Cited by 22Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationWorkplace Health and Well-being

Long-term efficacy of cognitive–behavioral therapy by general practitioners for fatigue: A 4-year follow-up study

Leone, Stephanie S., Huibers, Marcus J.H., Kant, IJmert, van Amelsvoort, Ludovic G.P.M., van Schayck, Constant P., Bleijenberg, Gijs, Knottnerus, J. André·2006·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Objective In an earlier study, we found that cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) delivered by general practitioners (GPs) for fatigue among employees on sick leave was not effective after 12 months. In this study we aim to assess the long-term efficacy of CBT by GPs for fatigue. It was hypothesized that the intervention could prevent deterioration as well as relapse of fatigue complaints and relapse into absenteeism in the long term.Methods Patients who participated in the original randomized controlled trial were followed up 4 years later. Fatigue and absenteeism were the main outcomes.Results Fatigue and absenteeism were high in the intervention and control groups at the 4-year follow-up. There was no significant difference between the intervention group and the control group on fatigue and absenteeism. The intervention group however tended toward less-favorable outcomes as compared with the control group.Conclusions Like that of chronic fatigue syndrome, the prognosis of less-advanced fatigue is rather poor. CBT delivered by GPs is not effective in the long term.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.04.010

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At follow-ups longer than 12 months post-treatment, two studies reported non-significant effects on fatigue severity: g = 0.12 (95% CI -0.23 to 0.47) and g = -0.21 (95% CI -0.47 to 0.05).

    “For follow-ups longer than 12 months post-treatment, two studies provided information on fatigue severity: [45] reported a ~ 3.5-year follow-up to [46] (g = 0.12, 95%CI -0.23 to 0.47), and [47] reported a two-year follow-up to [42] (g = -0.21, 95%CI -0.47 to 0.05).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leone, S. S., Huibers, M. J. H., Kant, I., van Amelsvoort, L. G. P. M., van Schayck, C. P., Bleijenberg, G., & Knottnerus, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Leone, Stephanie S.
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-11
Volume
61
Issue
5
Pages
601-607
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144544411
Cited by
22
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, fatigue, general practitioners, long-term efficacy, absenteeism, sick leave, relapse, chronic fatigue syndrome, workplace health promotion
MeSH terms
Absenteeism, Adult, Family Practice, Fatigue, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Sick Leave, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review