Cited by 99Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Health anxiety, rumination, and negative affect: A mediational analysis

Marcus, David K., Hughes, Kathleen T., Arnau, Randolph C.·2008·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Objective A ruminative cognitive style has been associated with a variety of mood and anxiety disorders. This study examined whether a ruminative cognitive style is associated with health anxiety, even when controlling for negative affect. Method College students (N=198) completed measures of health anxiety, rumination, and negative affect and estimated the likelihood that ambiguous symptoms were indicative of catastrophic illnesses. These data were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Results A ruminative cognitive style was both indirectly associated with health anxiety via its strong relationship with negative affect and was also directly associated with health anxiety. Furthermore, catastrophizing ambiguous symptoms was also directly related to health anxiety. Conclusion High health anxiety individuals not only hold dysfunctional beliefs about health and illness but they also think about their distress in a ruminative manner. A more complete cognitive-behavioral model of health anxiety should include not only cognitive contents ("what") but also cognitive style ("how").

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.02.004

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marcus, D. K., Hughes, K. T., & Arnau, R. C.
Affiliations
University of Southern Mississippi (US)
Corresponding author
Marcus, David K.
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
64
Issue
5
Pages
495-501
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982809109
Cited by
99
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aquila Digital Community (University of Southern Mississippi) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
health anxiety, rumination, negative affect, catastrophizing, cognitive style, cognitive-behavioral model, university students, illness beliefs
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Anxiety Disorders, Attitude to Health, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review