The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in proteomics: Past, present and future
Open accessAbstract
Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis has been instrumental in the birth and developments of proteomics, although it is no longer the exclusive separation tool used in the field of proteomics. In this review, a historical perspective is made, starting from the days where two-dimensional gels were used and the word proteomics did not even exist. The events that have led to the birth of proteomics are also recalled, ending with a description of the now well-known limitations of two-dimensional gels in proteomics. However, the often-underestimated advantages of two-dimensional gels are also underlined, leading to a description of how and when to use two-dimensional gels for the best in a proteomics approach. Taking support of these advantages (robustness, resolution, and ability to separate entire, intact proteins), possible future applications of this technique in proteomics are also mentioned.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anderson, N. L., & Anderson, N. G. (2002) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r200007-mcp200 · Cited by 4,414
Global analysis of protein expression in yeast
Ghaemmaghami, S., Huh, W.-K., Bower, K., Howson, R. W., Belle, A., Dephoure, N., O'Shea, E. K., & Weissman, J. S. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02046 · Cited by 3,750
Lu, P., Vogel, C., Wang, R., Yao, X., & Marcotte, E. M. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1270 · Cited by 1,139
Molecular analysis of genetic differences between Mycobacterium bovis BCG and virulent M. bovis
Mahairas, G. G., Sabo, P. J., Hickey, M. J., Singh, D. C., & Stover, C. K. (1996) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.178.5.1274-1282.1996 · Cited by 1,103
Proteomics Analysis of Cellular Response to Oxidative Stress
Rabilloud, T., Heller, M., Gasnier, F., Luche, S., Rey, C., Aebersold, R., Benahmed, M., Louisot, P., & Lunardi, J. (2002) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m106585200 · Cited by 393
Self-citationKanski, J., Behring, A., Pelling, J., & Schöneich, C. (2005) · American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01030.2003 · Cited by 217
Cited by
Target Identification for Small Bioactive Molecules: Finding the Needle in the Haystack
Ziegler, S., Pries, V., Hedberg, C., & Waldmann, H. (2013) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201208749 · Cited by 466
Nanoparticle toxicity by the gastrointestinal route: evidence and knowledge gaps
Bergin, I. L., & Witzmann, F. A. (2013) · International Journal of Biomedical Nanoscience and Nanotechnology · doi:10.1504/ijbnn.2013.054515 · Cited by 412
Kuehnbaum, N. L., & Britz-McKibbin, P. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300484s · Cited by 354
Bulked sample analysis in genetics, genomics and crop improvement
Zou, C., Wang, P., & Xu, Y. (2016) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12559 · Cited by 323
Feist, P., & Hummon, A. (2015) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms16023537 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Rabilloud, T., Chevallet, M., Luche, S., & Lelong, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Proteomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2064-2077
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- 1874-3919
- OpenAlex
- W1967306585
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 6
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in proteomics: Past, present and future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jprot.2010.05.016
- The paper
- Rabilloud, T., Chevallet, M., Luche, S., & Lelong, C. (2010). Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in proteomics: Past, present and future. Journal of Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2010.05.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
