Cited by 36Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Using apps for bipolar disorder – An online survey of healthcare provider perspectives and practices

Morton, Emma, Torous, John, Murray, Greg, Michalak, Erin E.·2021·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Background Smartphone apps have recognized potential for improving access to evidence-based care in the treatment of bipolar disorder (BD). Healthcare providers are well-positioned to play a role in guiding patients to access safe, evidence-supported, and trustworthy apps. However, little is known about whether and how clinicians use apps with people with BD: understanding practices and attitudes of healthcare providers is essential to support the implementation of mHealth interventions in a real-world context. Methods A web-based survey was used to explore clinicians' attitudes towards, and use of apps when working with people with BD. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize quantitative findings. Free text responses were investigated using qualitative content analysis. Results Eighty healthcare providers completed the survey. Approximately half of the respondents reported discussing or recommending apps in clinical practice with BD populations. Recommended apps were most commonly related to mood, sleep, and exercise. Barriers to discussing apps included a lack of healthcare provider knowledge/confidence, concerns about patients' ability to access apps, and beliefs that patients lacked interest in apps. Conclusion Although research suggests that people with BD are interested in using apps, uptake of such technology among clinicians is more limited. A lack of clinician knowledge regarding apps, combined with concerns about the digital divide and patient interest, may ac…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.02.047

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morton, E., Torous, J., Murray, G., & Michalak, E. E.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Morton, Emma
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
137
Pages
22-28
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3129468137
Cited by
36
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
bipolar disorder, mobile application, mobile health, clinician attitudes, app recommendations, digital divide, clinician knowledge and confidence, exercise apps
MeSH terms
Bipolar Disorder, Health Personnel, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Telemedicine, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review