Cited by 34Digital Mental Health InterventionsMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Perspectives on the use of acceptance and commitment therapy related mobile apps: Results from a survey of students and professionals

Pierce, Benjamin, P. Twohig, Michael, Levin, Michael E.·2016·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.08.001

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pierce, B., P. Twohig, M., & Levin, M. E.
Affiliations
Utah State University (US)
Corresponding author
Pierce, Benjamin
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
215-224
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2483716051
Cited by
34
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7
FWCI
6.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, mental health apps, mobile application, self-help, adjunctive therapy, practitioners' perceptions, app evaluation criteria, ethical considerations, barriers to app use, therapeutic communities, contextual behavioral science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review