Cited by 384Neural dynamics and brain functionNeural Networks and Applicationsstochastic dynamics and bifurcation

Neural dynamics as sampling: a model for stochastic computation in recurrent networks of spiking neurons

Open access
Buesing, Lars, Bill, Johannes, Nessler, Bernhard, Maass, Wolfgang·2011·PLoS Computational Biology

Abstract

The organization of computations in networks of spiking neurons in the brain is still largely unknown, in particular in view of the inherently stochastic features of their firing activity and the experimentally observed trial-to-trial variability of neural systems in the brain. In principle there exists a powerful computational framework for stochastic computations, probabilistic inference by sampling, which can explain a large number of macroscopic experimental data in neuroscience and cognitive science. But it has turned out to be surprisingly difficult to create a link between these abstract models for stochastic computations and more detailed models of the dynamics of networks of spiking neurons. Here we create such a link and show that under some conditions the stochastic firing activity of networks of spiking neurons can be interpreted as probabilistic inference via Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling. Since common methods for MCMC sampling in distributed systems, such as Gibbs sampling, are inconsistent with the dynamics of spiking neurons, we introduce a different approach based on non-reversible Markov chains that is able to reflect inherent temporal processes of spiking neuronal activity through a suitable choice of random variables. We propose a neural network model and show by a rigorous theoretical analysis that its neural activity implements MCMC sampling of a given distribution, both for the case of discrete and continuous time. This provides a step towards closing the gap between abstract functional models of cortical computation and more detailed models of networks of spiking neurons.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper shows that stochastic firing in recurrent networks of spiking neurons can implement probabilistic inference via Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling, including discrete- and continuous-time formulations. It introduces non-reversible MCMC dynamics to accommodate finite-duration PSPs and refractory mechanisms, and demonstrates the approach in simulations including a model of perceptual multistability.

Key findings

  • Under a neural computability condition—where a neuron’s membrane potential equals the log-odds of its binary variable being active—the network’s stochastic spiking dynamics can sample from a given distribution; for the absolute-refractory discrete-time model, Theorem 1 proves the joint distribution is the unique invariant distribution of the transition operator.
  • The model uses irreversible Markov chains, unlike Gibbs sampling, to incorporate finite-duration postsynaptic potentials and refractory effects; a continuous-time version is also shown to sample from the correct distribution.
  • For the relative-refractory model, only “local” correctness is proven, but simulations with K=10 variables and 100 randomly generated Boltzmann distributions indicate the approximation error is orders of magnitude below a fully factorized distribution when statistical dependencies are present.
  • In a perceptual multistability simulation with 217 neurons, clamping 8 of 217 neurons produced a bimodal posterior distribution; dominance durations were approximated by a Gamma distribution, and the spike response was sparse, asynchronous, and irregular.

Methods

  • Theoretical analysis: binary random variables are represented by spikes lasting a fixed duration τ, with auxiliary variables tracking spike timing; transition operators are defined and analyzed via Lemmata 1–10, with Boltzmann distributions used as a concrete distribution class.
  • Simulations: networks of 3, 40, and 217 neurons sampled from Boltzmann distributions; the first 1 s of simulated time was discarded as burn-in; neural sampling was compared to Gibbs sampling, and approximation quality was measured by Kullback-Leibler divergence, including tests with relative refractory mechanisms and alpha-shaped additive PSPs.
  • Multistability model: 217 orientation-selective neurons on a hexagonal grid were trained as a fully visible Boltzmann machine using contrastive divergence; ambiguous input was applied by clamping 8 of 217 neurons, and population-vector decoding was used to visualize network states and measure dominance durations.

Limitations

  • Stated: the relative-refractory model is only proven to be “locally correct,” and the paper cannot prove in general that the global network samples from the target distribution; simulations suggest the error is small. The continuous-time relative-refractory version has the same limitation.
  • Stated: replacing theoretically ideal rectangular, renewal PSPs with more realistic alpha-shaped, additive PSPs yields a clearly higher Kullback-Leibler divergence to the true distribution, though it still captures dependencies better than a fully factorized approximation.
  • Stated: the input model via clamping is simplistic, zero-contrast stimuli require more modeling, and the work makes simplifying assumptions about neural processes such as step-function PSPs; integrating multiple biological time constants remains an open problem. The discrete-time model also assumes a fixed sequential update order, described as a severe restriction that is overcome in continuous time.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002211

Cites

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 17 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    The proposed neural network model implements MCMC sampling of a given distribution in a spiking neural network, both for discrete and continuous time.

    “We propose a neural network model and show by a rigorous theoretical analysis that its neural activity implements MCMC sampling of a given distribution, both for the case of discrete and continuous time.”
    • Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
      “Formally speaking, our model implements Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling in a spiking neural network.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    The proposed family of network models can be shown to exactly sample from any arbitrary member of a well-defined class of probability distributions via their inherent network dynamics.

    “we propose here a family of network models, that can be shown to exactly sample from any arbitrary member of a well-defined class of probability distributions via their inherent network dynamics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    If a subset of variables are observed (clamped), the remaining network samples from the conditional distribution of the remaining variables given the observables.

    “If a subset of the variables are observed, modelled as the corresponding neurons being “clamped” to the observed values, the remaining network samples from the conditional distribution of the remaining variables given the observables.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    Each stochastic state transition operator leaves the given distribution invariant.

    “It can be shown that each of these stochastic state transition operators leaves the given distribution invariant, i.e., satisfies equation (1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    In contrast to prior approaches, the model incorporates irreversible dynamics (i.e., no detailed balance) allowing for finite time PSPs and refractory mechanisms.

    “In contrast to prior approaches however, our model incorporates irreversible dynamics (i.e., no detailed balance) allowing for finite time PSPs and refractory mechanisms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 13
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 23
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The network model with alpha-shaped PSPs does not capture the target distribution as accurately as with theoretically ideal PSP shapes, but statistical dependencies between the RVs are still approximated reasonably well.

    “Simulation results suggest that the network model with alpha-shaped PSPs does not capture the target distribution as accurately as with the theoretically ideal PSP shapes, statistical dependencies between the RVs are however still approximated reasonably well.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Theorem 1: p is the unique invariant distribution of operator A, i.e., A is aperiodic and irreducible and satisfies (10).

    “is the unique invariant distribution of operator , i.e., is aperiodic and irreducible and satisfies (10)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Equation (11) cannot be solved analytically for in general.

    “Unfortunately (11) cannot be solved analytically for in general.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Functions that define a shorter refractory effect lead to higher firing rates and more irregular firing.

    “This figure indicates, that functions that define a shorter refractory effect lead to higher firing rates and more irregular firing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The composition of these operators leaves the distribution invariant, which has interpretation as firing dynamics of the spiking neural network.

    “In particular, the composition of these operators leaves invariant, which has a quite natural interpretation as firing dynamics of the spiking neural network : At each discrete time step the variables are updated for all neurons , where the update of takes preceding updates for with into account.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Computer simulations suggest that globally the error introduced by the more complex neuron model is not functionally significant, i.e., statistical dependencies between RVs are still faithfully captured.

    “Furthermore, our computer simulations suggest that also globally the error introduced by the more complex neuron model is not functionally significant, i.e. that statistical dependencies between the RVs are still faithfully captured.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Around a perceptual switch, the network remained in one mode of high probability for some period of time and then quickly traversed the state space to another mode.

    “The black line marks a trace of network states around a perceptual switch: The network remained in one mode of high probability – corresponding to one percept – for some period of time, and then quickly traversed the state space to another mode – corresponding to a different percept.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The orientation of the population vector corresponds to the dominant orientation of the percept, and its distance from the origin encodes the strength of this percept.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Interspike intervals larger than the refractory time constant roughly follow an exponential distribution.

    “Interspike intervals larger than the refractory time constant roughly follow an exponential distribution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Neurons with similar preferred orientations featured excitatory synaptic connections, while those with dissimilar orientations maintained inhibitory synapses.

    “As a result, neurons with similar preferred orientations featured excitatory synaptic connections ( = mean standard deviation of weight distribution), those with dissimilar orientations maintained inhibitory synapses ().”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The variables are observed with iid. uniformly in if and otherwise.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The measured preferred orientations were consistent with the preferred orientations used for stimulation.

    “The measured values turned out to be consistent with the preferred orientations ( averaged over all neurons).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The variables are observed with iid. uniformly in if and otherwise.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Networks with additive, alpha-shaped PSPs account for dependencies between the random variables and yield a better approximation than fully factorized distributions.

    “Still networks with this more realistic synapse model account for dependencies between the random variables and yield a better approximation of than fully factorized distributions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    The average firing rate of the network was .

    “The average firing rate of the network was .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Neuronal biases converged to .

    “Neuronal biases converged to .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The variables are observed with iid. uniformly in if and otherwise.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    For Boltzmann distributions with small weights (), the random variables are nearly independent.

    “For Boltzmann distributions with small weights (), the RVs are nearly independent”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The neurons exhibited a variety of average firing rates between and .

    “The neurons exhibited a variety of average firing rates between and .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The responses of other neurons yield qualitatively similar statistics to the exemplar neuron.

    “The responses of other neurons yield qualitatively similar statistics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The population vector typically reflected an arbitrary, yet coherent, orientation.

    “As seen in panel (D), the population vector – a 2-dimensional projection of the high dimensional network state – typically reflected an arbitrary, yet coherent, orientation (for the definition of the population vector see below).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The variables are observed with iid. uniformly in if and otherwise.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The work provides a step towards closing the gap between abstract functional models of cortical computation and more detailed models of networks of spiking neurons.

    “This provides a step towards closing the gap between abstract functional models of cortical computation and more detailed models of networks of spiking neurons.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The proposed dynamics incorporate refractory effects and finite durations of postsynaptic potentials, and are therefore more biologically realistic than existing approaches.

    “These dynamics incorporate refractory effects and finite durations of postsynaptic potentials (PSPs), and are therefore more biologically realistic than existing approaches.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Numerous studies in neuroscience and cognitive science have suggested that probabilistic inference could explain a variety of computational processes taking place in neural systems.

    “Numerous studies in different areas of neuroscience and cognitive science have suggested that probabilistic inference could explain a variety of computational processes taking place in neural systems (see [10], [11]).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [10] RPN Rao, 2002, Probabilistic Models of the Brain.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [11] K Doya, 2007, Bayesian Brain: Probabilistic Approaches to Neural Coding.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    It is difficult to relate the computational machinery required for probabilistic inference to experimental data on neurons, synapses, and neural systems.

    “In spite of this active research on the functional level of neural processing, it turned out to be surprisingly hard to relate the computational machinery required for probabilistic inference to experimental data on neurons, synapses, and neural systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The Glauber dynamics arising from Gibbs/Metropolis-Hastings sampling are only superficially similar to spiking neural dynamics observed in experiments, rendering these models rather abstract.

    “The dynamics that arise from this approach, the so-called Glauber dynamics, however are only superficially similar to spiking neural dynamics observed in experiments, rendering these models rather abstract.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    It is difficult to model an absolute refractory period or a PSP of fixed duration using a reversible Markov chain, but they are more conveniently modelled using an irreversible one.

    “However, it is difficult to model some neural processes, such as an absolute refractory period or a postsynaptic potential (PSP) of fixed duration, using a reversible Markov chain, but they are more conveniently modelled using an irreversible one.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Detailed balance implies invariance.

    “A very useful property of (2) is that it implies the invariance property (1), and this is in fact the standard method for proving (1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    Many researchers have suggested that information processing in the brain carries out probabilistic, rather than logical, inference for making decisions and choosing actions.

    “Therefore many researchers have suggested that information processing in the brain carries out probabilistic, rather than logical, inference for making decisions and choosing actions [9]–[22].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9]–[22]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    A Markov chain that is irreducible and aperiodic converges to an invariant distribution independent of initial state.

    “An important theorem from probability theory (see, e.g., p. 232 in [39]) states that if is irreducible (i.e., any state in can be reached from any other state in in finitely many steps with probability ) and aperiodic (i.e., its state transitions cannot be trapped in deterministic cycles), then the probability converges for to a probability that does not depend on the initial state .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] GR Grimmett, 2001, Probability and Random Processes. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The Markov chain provides samples from the given distribution p because by construction p is the marginal of the invariant distribution.

    “As by construction , the Markov chain provides samples from the given distribution .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Several aspects of experimental data on perceptual multistability can be explained if one assumes that percepts correspond to samples from the conditional distribution over interpretations given the visual input.

    “[16]–[18] propose that several aspects of experimental data on perceptual multistability can be explained if one assumes that percepts correspond to samples from the conditional distribution over interpretations (e.g., different 3D shapes) given the visual input (e.g., the 2D drawing).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16]–[18]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The joint distribution over x and r has conditional distributions of the logistic form given in Lemma 1.

    “Lemma 1. The distribution has conditional distributions of the following form:”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The MCMC interpretation is able to qualitatively reproduce the experimentally observed distribution of dominance durations.

    “In [18] it is shown that this MCMC interpretation is also able to qualitatively reproduce the experimentally observed distribution of dominance durations, i.e., the distribution of time intervals between perceptual switches.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] SJ Gershman, 2009, Perceptual multistability as Markov chain Monte Carlo inference.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Discretizing the continuous-time model yields the discrete-time model defined earlier.

    “It can be shown that discretizing this continuous time model yields the discrete time model defined earlier, which thus can be regarded as a version suitable for simulations on a digital computer.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The presented spiking neural network samples from a given probability distribution via its inherent network dynamics and is able to carry out probabilistic inference through sampling.

    “We have presented a spiking neural network that samples from a given probability distribution via its inherent network dynamics. In particular the network is able to carry out probabilistic inference through sampling.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The continuous-time neural network samples from the desired distribution; the desired distribution is an invariant distribution of the network dynamics.

    “In analogy to the discrete time case, the neural network in continuous time can be shown to sample from the desired distribution , i.e., is an invariant distribution of the network dynamics defined above.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The ISI histogram reflects the reduced spiking probability immediately after an action potential due to the refractory mechanism.

    “The ISI histogram reflects the reduced spiking probability immediately after an action potential due the refractory mechanism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Similar ISI distributions were observed during in-vivo recordings in awake, behaving monkeys.

    “Similar ISI distributions were observed during in-vivo recordings in awake, behaving monkeys [67].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [67] S Shinomoto, 2009, Relating neuronal firing patterns to functional differentiation of cerebral cortex., PLoS Comput Biol source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    For all i, the unique invariant distribution of operator T_i^rel fulfills p*(x_i|...); for a constant configuration, the operator produces samples from the correct conditional distribution.

    “Lemma 5. For all the unique invariant distribution of the operator fulfills . This means, for a constant configuration , the operator produces samples from the correct conditional distribution .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The bell-shaped distribution of the membrane potential is commonly observed in neurons embedded in an active network.

    “The bell-shaped distribution of the membrane potential is commonly observed in neurons embedded in an active network [66].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [66] M Pospischil, 2009, Characterizing neuronal activity by describing the membrane potential as a stochastic process., J Physiol Paris source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The theory of the neuron model with absolute refractory mechanism guarantees sampling from the correct distribution.

    “The theory of the neuron model with absolute refractory mechanism guarantees sampling form the correct distribution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
38 of 38
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The membrane potential of a neuron at time t equals the log-odds of the corresponding binary variable being active (the neural computability condition).

    “we assume that the membrane potential of neuron at time equals the log-odds of the corresponding variable to be active, and refer to this property as neural computability condition:(4)”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Preprocessing elements compute nonlinear combinations of presynaptic activities.

    “This preprocessing might be implemented by dendrites or other (inter-) neurons and is assumed to compute nonlinear combinations of the presynaptic activities (similar to a kernel).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The discrete-time model uses a well-regulated updating policy (sequential updates in the same order).

    “The assumption of a well-regulated updating policy will be overcome in the continuous-time limit, i.e., in case where the neural dynamics are described as a Markov jump process.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The time course of the postsynaptic potential in a neuron caused by a firing of another neuron is approximated by a constant signal of duration (a square pulse).

    “and approximates the time course of the postsynaptic potential in neuron caused by a firing of neuron with a constant signal of duration (i.e., a square pulse).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The proposed network models are based on rectangular-shaped, renewal PSPs.

    “The proposed network models are based on the assumption of rectangular-shaped, renewal PSPs.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Renewal PSPs evoked by a single synapse do not add up but are merely prolonged in duration; renewal PSPs elicited at different synapses add up in the normal way.

    “Renewal PSPs evoked by a single synapse do not add up but are merely prolonged in their duration (according to equation (6)); renewal PSPs elicited at different synapses nevertheless add up in the normal way.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The neurons in the network represent neurons in the visual system that have roughly the same or neighboring receptive field, and each neuron receives visual input from either the left or the right eye.

    “We assume that these neurons represent neurons in the visual system that have roughly the same or neighboring receptive field, and that each neuron receives visual input from either the left or the right eye.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The orientation of the population vector corresponds to the dominant orientation of the percept, and its distance from the origin encodes the strength of this percept.

    “The orientation of the population vector is assumed to correspond to the dominant orientation of the percept, and its distance from the origin encodes the strength of this percept.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The neural processes are simplified with simple symbolic postsynaptic potentials in the form of step-functions.

    “We have made various simplifying assumption regarding neural processes, e.g., simple symbolic postsynaptic potentials in the form of step-functions (reminiscent of plateau potentials caused by dendritic NMDA spikes [61]).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    For all x, p(x)>0, which is required for irreducibility and uniqueness of the invariant distribution of the MCMC dynamics.

    “The assumption for all is required to show the irreducibility of the Markov chain, a prerequisite to ensure the uniqueness of the invariant distribution of the MCMC dynamics.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The state space of is for .

    “As already assumed in the case of the absolute refractory sampler in continuous time, we define the state space of to be for .”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The variables are observed with iid. uniformly in if and otherwise.

    “The variables were also assumed to be observed with iid. uniformly in if and otherwise.”
12 of 12

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Approximate inference algorithms such as sampling may explain cortical feedback signals and activity correlations.

    “As theories of brain computation, approximate inference algorithms such as sampling may explain cortical feedback signals and activity correlations97,108–110.”

    From Cognitive computational neuroscience (2018) · cites this paper as [108]

  • The sampling viewpoint fits with current thinking in computational neuroscience, where an influential proposal is that transitions between brain states correspond to sampling from a probability distribution or multiple samples are represented simultaneously.

    “The sampling viewpoint also fits with current thinking in computational neuroscience, where an influential proposal is that transitions between brain states correspond to sampling from a probability distribution [26,27,81,82] or multiple samples are represented simultaneously (e.g., using particle filters [83][84][85][86]).”

    From Bayesian Brains without Probabilities (2016) · cites this paper as [82]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Discussion cites nonexistent Figure 5 panels

    Minor

    The discussion refers to panels D and E of Figure 5, but the Figure 5 caption describes only panels A, B, and C. Panels D and E belong to Figure 4.

1 of 1

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 86 · Cited by 384

Authors
Buesing, L., Bill, J., Nessler, B., & Maass, W.
Affiliations
Graz University of Technology (AT)
Corresponding author
Buesing, Lars
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2011-11-03
Volume
7
Issue
11
Pages
e1002211
ISSN
  • 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7358
OpenAlex
W2051137788
Cited by
384
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
FWCI
9.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (269921, 237955, 243914, 506778, 216593)
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-CHRI-0002)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
Keywords
spiking neural networks, recurrent neural networks, stochastic computing, probabilistic inference, Markov chain Monte Carlo, non-reversible Markov chains, trial-to-trial variability, neural dynamics, cortical computation, Gibbs sampling
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Algorithms, Animals, Computer Simulation, Humans, Markov Chains, Models, Neurological, Monte Carlo Method, Neurons, Primates, Stochastic Processes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review