The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cryogenic Electron Microscopy for Characterizing and Diagnosing Batteries
Open accessAbstract
Summary Most battery materials are beam sensitive, especially after cycling, which can be hardly characterized by electron microscopy (EM) with a high-energy beam. Inspired by structural biology, cryogenic EM (cryo-EM) offers a way to preserve the native state and image the battery materials at the nano/atomic scale. In this perspective, we highlight strategies on how to preserve the pristine intrinsic information of battery materials in terms of sample preparation, transformation, and imaging. Some key technical breakthroughs for the development of the cryo-EM are briefly illustrated to demonstrate its working principles. Recent achievements on cryo-EM characterization of battery materials are reviewed, especially Li metal. These profound observations demonstrate the increasing essential role of cryo-EM on diagnosing and characterizing the chemical, morphological, and atomic structure of battery materials. The new insights and knowledge obtained through this emerging new toolset will benefit the battery research field tremendously.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Atomic structure of sensitive battery materials and interfaces revealed by cryo–electron microscopy
Li, Y., Li, Y., Pei, A., Yan, K., Sun, Y., Wu, C.-L., Joubert, L.-M., Chin, R., Koh, A. L., Yu, Y., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aam6014 · Cited by 1,547 · cited 4×
“The results show that the electrolyte additives, such as Cs, Zn, and fluoroethylene carbonate, mainly influence the component and distribution of the SEI rather than the bulk Li metal.(5,7,31) Artificial films, such as Al2O3, ionomer, and CH3OCO2Li are uniformly coated on the Li metal and protect the EDLi from the ele…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationHabraken, W. J. E. M., Tao, J., Brylka, L. J., Friedrich, H., Bertinetti, L., Schenk, A. S., Verch, A., Dmitrovic, V., Bomans, P. H. H., Frederik, P. M., et al. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2490 · Cited by 821
Wang, X., Zhang, M., Alvarado, J., Wang, S., Sina, M., Lu, B., Bouwer, J., Xu, W., Xiao, J., Zhang, J.-G., et al. (2017) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03606 · Cited by 409
Self-citationZhong, S., & Pochan, D. J. (2010) · Polymer Reviews · doi:10.1080/15583724.2010.493254 · Cited by 51
Cited by
Zheng, J., Kim, M. S., Tu, Z., Choudhury, S., Tang, T., & Archer, L. A. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c9cs00883g · Cited by 466
Interface engineering toward stable lithium–sulfur batteries
Guo, Y., Niu, Q., Pei, F., Wang, Q., Zhang, Y., Du, L., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Fan, L., et al. (2024) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d3ee04183b · Cited by 322
Shadike, Z., Lee, H., Borodin, O., Cao, X., Fan, X., Wang, X., Lin, R., Bak, S.-M., Ghose, S., Xu, K., et al. (2021) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-020-00845-5 · Cited by 320
Self-citationThenuwara, A. C., Shetty, P. P., Kondekar, N., Sandoval, S. E., Cavallaro, K., May, R., Yang, C.-T., Marbella, L. E., Qi, Y., & McDowell, M. T. (2020) · ACS Energy Letters · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.0c01209 · Cited by 264
Huang, J., Guo, X., Du, X., Lin, X., Huang, J.-Q., Tan, H., Zhu, Y., & Zhang, B. (2019) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c8ee03632b · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, X., Li, Y., & Meng, Y. S.
- Venue
- Joule
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2225-2234
- ISSN
- 2542-4351 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2897015245
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cryogenic Electron Microscopy for Characterizing and Diagnosing Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.joule.2018.10.005
- The paper
- Wang, X., Li, Y., & Meng, Y. S. (2018). Cryogenic Electron Microscopy for Characterizing and Diagnosing Batteries. Joule. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.10.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
