Cited by 305Pain Management and Placebo EffectPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsDental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques

Nonconscious activation of placebo and nocebo pain responses

Open access
Jensen, Karin B., Kaptchuk, Ted J., Kirsch, Irving, Raicek, Jacqueline, Lindstrom, Kara M., Berna, Chantal, Gollub, Randy L., Ingvar, Martin +1 more·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The dominant theories of human placebo effects rely on a notion that consciously perceptible cues, such as verbal information or distinct stimuli in classical conditioning, provide signals that activate placebo effects. However, growing evidence suggest that behavior can be triggered by stimuli presented outside of conscious awareness. Here, we performed two experiments in which the responses to thermal pain stimuli were assessed. The first experiment assessed whether a conditioning paradigm, using clearly visible cues for high and low pain, could induce placebo and nocebo responses. The second experiment, in a separate group of subjects, assessed whether conditioned placebo and nocebo responses could be triggered in response to nonconscious (masked) exposures to the same cues. A total of 40 healthy volunteers (24 female, mean age 23 y) were investigated in a laboratory setting. Participants rated each pain stimulus on a numeric response scale, ranging from 0 = no pain to 100 = worst imaginable pain. Significant placebo and nocebo effects were found in both experiment 1 (using clearly visible stimuli) and experiment 2 (using nonconscious stimuli), indicating that the mechanisms responsible for placebo and nocebo effects can operate without conscious awareness of the triggering cues. This is a unique experimental verification of the influence of nonconscious conditioned stimuli on placebo/nocebo effects and the results challenge the exclusive role of awareness and conscious cognitions in placebo responses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1202056109

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For Dataset 1, a sample size of 30 subjects was determined by examining previous studies investigating the effect of expectation on electrical pain and more subtle effects such as the effect of certainty or subliminally presented cue on pain intensity rating, which typically recruit 15-30 participants.

    “For Dataset 1 we determined an appropriate sample size of 30 subjects by examining previous studies investigating the effect of expectation on electrical pain and more subtle effects such as the effect of certainty or subliminally presented cue on pain intensity rating, which typically recruit 15–30 participants (Brown, Seymour, El-Deredy, & Jones, 2008; Colloca & Benedetti, 2006; Jensen, Kaptchuk”

    From Boundary effects of expectation in human pain perception (2019) · cites this paper as Jensen, Kaptchuk, Kirsch, Raicek, Lindstrom, Berna, Gollub, Ingvar, & Kong, 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Dijksterhuis A, Aarts H, Smith PK (2005) The power of the subliminal: On subliminal persuasion and other potential applications. The New Unconscious: Social Cognition and Social Neuroscience (Oxford Univ Press, New York).
  2. Phelps E (2005) The interaction of emotion and cognition: The relation between the human amygdala and cognitive awareness. The New Unconscious: Social Cognition and Social Neuroscience, eds Hassin RR, Uleman JS, Bargh JA (Oxford Univ Press, New York).
  3. Benedetti F (2009) Placebo Effects: Understanding the Mechanisms in Health and Disease (Oxford Univ Press, New York).
  4. Gracely R, Dubner R, Deeter W, Wolskee P (1985) Clinicians' expectations influence placebo analgesia. Lancet 1(8419):43.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jensen, K. B., Kaptchuk, T. J., Kirsch, I., Raicek, J., Lindstrom, K. M., Berna, C., Gollub, R. L., Ingvar, M., & Kong, J.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden; and
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-09-10
Volume
109
Issue
39
Pages
15959-15964
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1990284269
Cited by
305
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 3
FWCI
11.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R01AT006364, R03AT218317, K24AT004095, R01AT005280, R21AT004497)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
Keywords
placebo effect, nocebo effect, unconscious processes, masked stimuli, thermal pain, classical conditioning, conscious awareness, pain perception
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Pain, Placebo Effect, Pain Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review