Cited by 256Mental Health via WritingEmotion and Mood RecognitionSentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

Towards Assessing Changes in Degree of Depression through Facebook

Open access
Schwartz, H. Andrew, Eichstaedt, Johannes, Kern, Margaret L., Park, Gregory, Sap, Maarten, Stillwell, David, Kosinski, Michal, Ungar, Lyle·2014·Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology: From Linguistic Signal to Clinical Reality

Abstract

H. Andrew Schwartz, Johannes Eichstaedt, Margaret L. Kern, Gregory Park, Maarten Sap, David Stillwell, Michal Kosinski, Lyle Ungar. Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology: From Linguistic Signal to Clinical Reality. 2014.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3115/v1/w14-3214

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To guard against overfitting, no adjustments were made to the models, and thus this can be considered an evaluation of the models exactly as they were presented in their respective papers.

    “Importantly, to guard against overfitting, no adjustments were made to the models, and thus this can be considered an evaluation of the models exactly as they were presented in their respective papers (Park et al., 2015; Schwartz et al., 2014).”

    From World Trade Center responders in their own words: predicting PTSD symptom trajectories with AI-based language analyses of interviews (2023) · cites this paper as Schwartz et al., 2014

    The “Degree of depression” section describes the original regression models and how they were trained. The cited paper cannot establish whether the citing authors made no adjustments to those models or whether their later evaluation used them exactly as presented; it does not address that overfitting precaution. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Aaron T Beck, Calvin H Ward, Mock Mendelson, Jeremiah Mock, and JK Erbaugh. 1961. An inven- tory for measuring depression. Archives of general psychiatry, 4(6):561.
  2. Aartjan TF Beekman, DJH Deeg, J Van Limbeek, AW Braam, MZ De Vries, W Van Tilburg, et al. 1997. Criterion validity of the Center for Epi- demiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D): re- sults from a community-based sample of older sub- jects in The Netherlands. Psychological medicine, 27(1):231-236.
  3. Dan G Blazer, Ronald C Kessler, and Marvin S Swartz. 1998. Epidemiology of recurrent major and minor depression with a seasonal pattern. The National Co- morbidity Survey. The British Journal of Psychia- try, 172(2):164-167.
  4. Munmun De Choudhury, Scott Counts, and Eric Horvitz. 2013a. Predicting postpartum changes in emotion and behavior via social media. In Pro- ceedings of the 2013 ACM annual conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 3267- 3276. ACM.
  5. Munmun De Choudhury, Michael Gamon, Scott Counts, and Eric Horvitz. 2013b. Predicting de- pression via social media. In AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
  6. R Katikalapudi, Sriram Chellappan, Frances Mont- gomery, Donald Wunsch, and Karl Lutzen. 2012. Associating Internet usage with depressive behav- ior among college students. Technology and Society Magazine, IEEE, 31(4):73-80.
  7. Ronald C Kessler, Howard G Birnbaum, Victoria Shahly, Evelyn Bromet, Irving Hwang, Katie A McLaughlin, Nancy Sampson, Laura Helena An- drade, Giovanni de Girolamo, Koen Demyttenaere, et al. 2010. Age differences in the prevalence and co-morbidity of DSM-IV major depressive episodes: results from the WHO World Mental Health Survey Initiative. Depression and anxiety, 27(4):351-364.
  8. Raymond W Lam and Robert D Levitan. 2000. Patho- physiology of seasonal affective disorder: a review. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 25(5):469.
  9. Andres Magnusson and Timo Partonen. 2005. Focus Points. CNS Spectr, 10(8):625-634.
  10. Peter Paul A Mersch, Hermine M Middendorp, An- toinette L Bouhuys, Domien GM Beersma, and Rut- ger H van den Hoofdakker. 1999. Seasonal affec- tive disorder and latitude: a review of the literature. Journal of affective disorders, 53(1):35-48.
  11. Gregory J Meyer, Stephen E Finn, Lorraine D Eyde, Gary G Kay, Kevin L Moreland, Robert R Dies, Elena J Eisman, Tom W Kubiszyn, and Geoffrey M Reed. 2001. Psychological testing and psycholog- ical assessment: A review of evidence and issues. American psychologist, 56(2):128-165.
  12. Saif M. Mohammad, Svetlana Kiritchenko, and Xiao- dan Zhu. 2013. NRC-Canada: Building the State- of-the-Art in Sentiment Analysis of Tweets. In Pro- ceedings of the seventh international workshop on Semantic Evaluation Exercises (SemEval-2013), At- lanta, Georgia, USA, June.
  13. Megan A Moreno, Lauren A Jelenchick, Katie G Egan, Elizabeth Cox, Henry Young, Kerry E Gannon, and Tara Becker. 2011. Feeling bad on Face- book: Depression disclosures by college students on a social networking site. Depression and anxiety, 28(6):447-455.
  14. Yair Neuman, Yohai Cohen, Dan Assaf, and Gabbi Kedma. 2012. Proactive screening for depression through metaphorical and automatic text analysis. Artificial intelligence in medicine, 56(1):19-25.
  15. Sungkyu Park, Sang Won Lee, Jinah Kwak, Meeyoung Cha, and Bumseok Jeong. 2013. Activities on Face- book Reveal the Depressive State of Users. Journal of medical Internet research, 15(10).
  16. Leora N Rosen, Steven D Targum, Michael Terman, Michael J Bryant, Howard Hoffman, Siegfried F Kasper, Joelle R Hamovit, John P Docherty, Betty Welch, and Norman E Rosenthal. 1990. Prevalence of seasonal affective disorder at four latitudes. Psy- chiatry research, 31(2):131-144.
  17. C Thompson. 2001. Evidence-based treatment. Sea- sonal affective disorder: practice and research, pages 151-158.
  18. Asa Westrin and Raymond W Lam. 2007. Seasonal affective disorder: a clinical update. Annals of Clin- ical Psychiatry, 19(4):239-246.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwartz, H. A., Eichstaedt, J., Kern, M. L., Park, G., Sap, M., Stillwell, D., Kosinski, M., & Ungar, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology: From Linguistic Signal to Clinical Reality
Published
2014
Pages
118-125
OpenAlex
W2154887492
Cited by
256
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2
FWCI
27.49
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology (CLPsych) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Keywords
depression, Facebook, social media, sentiment analysis, mental health monitoring, longitudinal change detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review