Cited by 211Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsEconomic and Environmental ValuationExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Testing competing models of loss aversion: an adversarial collaboration

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 29 references

4 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kahneman, Daniel, Novemsky, Novemsky, (2002). Loss aversion in risky and riskless transactions: choices, exchanges and gambles. Mimeo, Princeton University.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R.
Affiliations
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Sugden, Robert
Venue
Journal of Public Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-08
Volume
89
Issue
8
Pages
1561-1580
ISSN
0047-2727 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035788915
Cited by
208
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Public Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of East Anglia
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
loss aversion, willingness to pay, willingness to accept, contingent valuation, adversarial collaboration, framing effects, cost-benefit valuation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review