Cited by 43CO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesClimate Change and Geoengineering

Using ikaite and other hydrated carbonate minerals to increase ocean alkalinity for carbon dioxide removal and environmental remediation

Open access
Renforth, Phil, Baltruschat, Stefan, Peterson, Kristina, Mihailova, Boriana D., Hartmann, Jens·2022·Joule

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.joule.2022.11.001

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In open ocean applications, faster-dissolving minerals can be used for OAE if they dissolve sufficiently rapidly before sinking below the mixed layer.

    “In open ocean applications, faster-dissolving minerals can be used for OAE if they dissolve sufficiently rapidly before sinking below the mixed layer. 23”

    From A framework for understanding efficiency losses of Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement (2026) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says ikaite crystals smaller than 300 μm will dissolve within the ocean mixed layer and could contribute to CO2 removal. That supports the claim for ikaite, but the passage does not establish the broader claim about faster-dissolving minerals generally or explicitly discuss dissolution before particles sink below the mixed layer. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [6]6. Bischoff, J.L. ∙ Fitzpatrick, J.A. ∙ Rosenbauer, R.J. The solubility and stabilization of ikaite (CaCO3· 6H2O) from 0 to 25 C: Environmental and paleoclimatic implications for thinolite tufa J. Geol. 1993; 101:21-33 Crossref Scopus (169) Google Scholar

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Renforth, P., Baltruschat, S., Peterson, K., Mihailova, B. D., & Hartmann, J.
Affiliations
  • Heriot-Watt University (GB)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Renforth, Phil
  • Hartmann, Jens
Venue
Joule
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
6
Issue
12
Pages
2674-2679
ISSN
2542-4351 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313215256
Cited by
39
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 18 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Joule (publishedVersion)
Funders
ClimateWorks Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
Keywords
ikaite, ocean alkalinity enhancement, carbon dioxide removal, ocean acidification, ocean alkalinity, bicarbonate, environmental remediation, Paris Agreement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review