Cited by 117Pain Management and Placebo EffectPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsAcupuncture Treatment Research Studies

Conditioned Placebo Analgesia Persists When Subjects Know They Are Receiving a Placebo

Open access
Schafer, Scott M., Colloca, Luana, Wager, Tor D.·2015·The Journal of Pain

Abstract

Unlabelled Belief in the effectiveness of a placebo treatment is widely thought to be critical for placebo analgesia. Many types of placebo responses--even those that depend on conditioning--appear to be mediated by expectations that are strengthened as treatment cues are reinforced with positive outcomes. However, placebo effects may occur even when participants are aware they are receiving a placebo. To address the question of whether conditioned placebo analgesia can persist in the absence of expectations, we studied the effects of long (4 days) versus short (1 day) conditioning to a placebo treatment. After an initial placebo test, a "reveal" manipulation convincingly demonstrated to participants that they had never received an active drug. Placebo analgesia persisted after the reveal in the long conditioning group only. These findings suggest that reinforcing treatment cues with positive outcomes can create placebo effects that are independent of reported expectations for pain relief.Perspective This article demonstrates a form of placebo analgesia that relies on prior conditioning rather than current expected pain relief. This highlights the importance of prior experience on pain relief and offers insight into the variability of placebo effects across individuals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.12.008

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In some cases cue effects can persist even after reinforcement ceases, resisting extinction and sometimes even growing over time.

    “However, in some cases cue effects can persist even after reinforcement ceases, resisting extinction and sometimes even growing over time (34–37).”

    From Social information creates self-fulfilling prophecies in judgments of pain, vicarious pain, and cognitive effort (2026) · cites this paper as [35]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that placebo analgesia persisted after multiple conditioning sessions even when participants learned the treatment was a placebo; the Introduction also describes greater resistance to extinction with more conditioning. The paper does not show cue effects growing after reinforcement ceases: Results > Placebo Analgesia reports that analgesia decreased marginally after the reveal. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schafer, S. M., Colloca, L., & Wager, T. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Schafer, Scott M.
Venue
The Journal of Pain
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
412-420
ISSN
1526-5900 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085650940
Cited by
117
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8
FWCI
8.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1f31da034516-01)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH076136)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (5F31DA034516-03, F31 DA034516)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (Z99AT999999)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
Keywords
placebo effect, expectations, conditioning, analgesia, prior experience, interindividual variability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analgesia, Conditioning, Psychological, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Placebo Effect, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review