The DOI matches its Crossref record; 129 of the 129 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System 25 Years Later: Past, Present, and Future Developments
Open accessAbstract
Context Routine symptom assessment represents the cornerstone of symptom management. Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) is one of the first quantitative symptom assessment batteries that allows for simple and rapid documentation of multiple patient-reported symptoms at the same time.Objectives To discuss the historical development of ESAS, its current uses in different settings, and future developments.Methods Narrative review.Results Since its development in 1991, ESAS has been psychometrically validated and translated into over 20 languages. We will discuss the variations, advantages, and limitations with ESAS. From the clinical perspective, ESAS is now commonly used for symptom screening and longitudinal monitoring in patients seen by palliative care, oncology, nephrology, and other disciplines in both inpatient and outpatient settings. From the research perspective, ESAS has offered important insights into the nature of symptom trajectory, symptom clusters, and symptom modulators. Furthermore, multiple clinical studies have incorporated ESAS as a study outcome and documented the impact of various interventions on symptom burden. On the horizon, multiple groups are actively investigating further refinements to ESAS, such as incorporating it in electronic health records, using ESAS as a trigger for palliative care referral, and coupling ESAS with personalized symptom goals to optimize symptom response assessment.Conclusion ESAS has evolved over the past 25 years to become an important symptom assessment instrument in both clinical practice and research. Future efforts are needed to standardize this tool and explore its full potential to support symptom management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System has been validated and translated in over 20 different languages. 115”
From Prioritizing symptom management in the treatment of chronic heart failure (2020) · cites this paper as [115]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hjermstad, M. J., Fayers, P. M., Haugen, D. F., Caraceni, A., Hanks, G. W., Loge, J. H., Fainsinger, R., Aass, N., & Kaasa, S. (2011) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016 · Cited by 2,697
Bruera, E. D., Kuehn, N., Miller, M. J., Selmser, P., & Macmillan, K. (1991) · Journal of Palliative Care · doi:10.1177/082585979100700202 · Cited by 2,686
Self-citationEarly palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: a cluster-randomised controlled trial
Zimmermann, C., Swami, N., Krzyzanowska, M., Hannon, B., Leighl, N., Oza, A., Moore, M., Rydall, A., Rodin, G., Tannock, I., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62416-2 · Cited by 1,781
Bakitas, M., Lyons, K. D., Hegel, M. T., Balan, S., Brokaw, F. C., Seville, J., Hull, J. G., Li, Z., Tosteson, T. D., Byock, I. R., et al. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1198 · Cited by 1,726
Solano, J. P., Gomes, B., & Higginson, I. J. (2006) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.06.007 · Cited by 1,191
Symptom Prevalence in Patients with Incurable Cancer: A Systematic Review
Teunissen, S. C. C. M., Wesker, W., Kruitwagen, C., de Haes, H. C. J. M., Voest, E. E., & de Graeff, A. (2007) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.10.015 · Cited by 990
Symptom prevalence, characteristics and distress in a cancer population
Portenoy, R. K., Thaler, H. T., Kornblith, A. B., Lepore, J. M., Friedlander-Klar, H., Coyle, N., Smart-Curley, T., Kemeny, N. E., Norton, L., Hoskins, W. J., et al. (1994) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/bf00435383 · Cited by 649
Walsh, D., Donnelly, S. M., & Rybicki, L. A. (2000) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s005200050281 · Cited by 620
Seow, H. Y., Barbera, L. C., Sutradhar, R., Howell, D., Dudgeon, D. J., Atzema, C. L., Liu, Y., Husain, A. F., SUSSMAN, J. S., & Earle, C. C. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2010.30.7173 · Cited by 456
Integrating palliative care into the trajectory of cancer care
Hui, D., & Bruera, E. D. (2015) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.201 · Cited by 425
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Yeşilbalkan, 2008, Validity and reliability of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale in Turkish cancer patients, Turk J Cancer, 38, 62
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Integration of oncology and palliative care: a Lancet Oncology Commission
Kaasa, S., Loge, J. H., Aapro, M., Albreht, T., Anderson, R., Bruera, E. D., Brunelli, C., Caraceni, A. T., Cervantes, A. M. R., Currow, D. C., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30415-7 · Cited by 879
Self-citationEzekowitz, J. A., O'Meara, E., McDonald, M. A., Abrams, H., Chan, M., Ducharme, A., Giannetti, N., Grzeslo, A., Hamilton, P. G., Heckman, G. A., et al. (2017) · Canadian Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2017.08.022 · Cited by 676
Cancer cachexia in adult patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines☆
Arends, J., Strasser, F., Gonella, S., Solheim, T. S., Madeddu, C., Ravasco, P., Buonaccorso, L., de van der Schueren, M. A. E., Baldwin, C., Chasen, M., et al. (2021) · ESMO Open · doi:10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100092 · Cited by 586
Murtagh, F. E., Ramsenthaler, C., Firth, A. M., Groeneveld, E. I., Lovell, N., Simon, S. T., Denzel, J., Guo, P., Bernhardt, F., Schildmann, E. K., et al. (2019) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/0269216319854264 · Cited by 413
Sanders, J. J., Curtis, J. R., & Tulsky, J. A. (2017) · Journal of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1089/jpm.2017.0459 · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Authors
- Hui, D., & Bruera, E.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hui, David
- Venue
- Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 630-643
- ISSN
- 0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5337174
- OpenAlex
- W2563130015
- Cited by
- 795
- References
- 129
- Citations by year
- 2026: 94 · 2025: 112 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 111 · 2022: 92 · 2021: 109 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 10
- FWCI
- 5.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- American Cancer Society Mentored Research
- Applied and Clinical Research (MRSG-14-1418-01-CCE)
- National Institutes of Health (R21CA186000-01A1)
- Andrew Sabin Family Fellowship
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Keywords
- Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, symptom assessment, patient-reported symptoms, symptom screening, symptom monitoring, symptom trajectories, symptom clusters, symptom burden, palliative care, psychometric validation, electronic health records, palliative care referral
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Severity of Illness Index, Symptom Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
