Cited by 990Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareCancer survivorship and care

Symptom Prevalence in Patients with Incurable Cancer: A Systematic Review

Open access
Teunissen, Saskia C.C.M., Wesker, Wendy, Kruitwagen, Cas, de Haes, Hanneke C.J.M., Voest, Emile E., de Graeff, Alexander·2007·Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

Abstract

The suffering of patients with incurable cancer is determined to a large degree by the presence and intensity of the symptoms of their disease. Knowledge of symptom prevalence is important for clinical practice. The main aim of this study was to obtain a reliable estimation of symptom prevalence in patients with incurable cancer by performing a systematic review of studies assessing this topic. We included 44 studies (including 25,074 patients) on overall symptom prevalence (Group 1) and six studies (including 2,219 patients) on symptom prevalence during the last one to two weeks of life (Group 2). In these studies, symptom prevalence was assessed by a questionnaire, a standardized interview, or the medical record. We identified 37 symptoms assessed in at least five studies. Almost all symptoms occurred in more than 10% of the patients. Five symptoms (fatigue, pain, lack of energy, weakness, and appetite loss) occurred in more than 50% of the patients of Group 1. Weight loss occurred significantly more often in Group 2 compared to Group 1, and pain, nausea, and urinary symptoms occurred significantly less often. Generally, symptom prevalence was highest if assessed by a questionnaire. The results of this study should be used to guide doctors and nurses in symptom management. Proper attention to symptom burden and suffering should be the basis for individually tailored treatment aimed at improving or maintaining quality of life of patients in their last period of life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.10.015

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teunissen, S. C. C. M., Wesker, W., Kruitwagen, C., de Haes, H. C. J. M., Voest, E. E., & de Graeff, A.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Venue
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
94-104
ISSN
0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161943291
Cited by
990
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 72 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 58
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
symptom prevalence, incurable cancer, terminal cancer, symptom burden, last days of life, fatigue, pain, weight loss, appetite loss, nausea, symptom management, quality of life
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Neoplasms, Pain, Palliative Care, Skin Diseases, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review