Cited by 35Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Don't Throw the Baby Out With the Bathwater: Meta-Analysis of Advance Care Planning and End-of-life Cancer Care

Open access
Levoy, Kristin, Sullivan, Suzanne S., Chittams, Jesse, Myers, Ruth L., Hickman, Susan E., Meghani, Salimah H.·2023·Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

Abstract

Context There is ongoing discourse about the impact of advance care planning (ACP) on end-of-life (EOL) care. No meta-analysis exists to clarify ACP's impact on patients with cancer.Objective To investigate the association between, and moderators of, ACP and aggressive vs. comfort-focused EOL care outcomes among patients with cancer.Methods Five databases were searched for peer-reviewed observational/experimental ACP-specific studies that were published between 1990-2022 that focused on samples of patients with cancer. Odds ratios were pooled to estimate overall effects using inverse variance weighting.Results Of 8,673 articles, 21 met criteria, representing 33,541 participants and 68 effect sizes (54 aggressive, 14 comfort-focused). ACP was associated with significantly lower odds of chemotherapy, intensive care, hospital admissions, hospice use fewer than seven days, hospital death, and aggressive care composite measures. ACP was associated with 1.51 times greater odds of do-not-resuscitate orders. Other outcomes-cardiopulmonary resuscitation, emergency department admissions, mechanical ventilation, and hospice use-were not impacted. Tests of moderation revealed that the communication components of ACP produced greater reductions in the odds of hospital admissions compared to other components of ACP (e.g., documents); and, observational studies, not experimental, produced greater odds of hospice use.Conclusion This meta-analysis demonstrated mixed evidence of the association between ACP and EOL cancer care, where tests of moderation suggested that the communication components of ACP carry more weight in influencing outcomes. Further disease-specific efforts to clarify models and components of ACP that work and matter to patients and caregivers will advance the field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.02.003

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Advance care planning has been associated with earlier and increased use of hospice care, reduced intensive treatment and hospitalizations at the end of life, and better quality of life in patients with cancer and caregivers.

    “Advance care planning has been associated with earlier and increased use of hospice care [12–15], reduced intensive treatment and hospitalizations at the end of life [13, 15–18], and better quality of life in patients with cancer and caregivers [12, 19].”

    From Mindfulness to enhance quality of life and support advance care planning: a pilot randomized controlled trial for adults with advanced cancer and their family caregivers. (2024) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Results section reports that advance care planning was associated with lower odds of chemotherapy, ICU admission, hospital admission, and hospice stays shorter than seven days in patients with cancer. It does not establish increased hospice use overall: the Comfort-focused EOL Care Outcomes section reports a nonsignificant overall association, although observational studies showed an association. The paper does not report improved quality of life for patients with cancer and caregivers as a finding of this meta-analysis. No page numbers were supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [33]Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M, eds. Publication bias in meta-analysis: prevention, assessment and adjustments. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2005.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levoy, K., Sullivan, S. S., Chittams, J., Myers, R. L., Hickman, S. E., & Meghani, S. H.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Health (US)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
  • Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (US)
Corresponding author
Levoy, Kristin
Venue
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-06
Volume
65
Issue
6
Pages
e715-e743
ISSN
0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319786297
Cited by
35
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (F31 NR016394, T32 NR009356)
  • National Library of Medicine (T15 LM012495)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • American Cancer Society (131753-DSCN-18-072-SCN)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01 AG056618, R01 AG057733, R01 NR017853, R03 AG067159, R33 AG057353)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01 CA270483)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
advance care planning, end-of-life care, cancer patients, aggressive care, comfort care, hospitalization, hospice use, do-not-resuscitate orders, chemotherapy, intensive care, in-hospital mortality
MeSH terms
Death, Hospices, Humans, Neoplasms, Terminal Care, Hospice Care, Advance Care Planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review