Cited by 32Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Validation of the German version of the Bodily Distress Syndrome 25 checklist in a representative German population sample

Schmalbach, Bjarne, Roenneberg, Casper, Hausteiner-Wiehle, Constanze, Henningsen, Peter, Brähler, Elmar, Zenger, Markus, Häuser, Winfried·2020·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Objective The Bodily Distress Syndrome 25 (BDS 25) checklist is a self-report instrument that can be used for case finding of a BDS in both clinical practice and research. We assessed the reliability and the internal and external validity of the German version of the BDS 25 in a sample of the general German population.Methods The psychometric properties of the BDS 25 German were examined in a representative cross-sectional German population survey which included 2386 persons aged ≥14 years. Validation instruments included the Somatic Symptom Scale 8, the Giessen Subjective Complaints List 8 and the Patient Health Questionnaire 4. Participants were asked if they had been diagnosed with fibromyalgia or irritable bowel syndrome by a physician in the past.Results The acceptance was high. Only 81 (2.3%) single items were not answered. Internal consistency was sufficiently high for all four subscales and the total score (α > 0.800). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed clear evidence for a four-factorial structure with cardiopulmonary, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal and general symptoms. Moderate to high correlations with other measures of somatic and psychological symptom burden were found. In latent class analysis, the model featuring three classes with no, moderate and severe BDS symptoms evinced the best model fit. Participants with self-reported fibromyalgia and irritable bowel syndrome were mainly found in the moderate and severe BDS group.Conclusions The BDS 25 German has excellent psychometric properties to screen for BDS in the general population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.109991

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmalbach, B., Roenneberg, C., Hausteiner-Wiehle, C., Henningsen, P., Brähler, E., Zenger, M., & Häuser, W.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • IFB Adiposity Diseases (DE)
Corresponding author
Häuser, Winfried
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
132
Pages
109991
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3010312292
Cited by
32
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
German version, psychometric validation, somatic symptom burden, case finding, fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, factor structure, latent class analysis, general population
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Body Image, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Germany, Humans, Language, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review