Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 277

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 155 of the 155 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does relationship learning lead to relationship value? A cross‐national supply chain investigation

Cheung, Mee‐Shew, Myers, Matthew B., Mentzer, John T.·2010·Journal of Operations Management

Abstract

In global business‐to‐business markets, shared resources between buyers and suppliers often result in competitive advantages and enhanced relationships between firms. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of research regarding learning capabilities between business partners in a cross‐border setting. This study takes the approach to integrate customer value literature into interorganizational learning theory and adopts the often‐neglected theoretical perspective of transaction value by contextualizing inter‐firm collaboration in terms of relationship learning and value co‐creation viewed by both the buyers and sellers in one single study. Through the development of a conceptual framework that examines how global environmental and inter‐organizational conditions influence learning capabilities, the study investigates how relationship learning influences relationship value for both supplying and buying firms. Using a survey of 126 cross‐border dyads in the industrial chemical, packaging, consumer durable, and apparel industries, the authors show how relationship learning is valued by both buyers and suppliers, and how it is critical when viewing the “supplier as a customer.” The results indicate the strategic nature of relationship learning in maintaining cross‐border business‐to‐business relationships. Simultaneously, the findings provide evidence that cultural distance is not a significant influence on the firm's propensity to share knowledge with its global partners. It helps advance our understanding of the significance of cultural‐pollination in the era of globalization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jom.2010.01.003

Cites

155 of 155 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 155 references

Cited by

See all 277

Metadata

Authors
Cheung, M., Myers, M. B., & Mentzer, J. T.
Venue
Journal of Operations Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-02
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
472-487
ISSN
  • 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-1317
OpenAlex
W1995910526
Cited by
277
References
155
FWCI
24.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does relationship learning lead to relationship value? A cross‐national supply chain investigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jom.2010.01.003
The paper
Cheung, M., Myers, M. B., & Mentzer, J. T. (2010). Does relationship learning lead to relationship value? A cross‐national supply chain investigation. Journal of Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.01.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.