The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How time preferences differ: Evidence from 53 countries
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations
Bhagat, R. S., & Hofstede, G. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/4134391 · Cited by 21,664
Endogenous Technological Change
Romer, P. M. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261725 · Cited by 17,711
Endogenous Technological Change
Romer, P. (1989) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w3210 · Cited by 13,303
Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review
Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G. F., & O’Donoghue, T. (2002) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/002205102320161311 · Cited by 6,381
Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting
Laibson, D. (1997) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355397555253 · Cited by 6,122
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
Frederick, S. (2005) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533005775196732 · Cited by 5,256
The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth
Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988) · Organizational Dynamics · doi:10.1016/0090-2616(88)90009-5 · Cited by 4,380
Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency
Thaler, R. (1981) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/0165-1765(81)90067-7 · Cited by 2,243
Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics
Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2005) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/0022051053737843 · Cited by 2,161
An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement.
Commons, M. L., Mazur, J., Nevin, J. A., & Rachlin, H. C. (1987) · doi:10.4324/9781315825502-11 · Cited by 1,861
Cited by
Global Evidence on Economic Preferences*
Falk, A., Becker, A., Dohmen, T., Enke, B., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2018) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjy013 · Cited by 1,724
On the Measurement of Procrastination: Comparing Two Scales in Six European Countries
Svartdal, F., Pfuhl, G., Nordby, K., Foschi, G., Klingsieck, K. B., Rozental, A., Carlbring, P., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Rębkowska, K. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01307 · Cited by 99
Liu, M., Hu, X., & Schedl, M. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208186 · Cited by 43
The spread of technological innovations: effects of psychology, culture and policy interventions
Tverskoi, D., Babu, S., & Gavrilets, S. (2022) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.211833 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, M., Rieger, M. O., & Hens, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-02
- Volume
- 52
- Pages
- 115-135
- ISSN
- 0167-4870 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3125720114
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 80
- FWCI
- 16.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How time preferences differ: Evidence from 53 countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.joep.2015.12.001
- The paper
- Wang, M., Rieger, M. O., & Hens, T. (2016). How time preferences differ: Evidence from 53 countries. Journal of Economic Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.12.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
