Cited by 163Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesCancer survivorship and care

Suicide risk in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of current literature

Pompili, Maurizio, Forte, Alberto, Palermo, Mario, Stefani, Henry, Lamis, Dorian A., Serafini, Gianluca, Amore, Mario, Girardi, Paolo·2012·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Background Studies have shown that suicidal ideation is often revealed among patients suffering from Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Mental health assessment of physically ill patients should form part of routine clinical evaluation, particularly in chronic illness.Objective The aim of the present paper was to investigate whether there was a relationship between MS and suicidal behavior.Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted to determine the potential association between MS and suicidal behavior. A total of 12 articles from peer-reviewed journals were considered and selected for this review.Results Most studies have documented a higher suicide rate in patients with MS compared to the general population, and suicide was associated with several risk factors: Depression severity, social isolation, younger age, progressive disease subtype, lower income, earlier disease course, higher levels of physical disability, and not driving.Conclusions Clinicians should be aware of the fact that suicidality may occur with higher frequency in MS patients, the available data suggest that the risk of self-harm is higher than expected in MS patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.09.011

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pompili, M., Forte, A., Palermo, M., Stefani, H., Lamis, D. A., Serafini, G., Amore, M., & Girardi, P.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea (IT)
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Genoa (IT)
Corresponding author
Pompili, Maurizio
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
73
Issue
6
Pages
411-417
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023102395
Cited by
163
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 7
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, suicide risk, suicidal ideation, depression, social isolation, physical disability, socioeconomic factors, mental health assessment, chronic disease
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Multiple Sclerosis, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Social Isolation, Suicide, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review