Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 827

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prospects for reducing the processing cost of lithium ion batteries

Open access
Wood, David L., Li, Jianlin, Daniel, Claus·2015·Journal of Power Sources

Abstract

A detailed processing cost breakdown is given for lithium-ion battery (LIB) electrodes, which focuses on: 1) elimination of toxic, costly N -methylpyrrolidone (NMP) dispersion chemistry; 2) doubling the thicknesses of the anode and cathode to raise energy density; and 3) reduction of the anode electrolyte wetting and SEI-layer formation time. These processing cost reduction technologies generically adaptable to any anode or cathode cell chemistry and are being implemented at ORNL. This paper shows step by step how these cost savings can be realized in existing or new LIB manufacturing plants using a baseline case of thin (power) electrodes produced with NMP processing and a standard 10–14-day wetting and formation process. In particular, it is shown that aqueous electrode processing can cut the electrode processing cost and energy consumption by an order of magnitude. Doubling the thickness of the electrodes allows for using half of the inactive current collectors and separators, contributing even further to the processing cost savings. Finally wetting and SEI-layer formation cost savings are discussed in the context of a protocol with significantly reduced time. These three benefits collectively offer the possibility of reducing LIB pack cost from $502.8 kW h −1 -usable to $370.3 kW h −1 -usable, a savings of $132.5/kWh (or 26.4%). • A comprehensive cost study on lithium-ion electrode processing is reported. • Advanced electrode processing can save up to $111/kWh-usable. • Reduced SEI-layer formation time can save an additional $22/kWh-usable. • These processing technologies are amenable to any anode or cathode chemistry. • Capital cost savings realized and cell processing bottlenecks addressed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.019

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 827

Metadata

Authors
Wood, D. L., Li, J., & Daniel, C.
Venue
Journal of Power Sources
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
275
Pages
234-242
ISSN
0378-7753 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052909548
Cited by
827
References
3
FWCI
20.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospects for reducing the processing cost of lithium ion batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.019
The paper
Wood, D. L., Li, J., & Daniel, C. (2015). Prospects for reducing the processing cost of lithium ion batteries. Journal of Power Sources. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.019

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.