Cited by 24Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersClinical practice guidelines implementationClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

The Availability and the Adherence to Pediatric Guidelines for the Management of Syncope in the Emergency Department

Raucci, Umberto, Scateni, Simona, Tozzi, Alberto Eugenio, Drago, Fabrizio, Giordano, Ugo, Marcias, Michela, Faa, Francesca, Reale, Antonino·2014·The Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the impact of the 2009 Italian pediatric clinical guidelines on the management of syncope. Study design A retrospective study of patients who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) of Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital with syncope during the 2 years before and then for 2 years after the establishment of the Italian pediatric clinical guidelines. Implementation of the clinical guidelines included educational seminars, additional training of health care workers, and the availability of clinical guidelines and its algorithms on ED examination rooms. Results We studied a population of 1073 patients (n = 470 vs n = 603). Most patients had neurocardiogenic syncope with a greater increase in postimplementation period (n = 241, 51.3% vs n = 454, 49.8%); we also noticed a parallel reduction of the number of patients with undefined syncope (30% vs 8.3%). We observed an increase in electrocardiogram (n = 328, 69.8% vs n = 512, 85.1%; P Conclusions Providing practitioners in the ED with age-oriented clinical guidelines increased the efficiency of clinical management of pediatric syncope. Our study demonstrated that the implementation of pediatric clinical guidelines on syncope improve diagnosis, reduce hospital admissions, and decrease the use of unnecessary diagnostic tests.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.06.064

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decision support algorithms may reduce health service use in the evaluation of syncope.

    “Decision support algorithms may reduce health service use in the evaluation of syncope (Figures 1 and 2) (105,111–113), although there are currently insufficient data to advocate the use of specific decision support algorithms for making disposition decisions.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raucci, U., Scateni, S., Tozzi, A. E., Drago, F., Giordano, U., Marcias, M., Faa, F., & Reale, A.
Affiliations
Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IT)
Corresponding author
Raucci, Umberto
Venue
The Journal of Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
165
Issue
5
Pages
967-972.e1
ISSN
0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039014632
Cited by
24
References
37
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
pediatric syncope, guideline implementation, vasovagal syncope, emergency department management, diagnostic testing utilization, hospitalization reduction, unnecessary testing, guideline adherence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Infant, Italy, Male, Retrospective Studies, Syncope, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures, Guideline Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review