CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 32Innovations in Medical EducationElectronic Health Records SystemsSocial Media in Health Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

e-Professionalism: Challenges in the Age of Information

Open access
Spector, Nancy D., Matz, Paul S., Levine, Leonard J., Gargiulo, Katherine A., McDonald, Matthew B., McGregor, Robert S.·2010·The Journal of Pediatrics
DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.12.047
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.12.047

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although much has been written and discussed about professionalism, e-professionalism has not been addressed because lapses in professionalism in the electronic realm are just beginning to be appreciated.

    “Despite these strides, Spector et al. 3 concluded that although much has been written and discussed about professionalism, e-professionalism has not been addressed because lapses in professionalism in the electronic realm are just beginning to be appreciated.”

    From e-Professionalism: A New Frontier in Medical Education (2013) · cites this paper as [3]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. American Medical Association. Guidelines for Physician-Patient Electronic Communications. Available at: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/about-ama/our-people/member-groups-sections/young-physicians-section/advocacy-resources/guidelines-physician-patient-electronic-communications.shtml. Accessed November 19, 2009.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Spector, N. D., Matz, P. S., Levine, L. J., Gargiulo, K. A., McDonald, M. B., & McGregor, R. S.
Affiliations
St. Christopher's Hospital for Children (US)
Corresponding author
Spector, Nancy D.
ORCID
Venue
The Journal of Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
156
Issue
3
Pages
345-346
ISSN
0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.12.047
OpenAlex
W2125320637
Semantic Scholar
3d680ca28a13387ef74c504ad14a609d82b694b3
Cited by
32
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
Keywords
e-professionalism, medical professionalism, disruptive technologies, organizational change, health technology, medical culture, information age, physician communication
MeSH terms
Behavior, Communication, Education, Medical, Graduate, Humans, Pediatrics, Professional Competence, Internet, Electronic Mail

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review