The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Testing competing models of loss aversion: an adversarial collaboration
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The first stage of the adversarial collaborative process calls for participants to work together to form a clear understanding of one another's theoretical commitments and disagreements (Bateman et al., 2005; Cowan et al., 2020; Peters et al., 2025).”
From Integrated information and predictive processing theories of consciousness: An adversarial collaborative review (2026) · cites this paper as Bateman et al., 2005
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Self-citationProspect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
Self-citationAdvances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00122574 · Cited by 15,467
Self-citationLoss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2937956 · Cited by 6,432
Self-citationStatus quo bias in decision making
Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00055564 · Cited by 5,897
Toward a positive theory of consumer choice
Thaler, R. H. (1980) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7 · Cited by 5,796
Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261737 · Cited by 3,194
Self-citationExperimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem
Kahneman, D. J., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175197.009 · Cited by 2,870
Self-citationMyopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle
Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1995) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118511 · Cited by 2,487
Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk
Starmer, C. (2000) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.38.2.332 · Cited by 1,885
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kahneman, Daniel, Novemsky, Novemsky, (2002). Loss aversion in risky and riskless transactions: choices, exchanges and gambles. Mimeo, Princeton University.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–211 of 211
Chan, E. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197695845.003.0003
Chan, E. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197695845.002.0004
Chan, E. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197695845.002.0007
Toward Confucian Republicanism I
Chan, E. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197695845.003.0008
Chan, E. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197695845.003.0011
Cultivation without Oppression
Chan, E. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197695845.003.0010
Chan, E. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197695845.003.0002
Chan, E. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197695845.003.0007
As Virtuous as Heaven and Earth
Chan, E. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197695845.003.0004
Ziv, G., Levin, O., & Masiulis, N. (2026) · Kinesiology Review · doi:10.1123/kr.2025-0076
AI assists adversarial collaboration in debate on minority salience
Mellers, B. A., Yuan, L., Zhou, Y., Mauboussin, I., Lao, E. C., Corio, B., Satopää, V., Ungar, L., Bhatia, S., Clark, C. J., et al. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2535311123
Metadata
- Authors
- Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R.
- Affiliations
- University of East Anglia (GB)
- Princeton University (US)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Sugden, Robert
- Venue
- Journal of Public Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1561-1580
- ISSN
- 0047-2727 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035788915
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 3.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Public Economics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of East Anglia
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Keywords
- loss aversion, willingness to pay, willingness to accept, contingent valuation, adversarial collaboration, framing effects, cost-benefit valuation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review