Cited by 50Subcritical and Supercritical Water ProcessesThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Process Parameters on Sulfur Migration and H2S Generation during Supercritical Water Gasification of Sludge

Abstract

The generation of sulfur-containing pollution products affects the quality of biofuels obtained from the supercritical water gasification (SCWG) of sludge. This study investigates the effects of the gasification temperature, moisture content, and reaction atmosphere on the evolution of sulfur-containing compounds. The results showed that temperature was the key parameter causing the migration of sulfur from sludge to biogas and liquid products. The sludge decomposition reaction was dominated by ionic reactions at 360 °C, while the decomposition of organic matter was converted to free radical reactions as the temperature increased from 380 °C to 440 °C. The mercaptan and thioether contents of the bio-oil decreased to 0.3% at 440 °C. Correspondingly, the concentration of H 2 S increased from 6.7 ppm to 38.0 ppm. The decomposition of organic sulfur with an unstable structure (S-H bond and S-C bond) was the main cause of the increase in the content of H 2 S. Additionally, the solubility and oxidation properties of supercritical water were extremely strong. Some sulfur-containing organic compounds were converted into SO 4 2- via hydrolysis and oxidation reactions, forming sulfate crystals with heavy metals in the bio-char, which aided in achieving the synergistic immobilization of sulfur and heavy metals.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123678

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lin et al. studied the sulfur migration of sludge in SCWG as temperature increased from 380 °C to 440 °C.

    “Lin et al. [34] studied the sulfur migration of sludge in SCWG as temperature increased from 380 ◦C to 440 ◦C.”
  • Current researches on sulfur transformation of different materials in SCWG were studied at relatively lower temperature range.

    “Third, the current researches on sulfur transformation of different materials in SCWG were studied at relatively lower temperature range.”
  • There were differences existing in the sulfurous gases production during SCWG process.

    “Finally, there were differences existing in the sulfurous gases production during SCWG process.”
  • The sulfur transformation pathway and mechanism of crude oil, coal, and sludge in SCWG have been studied by analyzing the sulfur forms in solid, liquid and gaseous products.

    “The sulfur transformation pathway and mechanism of crude oil [32], coal [30,33], and sludge [34,35] in SCWG have been studied by analyzing the sulfur forms in solid, liquid and gaseous products.”
  • Some researchers concluded that there were COS, CH3SH and CH3SCH3 in gaseous products during the SCWG of coal and sludge.

    “Different from them, some researchers concluded that there were COS, CH3SH and CH3SCH3 in gaseous products during the SCWG of coal [33] and sludge [34].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Adar, 2020, Supercritical water gasification of sewage sludge by continuous flow tubular reactor: A pilot scale study, Chem. Eng. J., 391, 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123499 · DOI
  2. Adar, 2019, Characteristics of liquid products in supercritical water gasification of municipal sewage sludge by continuous flow tubular reactor, Waste. Biomass. Valori.
  3. Amrullah, 2018, Supercritical water gasification of sewage sludge in continuous reactor, Bioresour. Technol., 249, 276, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.10.002 · DOI
  4. Azadi, 2013, Catalytic reforming of activated sludge model compounds in supercritical water using nickel and ruthenium catalysts, Appl. Catal. B- Environ., 134
  5. Borges, 2019, Catalytic supercritical water gasification of eucalyptus wood chips in a batch reactor, Fuel, 255, 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.115804 · DOI
  6. Chen, 2015, Lignite sulfur transformation during the supercritical water gasification process, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol., 116, 161, 10.1016/j.jaap.2015.09.014 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Chen, 2019, Theoretical study of the formation mechanism of sulfur-containing gases in the CO2 gasification of lignite, Fuel., 242, 398, 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.01.010 · DOI
  8. Choi, 2019, Valorization of alum sludge via a pyrolysis platform using CO2 as reactive gas medium, Environ. Int., 132, 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105037 · DOI
  9. Fedyaeva, 2019, Conjugated processes of black liquor mineral and organic components conversion in supercritical water, J. Supercrit. Fluids, 143, 191, 10.1016/j.supflu.2018.08.015 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Fedyaeva, 2019, Transformation of lignin under uniform heating. I. Gasification in a flow of water vapor and supercritical water, J. Supercrit. Fluids, 148, 84, 10.1016/j.supflu.2019.03.001 · DOI
  11. Ferreira-Pinto, 2019, Experimental basic factors in the production of H2 via supercritical water gasification, Int. J. Hydrogen Energ., 44, 25365, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.023 · DOI
  12. Hantoko, 2019, Assessment of sewage sludge gasification in supercritical water for H2-rich syngas production, Process. Saf. Environ., 131, 63, 10.1016/j.psep.2019.08.035 · DOI
  13. Frigge, 2017, Release of sulfur and chlorine gas species during coal combustion and pyrolysis in an entrained flow reactor, Fuel, 201, 105, 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.11.037 · DOI
  14. Hantoko, 2019, Supercritical water gasification of sewage sludge and combined cycle for H2 and power production – A thermodynamic study, Int. J. Hydrogen Energ., 44, 24459, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.210 · DOI
  15. He, 2014, Hydrothermal gasification of sewage sludge and model compounds for renewable hydrogen production: A review, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 39, 1127, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.141 · DOI
  16. Ibrahim, 2019, Supercritical water gasification of wastewater sludge for hydrogen production, Int. J. Hydrogen. Energ., 44, 10328, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.184 · DOI
  17. Igalavithana, 2020, Gasification biochar from biowaste (food waste and wood waste) for effective CO2 adsorption, J. Hazard. Mater., 391, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121147 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Kang, 2016, Hydrogen production from lignin, cellulose and waste biomass via supercritical water gasification: Catalyst activity and process optimization study, Energ. Convers. Manage., 117, 528, 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.03.008 · DOI
  19. Krishnamoorthy, 2016, Fate of Sulfur during Entrained-Flow Gasification of Pittsburgh No. 8 Coal: Influence of Particle Size, Sulfur Forms, and Temperature, Energ. Fuel., 30, 3241, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02691 · DOI
  20. Li, 2019, Decomposition behavior and mechanism of epoxy resin from waste integrated circuits under supercritical water condition, J. Hazard. Mater., 374, 356, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.04.028 · DOI
  21. Li, 2009, Investigation of sulfur forms and transformation during the co-combustion of sewage sludge and coal using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, J. Hazard. Mater., 167, 1126, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.115 · DOI
  22. Lin, 2019, Hydrogen-rich bio-gas generation and optimization in relation to heavy metals immobilization during Pd-catalyzed supercritical water gasification of sludge, Energy., 189, 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116296 · DOI
  23. Liu, 2012, Emission characteristics of nitrogen- and sulfur-containing odorous compounds during different sewage sludge chemical conditioning processes, J. Hazard. Mater., 235-236, 298, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.07.060 · DOI
  24. Ma, 2017, Supercritical water pyrolysis of sewage sludge, Waste. Manage., 59, 371, 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.053 · DOI
  25. Meng, 2016, Sulfur transformation in coal during supercritical water gasification, Fuel., 186, 394, 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.08.097 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Nanda, 2019, Catalytic subcritical and supercritical water gasification as a resource recovery approach from waste tires for hydrogen-rich syngas production, J. Supercrit. Fluid., 154, 10.1016/j.supflu.2019.104627 · DOI
  27. Nanda, 2017, An assessment of pinecone gasification in subcritical, near-critical and supercritical water, Fuel. Process. Technol., 168, 84, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.08.017 · DOI
  28. Okolie, 2020, A review on subcritical and supercritical water gasification of biogenic, polymeric and petroleum wastes to hydrogen-rich synthesis gas, Renew. Sust. Energy. Rev., 119, 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109546 · DOI
  29. Patwardhan, 2013, Supercritical Water Desulfurization of Organic Sulfides Is Consistent with Free-Radical Kinetics, Energ. Fuel., 27, 6108, 10.1021/ef401150w · DOI
  30. Promdej, 2011, Temperature Effect on Hydrothermal Decomposition of Glucose in Sub- And Supercritical Water, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 50, 8492, 10.1021/ie200298c · DOI
  31. Rana, 2020, Catalytic gasification of light and heavy gas oils in supercritical water, J. Energy. Inst., 10.1016/j.joei.2020.04.018 · DOI
  32. Rodriguez Correa, 2018, Supercritical water gasification of biomass for hydrogen production – Review, J. Supercrit. Fluids, 133, 573, 10.1016/j.supflu.2017.09.019 · DOI
  33. Radfarnia, 2015, Supercritical water treatment of oil sludge, a viable route to valorize waste oil materials, Fuel, 159, 653, 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.06.094 · DOI
  34. Sun, 2018, Study on the effects of catalysts on the immobilization efficiency and mechanism of heavy metals during the microwave pyrolysis of sludge, Waste. Manage., 77, 131, 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.046 · DOI
  35. Wang, 2018, Sulphur poisoning of solid oxide electrolysis cell anodes, Electrochim. Acta., 269, 188, 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.02.149 · DOI
  36. Xia, 2019, Sulfur induced corrosion (SIC) mechanism of steam generator (SG) tubing at micro scale: A critical review, Mater. Chem. Phys., 233, 133, 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.05.056 · DOI
  37. Zhang, 2020, Enhanced dehalogenation and coupled recovery of complex electronic display housing plastics by sub/supercritical CO2, J. Hazard. Mater., 382, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121140 · DOI
  38. Zaker, 2019, Microwave-assisted pyrolysis of sewage sludge: A review, Fuel Process. Technol., 187, 84, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.12.011 · DOI
  39. Zhang, 2011, Sulphur transformation during pyrolysis of an Australian lignite, P. Combust. Inst., 33, 1747, 10.1016/j.proci.2010.07.074 · DOI
  40. Zhang, 2017, Sulfur Transformation during Microwave and Conventional Pyrolysis of Sewage Sludge, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 709, 10.1021/acs.est.6b03784 · DOI
  41. Zhang, 2017, Release of hydrogen sulfide during microwave pyrolysis of sewage sludge: Effect of operating parameters and mechanism, J. Hazard. Mater., 331, 117, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.02.040 · DOI
  42. Zhang, 2014, Pyrite transformation and sulfur dioxide release during calcination of coal gangue, RSC Adv., 4, 42506, 10.1039/C4RA06954D · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lin, J., Liao, Q., Hu, Y., Ma, R., Cui, C., Sun, S., & Liu, X.
Affiliations
  • Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Cui, Chongwei
  • Sun, Shichang
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
403
Pages
123678
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3049756032
Cited by
50
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Science and Technology Planning Project of Shenzhen Municipality
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Keywords
supercritical water gasification, sewage sludge, sulfur migration, hydrogen sulfide production, bio-oil, gasification temperature, moisture content, reaction atmosphere, thiols, thioethers, sulfate formation, heavy metal immobilization, biochar, sulfur compounds
MeSH terms
Organic Chemicals, Sewage, Sulfur, Temperature, Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review