Cited by 73Herpesvirus Infections and TreatmentsNeonatal and Maternal InfectionsCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research

Initial Presentation of Neonatal Herpes Simplex Virus Infection

Curfman, Alison L., Glissmeyer, Eric W., Ahmad, Fahd A., Korgenski, E. Kent, Blaschke, Anne J., Byington, Carrie L., Miller, Aaron S.·2016·The Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

Objective To inform the decision to test and empirically treat for herpes simplex virus (HSV) by describing the initial clinical presentation and laboratory findings of infants with a confirmed diagnosis of neonatal HSV.Study design This is a retrospective case series performed at 2 pediatric tertiary care centers. Infants who developed symptoms prior to 42 days of age with laboratory confirmed HSV from 2002 through 2012 were included. We excluded infants <34 weeks gestation, those who developed illness before discharge from their birth hospital, and those who developed symptoms after 42 days of age.Results We identified 49 infants with HSV meeting these criteria. Most infants (43/49, 88%) came to medical attention at ≤28 days. Of 49 infants, 22 (45%) had disseminated, 16 (33%) central nervous system, and 10 (20%) skin, eye, mouth HSV disease. Eight infants (16%) had nonspecific presentations without the classic signs of seizure, vesicular rash, or critical illness (intensive care admission). All infants with nonspecific presentation were ≤14 days, had cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis, or both.Conclusions The majority of infants with HSV (84%) presented with seizure, vesicular rash, or critical illness. A subset of patients (16%) lacked classic signs at hospitalization; most manifested signs suggestive of HSV within 24 hours. Further studies are needed to validate the risk factors identified in this study including age <14 days and cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis at presentation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.02.015

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Curfman, A. L., Glissmeyer, E. W., Ahmad, F. A., Korgenski, E. K., Blaschke, A. J., Byington, C. L., & Miller, A. S.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Intermountain Healthcare (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Saint Louis University (US)
Corresponding author
Curfman, Alison L.
Venue
The Journal of Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
172
Pages
121-126.e1
ISSN
0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2291730712
Cited by
73
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3
FWCI
9.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (T32HD049338)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
Keywords
neonatal herpes simplex virus infection, clinical features, seizures, vesicular rash, cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis, empiric antiviral therapy, early diagnosis, risk factors
MeSH terms
Female, Herpes Simplex, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Retrospective Studies, Simplexvirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review