The DOI matches its Crossref record; 315 of the 315 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revisiting the interplay between contractual and relational governance: A qualitative and meta‐analytic investigation
Open accessAbstract
Although extant literature has shown that formal contracts and relational governance play a key role in interorganizational relationships, the nature of their interplay still remains equivocal. To better understand the relationships between contractual and relational governance, we conducted a qualitative review and meta‐analysis of the existing literature. Meta‐analytic results from 33,051 interorganizational relationships across 149 empirical studies have indicated that contractual governance is positively related to both sides of relational governance—trust and relational norms. Our results have also indicated that contracts, trust, and relational norms jointly improve satisfaction and relationship performance and jointly reduce opportunism. These findings provide strong evidence for the complementarity arguments of the contractual–relational governance relationships and their joint impacts on performance. We also found that the mutual relationships between contractual and relational governance are moderated by the institutional environments, the interorganizational relationship type and length, and the construct measurement of contracts. Overall, this study provides new insights on when contractual and relational governance complement or substitute each other. We discuss the implications of our study for theory and practice and propose a research agenda for future research on governance in interorganizational relationships.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
North, D. C. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808678 · Cited by 32,691
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
Munger, M. C., & North, D. C. (1991) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1060065 · Cited by 24,871
Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations
Bhagat, R. S., & Hofstede, G. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/4134391 · Cited by 21,664
Exchange and Power in Social Life
Blau, P. M. (2017) · doi:10.4324/9780203792643 · Cited by 15,923
The Economic Institutions of Capitalism
Dugger, W. M. (1987) · Journal of Economic Issues · doi:10.1080/00213624.1987.11504638 · Cited by 14,786
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
Exchange and Power in Social Life.
Bierstedt, R., & Blau, P. M. (1965) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091154 · Cited by 13,624
The Economic Institutions of Capitalism
(1986) · The Antitrust Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0003603x8603100308 · Cited by 10,730
Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations
Williamson, O. E. (1979) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466942 · Cited by 10,190
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- 10.2307/3151999 · DOI
- *Chen C., 2013, Governance mechanisms and new venture performance in China, Syst. Res. Behav. Sci., 30, 383, 10.1002/sres.2178 · doi:10.1002/sres.2178
- Deakin S., 1998, Trust Within and Between Organizations: Conceptual Issues and Applications, 146, 10.1093/oso/9780198293187.003.0006 · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198293187.003.0006
- 10.2307/1252016 · DOI
- 10.1509/mkg.67.4.18.18689 · doi:10.1509/mkg.67.4.18.18689 · Paper page
- 10.2307/1252040 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.80.2.327 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.80.2.327 · Paper page
- 10.1504/IJPM.2009.023403 · doi:10.1504/ijpm.2009.023403
- Malhotra D., 2009, When contracts destroy trust, Harv. Bus. Rev., 87, 25
- 10.1111/1540-5893.3701003 · doi:10.1111/1540-5893.3701003
- Talay M.B., 2014, In time we trust? The effects of duration on the dynamics of trust‐building processes in inter‐organizational relationships, Strat. Manage. Rev., 8, 77
- *Yang C., 2012, What makes outsourcing effective?. A transaction‐cost economics analysis, Int. J. Prod. Res., 50, 4462, 10.1080/00207543.2011.600345 · doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.600345
- 10.4135/9781452231075.n10 · doi:10.4135/9781452231075.n10
- 10.1108/17506141211259159 · doi:10.1108/17506141211259159
- 10.1016/j.omega.2003.09.016 · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2003.09.016
- N.*KumarCapability governance and collaboration: understanding the supplier perspective (Unpublished doctoral dissertation)2012University of BathUK
- 10.1007/s12063-008-0004-0 · doi:10.1007/s12063-008-0004-0
- 10.1300/J033v13n02_04 · doi:10.1300/j033v13n02_04
Cited by
ESG and Industry 5.0: The role of technologies in enhancing ESG disclosure
Asif, M., Searcy, C., & Castka, P. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122806 · Cited by 325
Liu, W., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2018) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.01.006 · Cited by 298
Digital governance: A conceptual framework and research agenda
Hanisch, M., Goldsby, C. M., Fabian, N. E., & Oehmichen, J. (2023) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113777 · Cited by 267
Business model innovation and value-creation: the triadic way
Andreassen, T. W., Lervik-Olsen, L., Snyder, H., Van Riel, A. C. R., Sweeney, J. C., & Van Vaerenbergh, Y. (2018) · Journal of Service Management · doi:10.1108/josm-05-2018-0125 · Cited by 160
How Can It Be Made Right Again? A Review of Trust Repair Research
Sharma, K., Schoorman, F. D., & Ballinger, G. A. (2023) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063221089897 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Cao, Z., & Lumineau, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Operations Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-10-02
- Volume
- 33-34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-42
- ISSN
- 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-1317
- OpenAlex
- W2064833339
- Cited by
- 937
- References
- 315
- FWCI
- 78.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revisiting the interplay between contractual and relational governance: A qualitative and meta‐analytic investigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jom.2014.09.009
- The paper
- Cao, Z., & Lumineau, F. (2015). Revisiting the interplay between contractual and relational governance: A qualitative and meta‐analytic investigation. Journal of Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.09.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.