Peak and End Effects in Patients' Daily Recall of Pain and Fatigue: A Within-Subjects Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Unlabelled Clinical research often relies on retrospective recall of symptom levels, but the information contained in these ratings is not well understood. The "peak-and-end rule" suggests that the most intense (peak) and final (end) moments of an experience disproportionately influence retrospective judgments, which may bias self-reports of somatic symptoms. This study examined the extent to which peak and end symptom levels systematically affect patients' day-to-day recall of pain and fatigue. Rheumatology patients (N = 97) completed 5 to 6 momentary ratings of pain and fatigue per day as well as a daily recall rating of these symptoms for 28 consecutive days. For pain, peak and end momentary ratings predicted daily recall of average pain beyond the actual average of momentary ratings. This effect was small, yet was confirmed in both between-person and within-person (repeated measures) analyses. For fatigue, neither peak nor end momentary symptoms significantly contributed to daily recall. Of note, the evidence for peak- and end-effects in recall of pain and fatigue varied significantly between individual patients. These findings suggest that peak- and end-effects create a small bias in recall reports of pain, but not fatigue. However, there are considerable individual differences in susceptibility to peak and end heuristics. Perspective The peak-end cognitive heuristic could bias end-of-day recall of pain and fatigue. An effect was shown for pain, but not for fatigue. The effects were small and were unlikely to substantially bias end-of-day assessments. Individuals were shown to differ in the degree that the heuristic was associated with recall.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This finding is somewhat consistent with previous findings supporting the cognitive reserve hypothesis, that higher education mitigates cognitive problems associated with MS.
“This finding is somewhat consistent with previous findings supporting the cognitive reserve hypothesis, that higher education mitigates cognitive problems associated with MS73–75.”
From Ecological momentary assessment of pain, fatigue, depressive, and cognitive symptoms reveals significant daily variability in multiple sclerosis (2017) · cites this paper as [75]
The Discussion addresses peak-end effects in daily recall of pain and fatigue among patients with rheumatological conditions, not cognitive problems associated with MS. Searches for cognitive reserve, higher education, and MS found no passage addressing whether education mitigates those problems. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Redelmeier, D. A., & Kahneman, D. (1996) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(96)02994-6 · Cited by 1,078 · see citing works
The use of multiple-item scales for pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients
Jensen, M. P., Turner, L. R., Turner, J. A., & Romano, J. M. (1996) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(96)03078-3 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- [1]Broderick JE Schwartz JE Schneider S Stone AA Can end-of-day reports replace momentary assessment of pain and fatigue? J Pain 2009 10 274 281 19070550 PMC2757263
- [2]Broderick JE Schwartz JE Vikingstad G Pribbernow M Grossman S Stone AA The accuracy of pain and fatigue items across different reporting periods Pain 2008 139 146 157 18455312 PMC2617790
- [3]Daut RL Cleeland CS The prevalence and severity of pain in cancer Cancer 1982 50 1913 1918 7116316
- [4]Epstein S Pacini R Denes-Raj V Heier H Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles J Pers Soc Psychol 1996 71 390 405 8765488
- [5]Evans EJ Wickstrom B Subjective fatigue and self-care in individuals with chronic illness Medsurg Nurs 1999 8 363 369 11000775
- [6]Gendreau M Hufford MR Stone AA Measuring clinical pain in chronic widespread pain: selected methodological issues Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2003 17 575 592 12849713
- [7]Jensen MP Mardekian J Lakshminarayanan M Boye ME Validity of 24-h recall ratings of pain severity: biasing effects of “peak” and “end” pain Pain 2008 137 422 427 18035495
- [10]Kreft IGG de Leeuw J Aiken LS The effect of different forms of centering in hierarchical linear models Multivariate Behavioral Research 1995 30 1 21 26828342
- [11]Lambert PC Burton PR Abrams KR Brooke AM The analysis of peak expiratory flow data using a three-level hierarchical model Stat Med 2004 23 3821 3839 15580603
- [12]Mendoza TR Wang XS Cleeland CS Morrissey M Johnson BA Wendt JK Huber SL The rapid assessment of fatigue severity in cancer patients: use of the Brief Fatigue Inventory Cancer 1999 85 1186 1196 10091805
- [13]Miron-Shatz T Evaluating multiepisode events: Boundary conditions for the peak-end rule Emotion 2009 9 206 213 19348533
- [15]Redelmeier DA Katz J Kahneman D Memories of colonoscopy: A randomized trial Pain 2003 104 187 194 12855328
- [16]Schafer JL Graham JW Missing data: Our view of the state of the art Psychol Methods 2002 7 147 177 12090408
- [17]Schwartz JE Stone AA Stone AA Shiffman S Atienza AA Nebeling L The analysis of real-time momentary data: a practical guide The science of real-time data capture: self-reports in health research 2007 76 116 Oxford University Press New York
- [18]Smith SM Levin IP Need for cognition and choice framing effects Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1996 9 283 290
- [19]Stone AA Broderick JE Kaell AT DelesPaul PA Porter LE Does the peak-end phenomenon observed in laboratory pain studies apply to real-world pain in rheumatoid arthritis? J Pain 2000 1 212 217 14622620
- [20]Stone AA Broderick JE Porter LS Kaell AT The experience of rheumatoid arthritis pain and fatigue: Examining momentary reports and correlates over one week Arthritis Care Res 1997 10 185 193 9335630
- [21]Stone AA Schwartz JE Broderick JE Shiffman SS Variability of momentary pain predicts recall of weekly pain: a consequence of the peak (or salience) memory heuristic Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2005 31 1340 1346 16143666
- [23]Thiébaut R Jacqmin-Gadda H Chêne G Leport C Commenges D Bivariate linear mixed models using SAS proc MIXED Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2002 69 249 256 12204452
- [24]U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Accessed March 22 Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims 2010 Available at http://www.fda.gov PMC1629006 17034633
- [25]Wolfe F Hawley DJ Wilson K The prevalence and meaning of fatigue in rheumatic disease J Rheumatol 1996 23 1407 1417 8856621
- [26]Zautra AJ Fasman R Parish BP Davis MC Daily fatigue in women with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgia Pain 2007 128 128 135 17055648
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ecological momentary assessment methodology in chronic pain research: a systematic review
May, M., Junghaenel, D. U., Ono, M., Stone, A. A., & Schneider, S. (2018) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2018.01.006 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Self-citationStone, A. A., Broderick, J. E., Junghaenel, D. U., Schneider, S., & Schwartz, J. E. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.029 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Self-citationKim, J., Loggia, M. L., Cahalan, C. M., Harris, R. E., Beissner, F., Garcia, R. G., Kim, H., Barbieri, R., Wasan, A. D., Edwards, R. R., et al. (2015) · Arthritis & Rheumatology · doi:10.1002/art.39043 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Fischer, S., Doerr, J. M., Strahler, J., Mewes, R., Thieme, K., & Nater, U. M. (2016) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.09.018 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Kratz, A. L., Murphy, S. L., & Braley, T. J. (2017) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2017.07.002 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schneider, S., Stone, A. A., Schwartz, J. E., & Broderick, J. E.
- Affiliations
- Stony Brook University (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Pain
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 228-235
- ISSN
- 1526-5900 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3012151
- OpenAlex
- W1965433274
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (U01AR052170, R01AR054626, 1 U01-AR052170-01)
- National Center for Research Resources (#M01RR10710, M01RR010710)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- fatigue, within-person variability, individual differences, rheumatology patients
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Pain, Intractable, Intractable Pain, Retrospective Studies, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review