Cited by 13Mental Health via WritingPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchEmotion and Mood Recognition

Artificial intelligence language predictors of two-year trauma-related outcomes

Open access
Oltmanns, Joshua R., Schwartz, H. Andrew, Ruggero, Camilo, Son, Youngseo, Miao, Jiaju, Waszczuk, Monika, Clouston, Sean A.P., Bromet, Evelyn J. +2 more·2021·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background Recent research on artificial intelligence has demonstrated that natural language can be used to provide valid indicators of psychopathology. The present study examined artificial intelligence-based language predictors (ALPs) of seven trauma-related mental and physical health outcomes in responders to the World Trade Center disaster.Methods The responders (N = 174, M age = 55.4 years) provided daily voicemail updates over 14 days. Algorithms developed using machine learning in large social media discovery samples were applied to the voicemail transcriptions to derive ALP scores for several risk factors (depressivity, anxiousness, anger proneness, stress, and personality). Responders also completed self-report assessments of these risk factors at baseline and trauma-related mental and physical health outcomes at two-year follow-up (including symptoms of depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, sleep disturbance, respiratory problems, and GERD).Results Voicemail ALPs were significantly associated with a majority of the trauma-related outcomes at two-year follow-up, over and above corresponding baseline self-reports. ALPs showed significant convergence with corresponding self-report scales, but also considerable uniqueness from each other and from self-report scales.Limitations The study has a relatively short follow-up period relative to trauma occurrence and a limited sample size.Conclusions This study shows evidence that ALPs may provide a novel, objective, and clinically useful approach to forecasting, and may in the future help to identify individuals at risk for negative health outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.09.015

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oltmanns, J. R., Schwartz, H. A., Ruggero, C., Son, Y., Miao, J., Waszczuk, M., Clouston, S. A. P., Bromet, E. J., Luft, B. J., & Kotov, R.
Affiliations
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • University of North Texas (US)
  • Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science (US)
Corresponding author
Oltmanns, Joshua R.
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
143
Pages
239-245
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3160473765
Cited by
13
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA028032-01)
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (U01OH011321)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
natural language processing, World Trade Center responders, disaster responders, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, sleep disorders, respiratory problems, gastroesophageal reflux disease, stress, anger proneness, anxiety, personality, risk prediction, self-report validation
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Artificial Intelligence, Disasters, Humans, Language, Middle Aged, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review