CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 30Fuel Cells and Related MaterialsAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsMembrane-based Ion Separation Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

4D imaging of chemo-mechanical membrane degradation in polymer electrolyte fuel cells - Part 1: Understanding and evading edge failures

Chen, Yixuan, Singh, Yadvinder, Ramani, Dilip, Orfino, Francesco P., Dutta, Monica, Kjeang, Erik·2022·Journal of Power Sources
DOI 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230674
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230674

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Alavijeh, 2015, Decay in mechanical properties of catalyst coated membranes subjected to combined chemical and mechanical membrane degradation, Fuel Cells, 15, 204, 10.1002/fuce.201400040 · DOI
  2. Zhang, 2009, A review of platinum-based catalyst layer degradation in proton exchange membrane fuel cells, J. Power Sources, 194, 588, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.06.073 · DOI
  3. Park, 2015, A review of the gas diffusion layer in proton exchange membrane fuel cells: durability and degradation, Applied Energy, 155, 866, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.06.068 · DOI
  4. Wu, 2008, A review of PEM fuel cell durability: degradation mechanisms and mitigation strategies, J. Power Sources, 184, 104, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.006 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Danilczuk, 2009, Visualizing chemical reactions and crossover processes in a fuel cell inserted in the ESR resonator: detection by spin trapping of oxygen radicals, nafion-derived fragments, and hydrogen and deuterium atoms, J. Physical Chem B, 113, 8031, 10.1021/jp901597f · DOI
  6. Ghassemzadeh, 2013, Selective formation of hydrogen and hydroxyl radicals by electron beam irradiation and their reactivity with perfluorosulfonated acid ionomer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 135, 15923, 10.1021/ja408032p · DOI
  7. Healy, 2005, Aspects of the chemical degradation of PFSA ionomers used in PEM fuel cells, Fuel Cells, 5, 302, 10.1002/fuce.200400050 · DOI
  8. Coms, 2008, The chemistry of fuel cell membrane chemical degradation, ECS Trans, 16, 235, 10.1149/1.2981859 · DOI
  9. Kundu, 2010, Open circuit voltage durability study and model of catalyst coated membranes at different humidification levels, J. Power Sources, 195, 7323, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.05.027 · DOI
  10. Singh, 2017, 3D failure analysis of pure mechanical and pure chemical degradation in fuel cell membranes, J. Electrochem. Soc., 164, F1331, 10.1149/2.0451713jes · DOI
  11. Lim, 2014, Membrane degradation during combined chemical and mechanical accelerated stress testing of polymer electrolyte fuel cells, J. Power Sources, 257, 102, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.106 · DOI
  12. Macauley, 2015, Accelerated membrane durability testing of heavy duty fuel cells, J. Electrochem. Soc., 162, F98, 10.1149/2.0671501jes · DOI
  13. Zawodzinski, 1993, A comparative study of water uptake by and transport through ionomeric fuel cell membranes, J. Electrochem. Soc., 140, 1981, 10.1149/1.2220749 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Operating Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells without External Humidification of the Reactant Gases, (n.d.). http://jes.ecsdl.org/content/144/8/2767 (accessed September 7, 2019). · DOI
  15. Tang, 2007, A degradation study of Nafion proton exchange membrane of PEM fuel cells, J. Power Sources, 170, 85, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.03.061 · DOI
  16. Sadeghi Alavijeh, 2015, Creep properties of catalyst coated membranes for polymer electrolyte fuel cells, J. Power Sources, 285, 16, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.082 · DOI
  17. Patil, 2010, Deterioration of mechanical properties: a cause for fuel cell membrane failure, J. Membrane Science, 356, 7, 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.02.060 · DOI
  18. Ramani, 2021, Mitigation of mechanical membrane degradation in fuel cells – Part 1: gas diffusion layers with low surface roughness, J. Power Sources
  19. Ramani, 2021, Mitigation of mechanical membrane degradation in fuel cells – Part 2: bonded membrane electrode assembly, Journal of Power Sources, 512
  20. Kreitmeier, 2013, Local degradation at membrane defects in polymer electrolyte fuel cells, J. Electrochem. Soc., 160, F456, 10.1149/1.023306jes · DOI
  21. Garland, 2007, DOE fuel cell program: durability technical targets and testing protocols, ECS Trans, 11, 923, 10.1149/1.2781004 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Mukundan, 2018, Membrane accelerated stress test development for polymer electrolyte fuel cell durability validated using field and drive cycle testing, J. Electrochem. Soc., 165, F3085, 10.1149/2.0101806jes · DOI
  23. Saha, 2010, Fabrication of catalyst-coated membrane by modified decal transfer technique, Electrochemistry Communications, 12, 410, 10.1016/j.elecom.2010.01.006 · DOI
  24. Wang, 2011, A review of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: technology, applications, and needs on fundamental research, Applied Energy, 88, 981, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.09.030 · DOI
  25. Ye, 2013, A review on the sealing structures of membrane electrode assembly of proton exchange membrane fuel cells, J. Power Sources, 231, 285, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.009 · DOI
  26. Stahl, 2015, Water distribution analysis in the outer perimeter region of technical PEFC based on neutron radiography, J. Electrochem. Soc., 162, F677, 10.1149/2.0351507jes · DOI
  27. Sompalli, 2007, Membrane degradation at catalyst layer edges in PEMFC MEAs, J. Electrochem. Soc., 154, B1349, 10.1149/1.2789791 · DOI
  28. Chen, 2020, Effects of cycle duration and test hardware in relative humidity cycling of a polymer electrolyte membrane, J. Power Sources, 476, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228576 · DOI
  29. Huang, 2006, Mechanical endurance of polymer electrolyte membrane and PEM fuel cell durability, Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, 44, 2346, 10.1002/polb.20863 · DOI
  30. Shi, 2020, Fatigue crack propagation behavior of fuel cell membranes after chemical degradation, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 45, 27653, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.113 · DOI
  31. Kundu, 2006, Morphological features (defects) in fuel cell membrane electrode assemblies, J. Power Sources, 157, 650, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.12.027 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Wang, 2021, Visualization, understanding, and mitigation of process-induced-membrane irregularities in gas diffusion electrode-based polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 46, 14699, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.186 · DOI
  33. Singh, 2017, 3D visualization of membrane failures in fuel cells, Journal of Power Sources, 345, 1, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.129 · DOI
  34. Ramani, 2018, Characterization of membrane degradation growth in fuel cells using X-ray computed tomography, J. Electrochem. Soc., 165, F3200, 10.1149/2.0251806jes · DOI
  35. Hack, 2020, Use of X-ray computed tomography for understanding localised, along-the-channel degradation of polymer electrolyte fuel cells, Electrochimica Acta, 352, 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136464 · DOI
  36. Singh, 2019, Tracking the evolution of mechanical degradation in fuel cell membranes using 4D in situ visualization, J. Power Sources, 412, 224, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.11.049 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Ramani, 2021, Four-dimensional in situ imaging of chemical membrane degradation in fuel cells, Electrochimica Acta, 380, 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138194 · DOI
  38. Stoll, 2021, Four-Dimensional identical-location X-ray imaging of fuel cell degradation during start-up/shut-down cycling, J. Electrochem. Soc., 168, 10.1149/1945-7111/abe56b · DOI
  39. White, 2016, 3D printed flow field and fixture for visualization of water distribution in fuel cells by X-ray computed tomography, J. Electrochem. Soc., 163, F1337, 10.1149/2.0461613jes · DOI
  40. White, 2019, Four-dimensional joint visualization of electrode degradation and liquid water distribution inside operating polymer electrolyte fuel cells, Sci Rep, 9, 1, 10.1038/s41598-018-38464-9 · DOI
  41. White, 2016, Communication—effect of micro-XCT X-ray exposure on the performance of polymer electrolyte fuel cells, J. Electrochem. Soc., 163, F1206, 10.1149/2.0751610jes · DOI
  42. Hizir, 2010, Characterization of interfacial morphology in polymer electrolyte fuel cells: micro-porous layer and catalyst layer surfaces, J. Power Sources, 195, 3463, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.032 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chen, Y., Singh, Y., Ramani, D., Orfino, F. P., Dutta, M., & Kjeang, E.
Affiliations
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • Ballard Power Systems (Canada) (CA)
Corresponding author
Kjeang, Erik
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Power Sources
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
520
Pages
230674
ISSN
0378-7753 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230674
OpenAlex
W3208361923
Cited by
30
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Journal of Power Sources (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canada Research Chairs
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Simon Fraser University
  • Western Economic Diversification Canada
  • British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund
  • Ballard Power Systems
  • Canada Foundation for Innovation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
Keywords
proton exchange membrane fuel cells, membrane degradation, chemo-mechanical degradation, edge failure, computed tomography, accelerated stress testing, load distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review