.090 · DOI
  7. Zhou, 2018, Development and application of a continuous fast microwave pyrolysis system for sewage sludge utilization, Bioresour. Technol., 256, 295, 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.02.034 · DOI
  8. Weijin, 2019, Hydrogen production and phosphorus recovery via supercritical water gasification of sewage sludge in a batch reactor, Waste Manag., 96, 198, 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.07.023 · DOI
  9. Hantoko, 2019, Supercritical water gasification of sewage sludge and combined cycle for H2 and power production – a thermodynamic study, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 44, 24459, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.210 · DOI
  10. Xiong, 2013, Effect of moisture content on the characterization of products from the pyrolysis of sewage sludge, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol., 104, 632, 10.1016/j.jaap.2013.05.003 · DOI
  11. Ibrahim, 2019, Supercritical water gasification of wastewater sludge for hydrogen production, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 44, 10328, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.184 · DOI
  12. Cherad, 2014, A parametric study on supercritical water gasification of Laminaria hyperborea: a carbohydrate-rich macroalga, Bioresour. Technol., 169, 573, 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.07.046 · DOI
  13. Momirlan, 2005, The properties of hydrogen as fuel tomorrow in sustainable energy system for a cleaner planet, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 30, 795, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.10.011 · DOI
  14. Sheikhdavoodi, 2015, Gasification of sugarcane bagasse in supercritical water; evaluation of alkali catalysts for maximum hydrogen production, J. Energy Inst., 88, 450, 10.1016/j.joei.2014.10.005 · DOI
  15. Chen, 2015, Pyrolysis and oxy-fuel combustion characteristics and kinetics of petrochemical wastewater sludge using thermogravimetric analysis, Bioresour. Technol., 198, 115, 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.09.011 · DOI
  16. He, 2013, Conversion of sewage sludge to clean solid fuel using hydrothermal carbonization: hydrochar fuel characteristics and combustion behavior, Appl. Energy, 111, 257, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.084 · DOI
  17. Ros, 2007, A new generation of sludge-based adsorbents for H2S abatement at room temperature, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 4375, 10.1021/es062358m · DOI
  18. Ros, 2006, Dried sludges and sludge-based chars for H2S removal at low temperature: influence of sewage sludge characteristics, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 302, 10.1021/es050996j · DOI
  19. Saikia, 2015, Ambient air quality and emission characteristics in and around a non-recovery type coke oven using high sulphur coal, Sci. Total Environ., 530, 304, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.109 · DOI
  20. Baruah, 2006, Aqueous leaching on high sulfur sub-bituminous coals, in Assam, India, Energy Fuels, 20, 1550, 10.1021/ef049701y · DOI
  21. Wang, 2020, Effect of temperature on the sulfur fate during hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge, Environ. Pollut., 260, 114067, 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114067 · DOI
  22. Meng, 2016, Sulfur transformation in coal during supercritical water gasification, Fuel, 186, 394, 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.08.097 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Lin, 2021, Effects of process parameters on sulfur migration and H2S generation during supercritical water gasification of sludge, J. Hazard Mater., 403, 123678, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123678 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Cheng, 2017, Effect of alkali addition on sulfur transformation during low temperature pyrolysis of sewage sludge, Proc. Combust. Inst., 36, 2253, 10.1016/j.proci.2016.06.124 · DOI
  25. Lin, 2017, Effects of temperature and potassium compounds on the transformation behavior of sulfur during pyrolysis of oily sludge, Energy Fuels, 31, 7004, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00983 · DOI
  26. Liu, 2015, Release of organic sulfur as sulfur-containing gases during low temperature pyrolysis of sewage sludge, Proc. Combust. Inst., 35, 2767, 10.1016/j.proci.2014.06.055 · DOI
  27. Chen, 2015, Lignite sulfur transformation during the supercritical water gasification process, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol., 116, 161, 10.1016/j.jaap.2015.09.014 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Briggs, 1981, Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy CD wanger, WM Riggs, LE Davis, JF Moulder and GE Muilenberg Perkin-Elmer corp., physical electronics division, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, USA, 1979. 190 pp. $195, Surf. Interface Anal., 3, 10.1002/sia.740030412 · DOI
  29. Wang, 2014, Effect of some natural minerals on transformation behavior of sulfur during pyrolysis of coal and biomass, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol., 105, 284, 10.1016/j.jaap.2013.11.015 · DOI
  30. Zhang, 2013, Effect of the interactions between volatiles and char on sulfur transformation during brown coal upgrade by pyrolysis, Fuel, 103, 915, 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.09.061 · DOI
  31. Yan, 2020, Valorization of sewage sludge through catalytic sub- and supercritical water gasification, J. Energy Inst., 93, 1419, 10.1016/j.joei.2020.01.004 · DOI
  32. Yan, 2020, Valorization of sewage sludge through catalytic sub- and supercritical water gasification, J. Energy Inst., 93, 1419, 10.1016/j.joei.2020.01.004 · DOI
  33. Liu, 2005, Desulfurization of coal by pyrolysis and hydropyrolysis with addition of KOH/NaOH, Energy Fuels, 19, 1673, 10.1021/ef0497053 · DOI
  34. Wang, 2003, Sulfur transformations during supercritical water oxidation of a Chinese coal, Fuel, 82, 2267, 10.1016/S0016-2361(03)00167-4 · DOI
  35. Lin, 2017, Effects of temperature and potassium compounds on the transformation behavior of sulfur during pyrolysis of oily sludge, Energy Fuels, 31, 7004, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00983 · DOI
  36. Zhang, 2011, Sulphur transformation during pyrolysis of an Australian lignite, Proc. Combust. Inst., 33, 1747, 10.1016/j.proci.2010.07.074 · DOI
  37. Wu, 2015, Sulfur transformation during hydrothermal dewatering of low rank coal, Energy Fuels, 29, 6586, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b01258 · DOI
  38. Fontboté, 2017, Sulfide minerals in hydrothermal deposits, Elements, 13, 97, 10.2113/gselements.13.2.97 · DOI
  39. Zhuang, 2018, Denitrification and desulphurization of industrial biowastes via hydrothermal modification, Bioresour. Technol., 254, 121, 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.061 · DOI
  40. He, 2014, Hydrothermal gasification of sewage sludge and model compounds for renewable hydrogen production: a review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 39, 1127, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.141 · DOI
  41. Ratanakandilok, 2001, Coal desulfurization with methanol/water and methanol/KOH, Fuel, 80, 1937, 10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00047-3 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yan, M., Feng, H., Zheng, R., Yu, C., Hantoko, D., Zhou, Z., Zhang, Y., & Kanchanatip, E.
Affiliations
Zhejiang University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Kanchanatip, Ekkachai
ORCID
Venue
Journal of the Energy Institute
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
95
Pages
61-68
ISSN
  • 0144-2600 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9671
DOI
10.1016/j.joei.2021.01.002
OpenAlex
W3120392056
Cited by
50
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Journal of the Energy Institute (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Keywords
supercritical water gasification, sewage sludge, sulfur transformation, hydrogen sulfide, sulfur dioxide, organosulfur compounds, inorganic sulfur, potassium hydroxide, sulfate, silicon disulfide, gasification temperature, sulfur distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review