Neural dynamics as sampling: a model for stochastic computation in recurrent networks of spiking neurons
Open accessAbstract
The organization of computations in networks of spiking neurons in the brain is still largely unknown, in particular in view of the inherently stochastic features of their firing activity and the experimentally observed trial-to-trial variability of neural systems in the brain. In principle there exists a powerful computational framework for stochastic computations, probabilistic inference by sampling, which can explain a large number of macroscopic experimental data in neuroscience and cognitive science. But it has turned out to be surprisingly difficult to create a link between these abstract models for stochastic computations and more detailed models of the dynamics of networks of spiking neurons. Here we create such a link and show that under some conditions the stochastic firing activity of networks of spiking neurons can be interpreted as probabilistic inference via Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling. Since common methods for MCMC sampling in distributed systems, such as Gibbs sampling, are inconsistent with the dynamics of spiking neurons, we introduce a different approach based on non-reversible Markov chains that is able to reflect inherent temporal processes of spiking neuronal activity through a suitable choice of random variables. We propose a neural network model and show by a rigorous theoretical analysis that its neural activity implements MCMC sampling of a given distribution, both for the case of discrete and continuous time. This provides a step towards closing the gap between abstract functional models of cortical computation and more detailed models of networks of spiking neurons.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper shows that stochastic firing in recurrent networks of spiking neurons can implement probabilistic inference via Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling, including discrete- and continuous-time formulations. It introduces non-reversible MCMC dynamics to accommodate finite-duration PSPs and refractory mechanisms, and demonstrates the approach in simulations including a model of perceptual multistability.
Key findings
- Under a neural computability condition—where a neuron’s membrane potential equals the log-odds of its binary variable being active—the network’s stochastic spiking dynamics can sample from a given distribution; for the absolute-refractory discrete-time model, Theorem 1 proves the joint distribution is the unique invariant distribution of the transition operator.
- The model uses irreversible Markov chains, unlike Gibbs sampling, to incorporate finite-duration postsynaptic potentials and refractory effects; a continuous-time version is also shown to sample from the correct distribution.
- For the relative-refractory model, only “local” correctness is proven, but simulations with K=10 variables and 100 randomly generated Boltzmann distributions indicate the approximation error is orders of magnitude below a fully factorized distribution when statistical dependencies are present.
- In a perceptual multistability simulation with 217 neurons, clamping 8 of 217 neurons produced a bimodal posterior distribution; dominance durations were approximated by a Gamma distribution, and the spike response was sparse, asynchronous, and irregular.
Methods
- Theoretical analysis: binary random variables are represented by spikes lasting a fixed duration τ, with auxiliary variables tracking spike timing; transition operators are defined and analyzed via Lemmata 1–10, with Boltzmann distributions used as a concrete distribution class.
- Simulations: networks of 3, 40, and 217 neurons sampled from Boltzmann distributions; the first 1 s of simulated time was discarded as burn-in; neural sampling was compared to Gibbs sampling, and approximation quality was measured by Kullback-Leibler divergence, including tests with relative refractory mechanisms and alpha-shaped additive PSPs.
- Multistability model: 217 orientation-selective neurons on a hexagonal grid were trained as a fully visible Boltzmann machine using contrastive divergence; ambiguous input was applied by clamping 8 of 217 neurons, and population-vector decoding was used to visualize network states and measure dominance durations.
Limitations
- Stated: the relative-refractory model is only proven to be “locally correct,” and the paper cannot prove in general that the global network samples from the target distribution; simulations suggest the error is small. The continuous-time relative-refractory version has the same limitation.
- Stated: replacing theoretically ideal rectangular, renewal PSPs with more realistic alpha-shaped, additive PSPs yields a clearly higher Kullback-Leibler divergence to the true distribution, though it still captures dependencies better than a fully factorized approximation.
- Stated: the input model via clamping is simplistic, zero-contrast stimuli require more modeling, and the work makes simplifying assumptions about neural processes such as step-function PSPs; integrating multiple biological time constants remains an open problem. The discrete-time model also assumes a fixed sequential update order, described as a severe restriction that is overcome in continuous time.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 17 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
The proposed neural network model implements MCMC sampling of a given distribution in a spiking neural network, both for discrete and continuous time.
“We propose a neural network model and show by a rigorous theoretical analysis that its neural activity implements MCMC sampling of a given distribution, both for the case of discrete and continuous time.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“Formally speaking, our model implements Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling in a spiking neural network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
- Findingnone given
The proposed family of network models can be shown to exactly sample from any arbitrary member of a well-defined class of probability distributions via their inherent network dynamics.
“we propose here a family of network models, that can be shown to exactly sample from any arbitrary member of a well-defined class of probability distributions via their inherent network dynamics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
If a subset of variables are observed (clamped), the remaining network samples from the conditional distribution of the remaining variables given the observables.
“If a subset of the variables are observed, modelled as the corresponding neurons being “clamped” to the observed values, the remaining network samples from the conditional distribution of the remaining variables given the observables.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Each stochastic state transition operator leaves the given distribution invariant.
“It can be shown that each of these stochastic state transition operators leaves the given distribution invariant, i.e., satisfies equation (1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
In contrast to prior approaches, the model incorporates irreversible dynamics (i.e., no detailed balance) allowing for finite time PSPs and refractory mechanisms.
“In contrast to prior approaches however, our model incorporates irreversible dynamics (i.e., no detailed balance) allowing for finite time PSPs and refractory mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingreasoning
For a Boltzmann distribution, the neural computability condition is satisfied by neurons with the standard membrane potential (6).
“For the Boltzmann distribution, condition (4) is satisfied by neurons with the standard membrane potential(6)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The membrane potential of a neuron at time t equals the log-odds of the corresponding binary variable being active (the neural computability condition).
- Findingcitation
Spiking network models with standard membrane potential can emulate any Boltzmann machine.
“As shown below, these spiking network models can emulate any Boltzmann machine (BM) [36].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] DH Ackley, 1985, A learning algorithm for boltzmann machines., Cogn Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning
The neural sampling process has the Markov property only with regard to the auxiliary variables.
“The neural sampling process has the Markov property only with regard to these more informative auxiliary variables .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Under a certain computability assumption, a network of spiking neurons can sample from a given joint distribution over binary variables using its inherent stochastic dynamics.
“We will show that under a certain computability assumption on a network consisting of spiking neurons can sample from using its inherent stochastic dynamics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The membrane potential of a neuron at time t equals the log-odds of the corresponding binary variable being active (the neural computability condition).
- Findingreasoning
Once stochastic dynamics converge to invariant distribution, the averaged firing rate of neuron i is proportional to the desired marginal probability.
“Then, as soon as the stochastic dynamics of has converged to its invariant distribution, the averaged firing rate of neuron is proportional to the following desired marginal probability”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The simulated network features a sparse, irregular spike response.
“The network features a sparse, irregular spike response with average firing rate of .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Statistics computed from the model match experimentally observed statistics well.
“In general, the statistics computed from the model match experimentally observed statistics well.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
To represent the correct distribution over x conditioned on others, the neuron continuously adapts its instantaneous firing rate.
“To represent the correct distribution over conditioned on , the neuron continuously adapts its instantaneous firing rate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
For any refractory function, there always exists a continuous, monotonic function which satisfies equation (11).
“One can show that, for any as above, there always exists a continuous, monotonic function which satisfies this equation (see Lemma 0 in Methods).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The standard activation function is the solution of equation (11) for the absolute refractory function.
“It is worth noticing that the standard activation function is the solution of equation (11) for the absolute refractory function, i.e., for and for .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
If the sigmoidal activation function is replaced by a different activation function, one can still prove that sampling is "locally correct" as specified in equation (12).
“Nevertheless, if the sigmoidal activation function is replaced by a different activation function , one can still prove that the sampling is “locally correct”, as specified in equation (12) below.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Networks consisting of neurons with relative refractory mechanism approximate the desired target distributions faithfully over a large range of distribution parameters.
“In the Methods section, we present further simulation results showing that the proposed networks consisting of neurons with relative refractory mechanism approximate the desired target distributions faithfully over a large range of distribution parameters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The unique invariant distribution of the relative refractory transition operator gives rise to the correct marginal distribution over x.
“In Lemma 0 in Methods it is proven that the unique invariant distribution of , denoted as , gives rise to the correct marginal distribution over , i.e.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
If several neurons in the network change their states in a short interval of time, the joint distribution over x is in general not the desired one.
“If however, several neurons in the network change their states in a short interval of time, the joint distribution over is in general not the desired one, i.e., , where denotes the invariant distribution of .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In simulations, stochastic deviations of estimated probabilities due to finite samples are small and comparable to systematic deviations due to only locally correct computation of neurons with relative refractory mechanism.
“Stochastic deviations of the estimated probabilities due to the finite number of samples are quite small (typical errors ) and are comparable to systematic deviations due to the only locally correct computation of neurons with relative refractory mechanism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Simulation results indicate that the error of the approximation to the desired Boltzmann distributions introduced by neural sampling with relative refractory mechanism is rather minute.
“In the Methods section, we present simulation results that indicate that the error of the approximation to the desired Boltzmann distributions introduced by neural sampling with relative refractory mechanism is rather minute.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
For the relative refractory model, one can no longer prove that a network of such neurons samples from the desired distribution p.
“The introduction of this more complex neuron model comes at the price that one can no longer prove that a network of such neurons samples from the desired distribution .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The neural sampling approximation error is orders of magnitude below the one introduced by a fully factorized distribution.
“It is shown that the neural sampling approximation error is orders of magnitudes below the one introduced by a fully factorized distribution (which amounts to assuming correct marginal distributions and independent neurons).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The sampling process is expressed in the neural network model by a sparse, asynchronous and irregular spike response.
“One sees that the sampling process is expressed in this neural network model by a sparse, asynchronous and irregular spike response.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In simulations, the onset of a sensory stimulus reduces the variability of firing activity, which represents a conditional distribution rather than the prior distribution after stimulus onset.
“Using this admittedly quite simplistic model of the input, we observed in simulations that our network model exhibits the following property: The onset of a sensory stimulus reduces the variability of the firing activity, which represents (after stimulus onset) a conditional distribution, rather than the prior distribution (see the difference between panels D and E of Figure 5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
More realistic alpha-shaped, additive EPSPs are compatible with the functionality of the proposed network model.
“Furthermore, we have presented simulation results suggesting that more realistic alpha-shaped, additive EPSPs are compatible with the functionality of the proposed network model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The distribution of dominance durations in the model can be approximated quite well by a Gamma distribution.
“This distribution can be approximated quite well by a Gamma distribution, which also provides a good fit to experimental data (see the discussion in [18]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The orientation of the population vector corresponds to the dominant orientation of the percept, and its distance from the origin encodes the strength of this percept.
- Findingown data
With ambiguous input, the network spends most of the time in network states corresponding to one of the two simultaneously presented input orientations and virtually no time on orientations in between.
“One clearly sees that the network spends most of the time in network states that correspond to one of the two simultaneously presented input orientations ( and ), and virtually no time on orientations in between.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The neurons in the network represent neurons in the visual system that have roughly the same or neighboring receptive field, and each neuron receives visual input from either the left or the right eye.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The orientation of the population vector corresponds to the dominant orientation of the percept, and its distance from the origin encodes the strength of this percept.
- Findingown data
In computer simulations, the two temporal processes considered (refractory processes and postsynaptic potentials) can approximately be decoupled.
“We have gone one first step in this direction by showing that in computer simulations the two temporal processes that we have considered (refractory processes and postsynaptic potentials) can approximately be decoupled.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The simulated firing statistics are in accordance with experimentally observed data.
“The simulated data is in accordance with experimentally observed data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A focus of network activity on the two orientations given by the external input can be achieved in this model despite only two neurons being clamped for each of them.
“It is furthermore notable, that a focus of the network activity on the two orientations that are given by the external input can be achieved in this model, in spite of the fact that only two of the neurons were clamped for each of them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The neurons in the network represent neurons in the visual system that have roughly the same or neighboring receptive field, and each neuron receives visual input from either the left or the right eye.
- Findingown data
The average firing rate when sampling from the posterior distribution is only slightly higher than the average firing rate of spontaneous activity.
“It is worth mentioning that the average firing rate when sampling from the posterior distribution is only slightly higher than the average firing rate of spontaneous activity ( and respectively), which is reminiscent of related experimental data [7].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
is an invariant distribution of .
“Lemma 8. is an invariant distribution of , i.e., it is a solution to the invariant Fokker-Planck equation:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The state space of is for .
- Findingreasoning
Due to the structured recurrent weights, the experimentally measured tuning curves were reasonably close to the tuning curves used for external stimulation.
“Due to the structured recurrent weights, the experimentally measured tuning curves were found to be reasonably close to the tuning curves used for external stimulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The variables are observed with iid. uniformly in if and otherwise.
- Findingown data
For Boltzmann distributions with intermediate weights (), there are substantial statistical dependencies between the random variables.
“distributions with intermediate weights () show substantial statistical dependencies between RVs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The absolute refractory model provides the best results due to the theoretical guarantee to sample from the correct distribution.
“The absolute refractory model provides the best results as we expected due to the theoretical guarantee to sample from the correct distribution (the non-zero Kullback-Leibler divergence is caused by the estimation from a finite number of samples).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
For any continuous, non-negative function with for , there exists a unique function with property (16).
“Lemma 9. Let be a continuous, non-negative function with for . There exists a unique function with the following property : (16)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The state space of is for .
- Findingreasoning
Relative refractory models are much more accurate approximations than fully factorized distributions if substantial statistical dependencies between the random variables are present.
“These relative refractory models are characterized by the theory to be “locally correct” and turn out to be much more accurate approximations than fully factorized distributions if substantial statistical dependencies between the RVs are present (i.e., , ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Most of the neurons responded in a highly irregular manner with a CV .
“Most of the neurons responded in a highly irregular manner with a CV .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Networks consisting of neurons with relative refractory mechanisms, with only "locally" correct sampling, also provide a close fit to the true distribution compared to a fully factorized approximation.
“Networks consisting of neurons with relative refractory mechanisms, with only “locally” correct sampling, also provide a close fit to the true distribution (see inset) compared to a fully factorized approximation (assuming correct marginals and independent variables).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Applying an ambiguous cue led to a bimodal posterior distribution.
“This led to a bimodal posterior distribution as shown in panel (E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The variables are observed with iid. uniformly in if and otherwise.
- Findingown data
Sampling networks with more realistic, alpha-shaped, additive PSPs still fit the true distribution reasonably well.
“Furthermore, it can be seen that sampling networks with more realistic, alpha-shaped, additive PSPs still fit the true distribution reasonably well.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The models with relative refractory mechanism provide faithful approximations for all values of the hyperparameter considered here.
“The models with relative refractory mechanism provide faithful approximations for all values of the hyperparameter considered here.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Networks with absolute refractory mechanism provide the best approximation.
“Networks with absolute refractory mechanism provide the best approximation (as expected from theoretical guarantees).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The operator leaves the conditional distribution invariant with .
“Lemma 7. The operator leaves the conditional distribution invariant with , i.e.:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The state space of is for .
- Findingown data
Systematic deviations due to the relative refractory mechanism are on the same order as the effect of estimating from finite samples.
“Systematic deviations due to the relative refractory mechanism are on the same order as the effect of estimating from finite samples (as can be seen, e.g., from a comparison with the absolute refractory model which has 0 systematic error).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Kullback-Leibler divergence to the true distribution is clearly higher for additive, alpha-shaped PSPs compared to renewed, rectangular PSPs.
“The Kullback-Leibler divergence to the true distribution is clearly higher compared to the case of renewed, rectangular PSPs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
For very large weights (), the probability mass of the distributions is concentrated on very few states (usually 90% on less than 10 out of the states).
“For very large weights (), the probability mass of the distributions is concentrated on very few states (usually 90% on less than 10 out of the states).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
For all the invariant distribution of the operator fulfills .
“Lemma 10. For all the invariant distribution of the operator fulfills .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The state space of is for .
- Findingown data
The sampling network represented the bimodal distribution by encoding either global percept separately: the trace of network states roamed in one mode for multiple steps before quickly crossing the state space towards the opposite percept.
“The sampling network represented this distribution by encoding either global perception separately: The trace of network states roamed in one mode for multiple steps before quickly crossing the state space towards the opposite percept.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The variables are observed with iid. uniformly in if and otherwise.
- Findingreasoning
A late recovery of the refractory function is beneficial for the approximation quality of the model as it is closer to an absolute refractory mechanism.
“As expected, a late recovery of the refractory function is beneficial for the approximation quality of the model as it is closer to an absolute refractory mechanism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The paper introduces a different approach based on non-reversible Markov chains that reflects inherent temporal processes of spiking neuronal activity through a suitable choice of random variables.
“we introduce a different approach based on non-reversible Markov chains that is able to reflect inherent temporal processes of spiking neuronal activity through a suitable choice of random variables.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Common methods for MCMC sampling in distributed systems, such as Gibbs sampling, are inconsistent with the dynamics of spiking neurons.
“Since common methods for MCMC sampling in distributed systems, such as Gibbs sampling, are inconsistent with the dynamics of spiking neurons, we introduce a different approach based on non-reversible Markov chains that is able to reflect inherent temporal processes of spiking neuronal activity through a suitable choice of random variables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Under some conditions, the stochastic firing activity of networks of spiking neurons can be interpreted as probabilistic inference via Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling.
“Here we create such a link and show that under some conditions the stochastic firing activity of networks of spiking neurons can be interpreted as probabilistic inference via Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The binary vector defined by network activity at time t does not fully capture the internal state of the stochastic system; additional non-binary auxiliary variables are needed.
“An obvious consequence of this definition is that the binary vector that is defined by the activity of at time does not fully capture the internal state of this stochastic system. Rather, one needs to take into account additional non-binary variables , where the value of at time specifies when within the time interval the neuron has fired (if it has fired within this time interval, thereby causing”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Experimental data suggests that neurons, synapses, and neural systems are inherently stochastic, especially in vivo.
“Experimental data suggests that neurons, synapses, and neural systems are inherently stochastic [1], especially in vivo, and therefore seem less suitable for implementing deterministic computations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] ET Rolls, 2010, The Noisy Brain: Stochastic Dynamics as a Principle of Brain Function.
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
External stimuli only modulate the highly stochastic spontaneous firing activity of cortical networks of neurons.
“several experimental studies arrive at the conclusion that external stimuli only modulate the highly stochastic spontaneous firing activity of cortical networks of neurons [7], [8].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [7] J Fiser, 2004, Small modulation of ongoing cortical dynamics by sensory input during natural vision., Nature source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] DL Ringach, 2009, Spontaneous and driven cortical activity: implications for computation., Curr Opin Neurobiol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The model is more biologically realistic than Boltzmann machine sampling approaches because it incorporates inherent temporal dynamics and spike-based communication of a network of spiking neurons.
“It is similar to sampling approaches which have already been applied extensively, e.g., in Boltzmann machines, however our model is more biologically realistic as it incorporates aspects of the inherent temporal dynamics and spike-based communication of a network of spiking neurons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Any composition or mixture of these operators also leaves the distribution invariant.
“This implies that any composition or mixture of these operators also leaves invariant, see, e.g., [38].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] C Andrieu, 2003, An introduction to MCMC for machine learning., Mach Learn source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Previous network models that implement sampling in neural networks are mostly based on Gibbs (or general Metropolis-Hastings) sampling.
“Previous network models that implement sampling in neural networks are mostly based on a special sampling algorithm called Gibbs (or general Metropolis-Hastings) sampling [9], [17], [18], [37].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [9] S Geman, 1984, Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images., IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] R Sundareswara, 2008, Perceptual multistability predicted by search model for bayesian decisions., J Vis source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18] SJ Gershman, 2009, Perceptual multistability as Markov chain Monte Carlo inference.
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The local computation performed by such a neuron can be considered correct.
“Hence the “local” computation performed by such neuron can be considered as correct.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The continuous-time stochastically spiking neural network model's states represent correct samples from the desired probability distribution at any time.
“Here we propose a stochastically spiking neural network model in continuous time, whose states still represent correct samples from the desired probability distribution at any time .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The irreducibility and aperiodicity of A ensures that p is the unique invariant distribution of the Markov chain defined by A, i.e., irrespective of initial network state successive application explores the whole state space non-periodically.
“The statement that (which is composed of the operators ) is irreducible and aperiodic ensures that is the unique invariant distribution of the Markov chain defined by , i.e., that irrespective of the initial network state the successive application of explores the whole state space in a non-periodic manner.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
By clamping observed neurons, the network can sample from the posterior distribution over remaining variables given observed values.
“For example, can be used to sample from the posterior distribution over given . One just needs to clamp those neurons to the corresponding observed values.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The network can carry out probabilistic inference for the distribution p.
“Furthermore, the network can carry out probabilistic inference for this distribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
After sufficient burn-in (infinite limit), the dynamics given by transition operator A produce samples from distribution p.
“This theorem guarantees that after a sufficient “burn-in” time (more precisely in the limit of an infinite “burn-in” time), the dynamics of the network, which are given by the transition operator , produce samples from the distribution .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A neuron whose dynamics is described by the relative refractory operator samples from the correct distribution if it receives a static input from other neurons, i.e., as long as its membrane potential is constant.
“This means that a neuron whose dynamics is described by samples from the correct distribution if it receives a static input from the other neurons in the network, i.e., as long as its membrane potential is constant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A large number of different probabilistic inferences can be carried out efficiently in parallel by readout neurons that receive spike input from different subsets of neurons in the network.
“Thus, a large number of different probabilistic inferences can be carried out efficiently in parallel by readout neurons that receive spike input from different subsets of neurons in the network .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The spiking network represents the target probability distribution with high accuracy.
“The tight match between both distributions suggests that the spiking network represents the target probability distribution with high accuracy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Rather realistic neural dynamics can support computational functions rigorously formalized as inference via sampling.
“The main point of the modelling study is to show that rather realistic neural dynamics can support computational functions rigorously formalized as inference via sampling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
On the basis of overall network activity, it is indistinguishable whether the network carries out an inference task or freely samples from its prior distribution.
“Thus on the basis of the overall network activity it is indistinguishable whether the network carries out an inference task or freely samples from its prior distribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
For the continuous-time relative refractory sampler, each neuron locally performs the correct computation under the assumption of static input from the remaining neurons.
“It is shown that each neuron “locally” performs the correct computation under the assumption of static input from the remaining neurons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
For the continuous-time relative refractory sampler, one can no longer prove in general that the global network samples from the target distribution.
“However one can no longer prove in general that the global network samples from the target distribution .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
The perceptual system of humans and nonhuman primates does not produce a superposition of different possible percepts of an ambiguous stimulus, but switches between different self-consistent global percepts spontaneously.
“The most important finding is that the perceptual system of humans and nonhuman primates does not produce a superposition of different possible percepts of an ambiguous stimulus, but rather switches between different self-consistent global percepts in a spontaneous manner.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The approach presented here can be interpreted as a biologically more realistic version of Gibbs sampling for a specific class of probability distributions by taking into account spike-based communication, finite duration PSPs and refractory mechanisms.
“The approach presented here can be interpreted as a biologically more realistic version of Gibbs sampling for a specific class of probability distributions by taking into account a spike-based communication, finite duration PSPs and refractory mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
For all i, the operator T_i leaves the conditional distribution invariant.
“Lemma 2. For all the operator leaves the conditional distribution invariant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
p* is the unique invariant distribution of operator T.
“Theorem 1. is the unique invariant distribution of operator .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The time-invariant distribution of the continuous-time model gives rise to the desired marginal distribution over the binary variables.
“In the Methods section we prove that the resulting time invariant distribution, i.e., the distribution that solves , now denoted as it is not a function of time, gives rise to the desired marginal distribution over :(14)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The model provides one possible neural implementation of the inference-by-sampling paradigm.
“The model, based on assumptions about the underlying probability distribution (formalized by the neural computability condition) as well as on certain assumptions regarding the underlying MCMC model, provides one possible neural implementation of the “inference-by-sampling paradigm” emerging in computational neuroscience.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
For all i, the operator T_i leaves the distribution p* invariant.
“Lemma 3. For all the operator leaves the distribution invariant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The experimentally observed stability of percepts on the time scale of seconds suggests that perception can be interpreted as probabilistic inference carried out by MCMC sampling producing successively correlated samples.
“Furthermore, the experimentally observed fact that percepts tend to be stable on the time scale of seconds suggests that perception can be interpreted as probabilistic inference that is carried out by MCMC sampling which produces successively correlated samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
A theoretically rigorous probabilistic inference process can be carried out by a network of spiking neurons with a spike raster similar to generic recorded data.
“Altogether this figure shows that a theoretically rigorous probabilistic inference process can be carried out by a network of spiking neurons with a spike raster that is similar to generic recorded data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In the limit of the discrete time step approaching zero, the discrete-time sampler becomes equal to the continuous-time system, which updates all units in parallel.
“In the limit of approaching , the probability that two or more neurons will fire at the same time approaches , and the discrete time sampler becomes equal to the continuous time system defined above, which updates all units in parallel.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The continuous-time spiking model performs sampling from a given probability distribution.
“We have also presented a model of spiking dynamics in continuous time that performs sampling from a given probability distribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The network's behavior with ambiguous input implements a sampling process from a bimodal conditional distribution.
“This implements a sampling process from a bimodal conditional distribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The neurons in the network represent neurons in the visual system that have roughly the same or neighboring receptive field, and each neuron receives visual input from either the left or the right eye.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The orientation of the population vector corresponds to the dominant orientation of the percept, and its distance from the origin encodes the strength of this percept.
- Interpretationown data
The previously described model for neural sampling could in principle fill the gap, providing a modelling framework consistent with the dynamics of networks of spiking neurons and understandable as probabilistic inference through MCMC sampling.
“We have demonstrated in a computer simulation that the previously described model for neural sampling could in principle fill this gap, providing a modelling framework that is on the one hand consistent with the dynamics of networks of spiking neurons, and which can on the other hand also be clearly understood from the perspective of probabilistic inference through MCMC sampling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The neuron model with relative refractory mechanism does not entail the correct overall invariant distribution .
“As stated before, the neuron model with relative refractory mechanism does not entail the correct overall invariant distribution .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The theory for the neuron model with a relative refractory mechanism only shows that the sampling process is "locally correct", i.e., that it would yield correct conditional distributions for each individual neuron if the state of the remaining network stayed constant.
“In contrast, the theory for the neuron model with a relative refractory mechanism only shows that the sampling process is “locally correct”, i.e., that it would yield correct conditional distributions for each individual neuron if the state of the remaining network stayed constant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Neurons with high firing rates had a slightly lower CV due to the increased influence of the refractory mechanism.
“Neurons with high firing rates had a slightly lower CV due to the increased influence of the refractory mechanism”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The joint distribution over x and r in continuous time has marginal distribution over x equal to p*.
“Lemma 6. The distribution has the following marginal distribution:where .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The structure of the CV-versus-average-ISI plot resembles data from recordings in behaving macaque monkeys, though at a lower average firing rate.
“The structure of this plot resembles, e.g., data from recordings in behaving macaque monkeys [68] (but note the lower average firing rate).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [68] W Softky, 1993, The highly irregular firing of cortical cells is inconsistent with temporal integration of random epsps., J Neurosci source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
For a given refractory function, there exists a unique function phi satisfying property (15).
“Lemma 4. Let be a tuple of non-negative real numbers, with and at least one element . This defines the refractory function via . There exists a unique function with the following property : (15)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The stationary distribution of the sampling process with relative refractory mechanism only provides an approximation to the target distribution.
“Therefore, the stationary distribution of the sampling process with relative refractory mechanism only provides an approximation to the target distribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 13
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 23
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe network model with alpha-shaped PSPs does not capture the target distribution as accurately as with theoretically ideal PSP shapes, but statistical dependencies between the RVs are still approximated reasonably well.
“Simulation results suggest that the network model with alpha-shaped PSPs does not capture the target distribution as accurately as with the theoretically ideal PSP shapes, statistical dependencies between the RVs are however still approximated reasonably well.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningTheorem 1: p is the unique invariant distribution of operator A, i.e., A is aperiodic and irreducible and satisfies (10).
“is the unique invariant distribution of operator , i.e., is aperiodic and irreducible and satisfies (10)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenEquation (11) cannot be solved analytically for in general.
“Unfortunately (11) cannot be solved analytically for in general.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFunctions that define a shorter refractory effect lead to higher firing rates and more irregular firing.
“This figure indicates, that functions that define a shorter refractory effect lead to higher firing rates and more irregular firing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe composition of these operators leaves the distribution invariant, which has interpretation as firing dynamics of the spiking neural network.
“In particular, the composition of these operators leaves invariant, which has a quite natural interpretation as firing dynamics of the spiking neural network : At each discrete time step the variables are updated for all neurons , where the update of takes preceding updates for with into account.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataComputer simulations suggest that globally the error introduced by the more complex neuron model is not functionally significant, i.e., statistical dependencies between RVs are still faithfully captured.
“Furthermore, our computer simulations suggest that also globally the error introduced by the more complex neuron model is not functionally significant, i.e. that statistical dependencies between the RVs are still faithfully captured.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAround a perceptual switch, the network remained in one mode of high probability for some period of time and then quickly traversed the state space to another mode.
“The black line marks a trace of network states around a perceptual switch: The network remained in one mode of high probability – corresponding to one percept – for some period of time, and then quickly traversed the state space to another mode – corresponding to a different percept.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The orientation of the population vector corresponds to the dominant orientation of the percept, and its distance from the origin encodes the strength of this percept.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataInterspike intervals larger than the refractory time constant roughly follow an exponential distribution.
“Interspike intervals larger than the refractory time constant roughly follow an exponential distribution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNeurons with similar preferred orientations featured excitatory synaptic connections, while those with dissimilar orientations maintained inhibitory synapses.
“As a result, neurons with similar preferred orientations featured excitatory synaptic connections ( = mean standard deviation of weight distribution), those with dissimilar orientations maintained inhibitory synapses ().”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The variables are observed with iid. uniformly in if and otherwise.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe measured preferred orientations were consistent with the preferred orientations used for stimulation.
“The measured values turned out to be consistent with the preferred orientations ( averaged over all neurons).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The variables are observed with iid. uniformly in if and otherwise.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataNetworks with additive, alpha-shaped PSPs account for dependencies between the random variables and yield a better approximation than fully factorized distributions.
“Still networks with this more realistic synapse model account for dependencies between the random variables and yield a better approximation of than fully factorized distributions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe average firing rate of the network was .
“The average firing rate of the network was .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenNeuronal biases converged to .
“Neuronal biases converged to .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The variables are observed with iid. uniformly in if and otherwise.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenFor Boltzmann distributions with small weights (), the random variables are nearly independent.
“For Boltzmann distributions with small weights (), the RVs are nearly independent”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe neurons exhibited a variety of average firing rates between and .
“The neurons exhibited a variety of average firing rates between and .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe responses of other neurons yield qualitatively similar statistics to the exemplar neuron.
“The responses of other neurons yield qualitatively similar statistics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe population vector typically reflected an arbitrary, yet coherent, orientation.
“As seen in panel (D), the population vector – a 2-dimensional projection of the high dimensional network state – typically reflected an arbitrary, yet coherent, orientation (for the definition of the population vector see below).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The variables are observed with iid. uniformly in if and otherwise.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe work provides a step towards closing the gap between abstract functional models of cortical computation and more detailed models of networks of spiking neurons.
“This provides a step towards closing the gap between abstract functional models of cortical computation and more detailed models of networks of spiking neurons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe proposed dynamics incorporate refractory effects and finite durations of postsynaptic potentials, and are therefore more biologically realistic than existing approaches.
“These dynamics incorporate refractory effects and finite durations of postsynaptic potentials (PSPs), and are therefore more biologically realistic than existing approaches.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNumerous studies in neuroscience and cognitive science have suggested that probabilistic inference could explain a variety of computational processes taking place in neural systems.
“Numerous studies in different areas of neuroscience and cognitive science have suggested that probabilistic inference could explain a variety of computational processes taking place in neural systems (see [10], [11]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] RPN Rao, 2002, Probabilistic Models of the Brain.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] K Doya, 2007, Bayesian Brain: Probabilistic Approaches to Neural Coding.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIt is difficult to relate the computational machinery required for probabilistic inference to experimental data on neurons, synapses, and neural systems.
“In spite of this active research on the functional level of neural processing, it turned out to be surprisingly hard to relate the computational machinery required for probabilistic inference to experimental data on neurons, synapses, and neural systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe Glauber dynamics arising from Gibbs/Metropolis-Hastings sampling are only superficially similar to spiking neural dynamics observed in experiments, rendering these models rather abstract.
“The dynamics that arise from this approach, the so-called Glauber dynamics, however are only superficially similar to spiking neural dynamics observed in experiments, rendering these models rather abstract.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIt is difficult to model an absolute refractory period or a PSP of fixed duration using a reversible Markov chain, but they are more conveniently modelled using an irreversible one.
“However, it is difficult to model some neural processes, such as an absolute refractory period or a postsynaptic potential (PSP) of fixed duration, using a reversible Markov chain, but they are more conveniently modelled using an irreversible one.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningDetailed balance implies invariance.
“A very useful property of (2) is that it implies the invariance property (1), and this is in fact the standard method for proving (1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningMany researchers have suggested that information processing in the brain carries out probabilistic, rather than logical, inference for making decisions and choosing actions.
“Therefore many researchers have suggested that information processing in the brain carries out probabilistic, rather than logical, inference for making decisions and choosing actions [9]–[22].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9]–[22]
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationA Markov chain that is irreducible and aperiodic converges to an invariant distribution independent of initial state.
“An important theorem from probability theory (see, e.g., p. 232 in [39]) states that if is irreducible (i.e., any state in can be reached from any other state in in finitely many steps with probability ) and aperiodic (i.e., its state transitions cannot be trapped in deterministic cycles), then the probability converges for to a probability that does not depend on the initial state .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] GR Grimmett, 2001, Probability and Random Processes. source
Not checked in the free run.
The quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe Markov chain provides samples from the given distribution p because by construction p is the marginal of the invariant distribution.
“As by construction , the Markov chain provides samples from the given distribution .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSeveral aspects of experimental data on perceptual multistability can be explained if one assumes that percepts correspond to samples from the conditional distribution over interpretations given the visual input.
“[16]–[18] propose that several aspects of experimental data on perceptual multistability can be explained if one assumes that percepts correspond to samples from the conditional distribution over interpretations (e.g., different 3D shapes) given the visual input (e.g., the 2D drawing).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16]–[18]
Not checked in the free run.
The quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe joint distribution over x and r has conditional distributions of the logistic form given in Lemma 1.
“Lemma 1. The distribution has conditional distributions of the following form:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe MCMC interpretation is able to qualitatively reproduce the experimentally observed distribution of dominance durations.
“In [18] it is shown that this MCMC interpretation is also able to qualitatively reproduce the experimentally observed distribution of dominance durations, i.e., the distribution of time intervals between perceptual switches.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] SJ Gershman, 2009, Perceptual multistability as Markov chain Monte Carlo inference.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenDiscretizing the continuous-time model yields the discrete-time model defined earlier.
“It can be shown that discretizing this continuous time model yields the discrete time model defined earlier, which thus can be regarded as a version suitable for simulations on a digital computer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe presented spiking neural network samples from a given probability distribution via its inherent network dynamics and is able to carry out probabilistic inference through sampling.
“We have presented a spiking neural network that samples from a given probability distribution via its inherent network dynamics. In particular the network is able to carry out probabilistic inference through sampling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe continuous-time neural network samples from the desired distribution; the desired distribution is an invariant distribution of the network dynamics.
“In analogy to the discrete time case, the neural network in continuous time can be shown to sample from the desired distribution , i.e., is an invariant distribution of the network dynamics defined above.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe ISI histogram reflects the reduced spiking probability immediately after an action potential due to the refractory mechanism.
“The ISI histogram reflects the reduced spiking probability immediately after an action potential due the refractory mechanism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSimilar ISI distributions were observed during in-vivo recordings in awake, behaving monkeys.
“Similar ISI distributions were observed during in-vivo recordings in awake, behaving monkeys [67].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [67] S Shinomoto, 2009, Relating neuronal firing patterns to functional differentiation of cerebral cortex., PLoS Comput Biol source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFor all i, the unique invariant distribution of operator T_i^rel fulfills p*(x_i|...); for a constant configuration, the operator produces samples from the correct conditional distribution.
“Lemma 5. For all the unique invariant distribution of the operator fulfills . This means, for a constant configuration , the operator produces samples from the correct conditional distribution .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe bell-shaped distribution of the membrane potential is commonly observed in neurons embedded in an active network.
“The bell-shaped distribution of the membrane potential is commonly observed in neurons embedded in an active network [66].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [66] M Pospischil, 2009, Characterizing neuronal activity by describing the membrane potential as a stochastic process., J Physiol Paris source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe theory of the neuron model with absolute refractory mechanism guarantees sampling from the correct distribution.
“The theory of the neuron model with absolute refractory mechanism guarantees sampling form the correct distribution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
The membrane potential of a neuron at time t equals the log-odds of the corresponding binary variable being active (the neural computability condition).
“we assume that the membrane potential of neuron at time equals the log-odds of the corresponding variable to be active, and refer to this property as neural computability condition:(4)”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Preprocessing elements compute nonlinear combinations of presynaptic activities.
“This preprocessing might be implemented by dendrites or other (inter-) neurons and is assumed to compute nonlinear combinations of the presynaptic activities (similar to a kernel).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The discrete-time model uses a well-regulated updating policy (sequential updates in the same order).
“The assumption of a well-regulated updating policy will be overcome in the continuous-time limit, i.e., in case where the neural dynamics are described as a Markov jump process.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The time course of the postsynaptic potential in a neuron caused by a firing of another neuron is approximated by a constant signal of duration (a square pulse).
“and approximates the time course of the postsynaptic potential in neuron caused by a firing of neuron with a constant signal of duration (i.e., a square pulse).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The proposed network models are based on rectangular-shaped, renewal PSPs.
“The proposed network models are based on the assumption of rectangular-shaped, renewal PSPs.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Renewal PSPs evoked by a single synapse do not add up but are merely prolonged in duration; renewal PSPs elicited at different synapses add up in the normal way.
“Renewal PSPs evoked by a single synapse do not add up but are merely prolonged in their duration (according to equation (6)); renewal PSPs elicited at different synapses nevertheless add up in the normal way.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The neurons in the network represent neurons in the visual system that have roughly the same or neighboring receptive field, and each neuron receives visual input from either the left or the right eye.
“We assume that these neurons represent neurons in the visual system that have roughly the same or neighboring receptive field, and that each neuron receives visual input from either the left or the right eye.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The orientation of the population vector corresponds to the dominant orientation of the percept, and its distance from the origin encodes the strength of this percept.
“The orientation of the population vector is assumed to correspond to the dominant orientation of the percept, and its distance from the origin encodes the strength of this percept.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The neural processes are simplified with simple symbolic postsynaptic potentials in the form of step-functions.
“We have made various simplifying assumption regarding neural processes, e.g., simple symbolic postsynaptic potentials in the form of step-functions (reminiscent of plateau potentials caused by dendritic NMDA spikes [61]).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
For all x, p(x)>0, which is required for irreducibility and uniqueness of the invariant distribution of the MCMC dynamics.
“The assumption for all is required to show the irreducibility of the Markov chain, a prerequisite to ensure the uniqueness of the invariant distribution of the MCMC dynamics.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The state space of is for .
“As already assumed in the case of the absolute refractory sampler in continuous time, we define the state space of to be for .”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The variables are observed with iid. uniformly in if and otherwise.
“The variables were also assumed to be observed with iid. uniformly in if and otherwise.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Approximate inference algorithms such as sampling may explain cortical feedback signals and activity correlations.
“As theories of brain computation, approximate inference algorithms such as sampling may explain cortical feedback signals and activity correlations97,108–110.”
From Cognitive computational neuroscience (2018) · cites this paper as [108]
The sampling viewpoint fits with current thinking in computational neuroscience, where an influential proposal is that transitions between brain states correspond to sampling from a probability distribution or multiple samples are represented simultaneously.
“The sampling viewpoint also fits with current thinking in computational neuroscience, where an influential proposal is that transitions between brain states correspond to sampling from a probability distribution [26,27,81,82] or multiple samples are represented simultaneously (e.g., using particle filters [83][84][85][86]).”
From Bayesian Brains without Probabilities (2016) · cites this paper as [82]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Discussion cites nonexistent Figure 5 panels
MinorThe discussion refers to panels D and E of Figure 5, but the Figure 5 caption describes only panels A, B, and C. Panels D and E belong to Figure 4.
“see the difference between panels D and E of Figure 5”
“Figure: Figure 5 Firing statistics of neural sampling networks. (A) Shown is the membrane potential histogram of a typical neuron during sampling. The data is that of neuron from the simulation shown in Figure 3 (the membrane potential and spike trace of are highlighted in Figure 3). (B) The plot shows the ISI distribution of a typical neuron (again from Figure 3) during sampling.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 86 · Cited by 384
- Authors
- Buesing, L., Bill, J., Nessler, B., & Maass, W.
- Affiliations
- Graz University of Technology (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Buesing, Lars
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2011-11-03
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e1002211
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- PMC
- PMC3207943
- OpenAlex
- W2051137788
- Semantic Scholar
- e4e100e44bf7618c7d96188605fd9870012bdb50
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 9.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission (269921, 237955, 243914, 506778, 216593)
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-CHRI-0002)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
- Keywords
- spiking neural networks, recurrent neural networks, stochastic computing, probabilistic inference, Markov chain Monte Carlo, non-reversible Markov chains, trial-to-trial variability, neural dynamics, cortical computation, Gibbs sampling
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Algorithms, Animals, Computer Simulation, Humans, Markov Chains, Models, Neurological, Monte Carlo Method, Neurons, Primates, Stochastic Processes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review