Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 937

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 315 of the 315 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Revisiting the interplay between contractual and relational governance: A qualitative and meta‐analytic investigation

Open access
Cao, Zhi, Lumineau, Fabrice·2015·Journal of Operations Management

Abstract

Although extant literature has shown that formal contracts and relational governance play a key role in interorganizational relationships, the nature of their interplay still remains equivocal. To better understand the relationships between contractual and relational governance, we conducted a qualitative review and meta‐analysis of the existing literature. Meta‐analytic results from 33,051 interorganizational relationships across 149 empirical studies have indicated that contractual governance is positively related to both sides of relational governance—trust and relational norms. Our results have also indicated that contracts, trust, and relational norms jointly improve satisfaction and relationship performance and jointly reduce opportunism. These findings provide strong evidence for the complementarity arguments of the contractual–relational governance relationships and their joint impacts on performance. We also found that the mutual relationships between contractual and relational governance are moderated by the institutional environments, the interorganizational relationship type and length, and the construct measurement of contracts. Overall, this study provides new insights on when contractual and relational governance complement or substitute each other. We discuss the implications of our study for theory and practice and propose a research agenda for future research on governance in interorganizational relationships.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jom.2014.09.009

Cites

315 of 315 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 315 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. 10.2307/3151999 · DOI
  2. *Chen C., 2013, Governance mechanisms and new venture performance in China, Syst. Res. Behav. Sci., 30, 383, 10.1002/sres.2178 · doi:10.1002/sres.2178
  3. Deakin S., 1998, Trust Within and Between Organizations: Conceptual Issues and Applications, 146, 10.1093/oso/9780198293187.003.0006 · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198293187.003.0006
  4. 10.2307/1252016 · DOI
  5. 10.1509/mkg.67.4.18.18689 · doi:10.1509/mkg.67.4.18.18689 · Paper page
  6. 10.2307/1252040 · DOI
  7. 10.1037/0021-9010.80.2.327 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.80.2.327 · Paper page
  8. 10.1504/IJPM.2009.023403 · doi:10.1504/ijpm.2009.023403
  9. Malhotra D., 2009, When contracts destroy trust, Harv. Bus. Rev., 87, 25
  10. 10.1111/1540-5893.3701003 · doi:10.1111/1540-5893.3701003
  11. Talay M.B., 2014, In time we trust? The effects of duration on the dynamics of trust‐building processes in inter‐organizational relationships, Strat. Manage. Rev., 8, 77
  12. *Yang C., 2012, What makes outsourcing effective?. A transaction‐cost economics analysis, Int. J. Prod. Res., 50, 4462, 10.1080/00207543.2011.600345 · doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.600345
  13. 10.4135/9781452231075.n10 · doi:10.4135/9781452231075.n10
  14. 10.1108/17506141211259159 · doi:10.1108/17506141211259159
  15. 10.1016/j.omega.2003.09.016 · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2003.09.016
  16. N.*KumarCapability governance and collaboration: understanding the supplier perspective (Unpublished doctoral dissertation)2012University of BathUK
  17. 10.1007/s12063-008-0004-0 · doi:10.1007/s12063-008-0004-0
  18. 10.1300/J033v13n02_04 · doi:10.1300/j033v13n02_04

Cited by

See all 937

Metadata

Authors
Cao, Z., & Lumineau, F.
Venue
Journal of Operations Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-10-02
Volume
33-34
Issue
1
Pages
15-42
ISSN
  • 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-1317
OpenAlex
W2064833339
Cited by
937
References
315
FWCI
78.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revisiting the interplay between contractual and relational governance: A qualitative and meta‐analytic investigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jom.2014.09.009
The paper
Cao, Z., & Lumineau, F. (2015). Revisiting the interplay between contractual and relational governance: A qualitative and meta‐analytic investigation. Journal of Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.09.009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.