Cited by 227Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Opioid UsePain Mechanisms and Treatments

The use of multiple-item scales for pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients

Jensen, Mark P, Turner, Lindsey R, Turner, Judith A, Romano, Joan M·1996·Pain

Abstract

This study examined the relative predictive validities of several measures of pain intensity. Forty chronic pain patients completed 6-14 days worth of hourly pain ratings, which were averaged to obtain a measure of actual average pain intensity. These patients then made ratings, on 101-point numerical rating scales, of worst, least, and usual pain during the previous 2 wks, and of their current pain. A series of correlation coefficients were computed and regression analyses were performed to determine the individual or composite measures that best predicted actual average pain intensity. Consistent with previous research, the best single predictor of actual average pain intensity was patient rating of least pain in the previous 2 wks. Of all possible composites of usual, least, worst, and current pain ratings, the arithmetic mean of least and usual pain had the strongest relationship to actual average pain. The inclusion of ratings of most pain or current pain in any composite score actually weakened the relationship between the composite score and actual average pain intensity. These results suggest that, when clinicians or researchers wish to assess average pain among chronic pain patients, but cannot obtain multiple measures of pain over time, the most valid measure would be the arithmetic mean of patient-recalled least and usual pain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-3959(96)03078-3

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jensen, M. P., Turner, L. R., Turner, J. A., & Romano, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Jensen, Mark P
Venue
Pain
Published
1996-09
Volume
67
Issue
1
Pages
35-40
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071290055
Cited by
227
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
chronic pain, pain intensity assessment, numerical rating scale, predictive validity, patient recall, composite score
MeSH terms
Adult, Chronic Disease, Humans, Memory, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychometrics, Regression Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review