Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 485

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inner filter effect in fluorescence spectroscopy: As a problem and as a solution

Kumar Panigrahi, Suraj, Kumar Mishra, Ashok·2019·Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews

Abstract

Abstract This article discusses three aspects of inner filter effect (IFE) in fluorescence spectroscopy. (i) First, IFE as undesirable in fluorescence measurements: IFE results in non-linear fluorescence response of the analyte under study and it has been verified that IFE cannot be eliminated; it can either be minimized or corrected for intensity loss. Over the years, researchers have proposed many intensity correction methods to avoid IFE related issues. Often analysts using fluorescence spectroscopy, knowingly or unknowingly, ignore IFE or use an inappropriate intensity correction method. Herein, we have highlighted the basis and significances of various correction models that are proposed since 1970s to till date. (ii) Second, IFE mediated concentration dependent red shift (CDRS) as an analytical tool: the conventional fluorescence measurements and IFE correction strategies cannot be applied in analysis of optically dense multi-fluorophoric samples like oils, petrochemicals, biological samples and food samples etc. The strategy for exclusive inclusion of IFE and IFE induced CDRS as characteristics of the system for development of fluorescence based assay, towards maximizing fluorescence sensitivity of optically dense multi-fluorophoric systems, have been discussed. (iii) Third, IFE based sensing: when the sample contains chromophores, which absorb either at the excitation or at the emission wavelength range of the fluorophore, then the chromophores act as a filter. Thus tuning either the absorber or fluorophore concentration will lead to development of fluorescence based assay for a selective analyte. Principles and protocols are described to identify whether a sensing event is due to IFE or any other fluorescence mechanism. Additionally, a brief description is given on advanced findings and progresses made in sensing of for various classes of analytes in the recent past, using IFE concept. The second and third aspect combined together serve as a tool towards enhancing sensitivity of fluorescence measurement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2019.100318

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 95 references

Cited by

See all 485

Metadata

Authors
Kumar Panigrahi, S., & Kumar Mishra, A.
Venue
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
41
Pages
100318
ISSN
1389-5567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2972600456
Cited by
485
References
95
FWCI
21.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inner filter effect in fluorescence spectroscopy: As a problem and as a solution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2019.100318
The paper
Kumar Panigrahi, S., & Kumar Mishra, A. (2019). Inner filter effect in fluorescence spectroscopy: As a problem and as a solution. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2019.100318

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.