CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 292Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Opioid UsePain Mechanisms and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence of Persistent Pain in the U.S. Adult Population: New Data From the 2010 National Health Interview Survey

Open access
Kennedy, Jae, Roll, John M., Schraudner, Taylor, Murphy, Sean, McPherson, Sterling·2014·The Journal of Pain
DOI 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.05.009
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Unlabelled Published adult prevalence estimates of chronic pain in the United States vary significantly. A more consistent pain measure is needed to assess unmet need for pain management in the general population. In this study, secondary analyses of the 2010 Quality of Life Supplement of the National Health Interview Survey are used to calculate the point prevalence of "persistent pain," which we defined as constant or frequent pain persisting for at least 3 months. Rates of persistent pain are also calculated by risk group, chronic condition, and disability status. Findings show that about 19.0% of adults in the United States report persistent pain. Rates of persistent pain are higher among women, adults aged 60 to 69, adults who rate their health as fair or poor, adults who are overweight or obese, and those who were hospitalized 1 or more times in the preceding year. Most adults who report conditions such as arthritis, carpal tunnel syndrome, or back or joint pain do not describe their pain as "persistent." Of the estimated 39.4 million adults who report persistent pain, 67.2% say their pain is "constantly present," and 50.5% say their pain is sometimes "unbearable and excruciating."Perspective Persistent pain, defined as self-reported pain "every day" or "most days" in the preceding 3 months, is a useful way to characterize health-related quality of life in the general population, and policy makers should consider including this core measure in ongoing health surveys like the National Health Interview Survey and the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, the authors conclude.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.05.009

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Harstall, 2003, How prevalent is chronic pain, Pain Clin Updates, 11, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kennedy, J., Roll, J. M., Schraudner, T., Murphy, S., & McPherson, S.
Affiliations
Washington State University Spokane (US)
Corresponding author
Kennedy, Jae
ORCID
Venue
The Journal of Pain
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
15
Issue
10
Pages
979-984
ISSN
1526-5900 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jpain.2014.05.009
OpenAlex
W2029948449
Cited by
292
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 12
FWCI
15.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
RTI International
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
chronic pain, prevalence, health-related quality of life, pain intensity, disability status, obesity, arthritis, back pain, carpal tunnel syndrome, sex differences, older adults, hospitalized adults, pain assessment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, United States, Prevalence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review