The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Testing competing models of loss aversion: an adversarial collaboration
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The first stage of the adversarial collaborative process calls for participants to work together to form a clear understanding of one another's theoretical commitments and disagreements (Bateman et al., 2005; Cowan et al., 2020; Peters et al., 2025).”
From Integrated information and predictive processing theories of consciousness: An adversarial collaborative review (2026) · cites this paper as Bateman et al., 2005
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Self-citationProspect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
Self-citationAdvances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00122574 · Cited by 15,467
Self-citationLoss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2937956 · Cited by 6,432
Self-citationStatus quo bias in decision making
Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00055564 · Cited by 5,897
Toward a positive theory of consumer choice
Thaler, R. H. (1980) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7 · Cited by 5,796
Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261737 · Cited by 3,194
Self-citationExperimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem
Kahneman, D. J., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175197.009 · Cited by 2,870
Self-citationMyopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle
Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1995) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118511 · Cited by 2,487
Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk
Starmer, C. (2000) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.38.2.332 · Cited by 1,885
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kahneman, Daniel, Novemsky, Novemsky, (2002). Loss aversion in risky and riskless transactions: choices, exchanges and gambles. Mimeo, Princeton University.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Isoni, A., Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.2.991 · Cited by 615
Self-citationIndividual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices
Gächter, S., Johnson, E. J., & Herrmann, A. P. (2021) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-021-09839-8 · Cited by 533
Thinking like a trader selectively reduces individuals' loss aversion
Sokol-Hessner, P., Hsu, M., Curley, N. G., Delgado, M. R., Camerer, C. F., & Phelps, E. A. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0806761106 · Cited by 452
Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research
Christensen, G., & Miguel, E. A. (2018) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20171350 · Cited by 484
Pre-registration in social psychology—A discussion and suggested template
Veer, A. V. '., & Giner‐Sorolla, R. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.03.004 · Cited by 464
Swedberg, R. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519.002 · Cited by 471
Risk Preferences Around the World
Rieger, M. O., Wang, M., & Hens, T. (2014) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2013.1869 · Cited by 372
Explanations of the endowment effect: an integrative review
Morewedge, C. K., & Giblin, C. E. (2015) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.04.004 · Cited by 371
Ho, T., & Zhang, J. (2008) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1070.0788 · Cited by 318
Modeling the Psychology of Consumer and Firm Behavior with Behavioral Economics
Ho, T., Lim, N., & Camerer, C. F. (2006) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.3.307 · Cited by 263
A new meta-analysis on the WTP/WTA disparity
Tunçel, T., & Hammitt, J. K. (2014) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2014.06.001 · Cited by 229
The trade-off between money and travel time: A test of the theory of reference-dependent preferences
Borger, B. D., & Fosgerau, M. (2007) · Journal of Urban Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jue.2007.09.001 · Cited by 183
A Reference Price Theory of the Endowment Effect
Weaver, R., & Frederick, S. (2012) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.09.0103 · Cited by 176
Preference Anomalies, Preference Elicitation and the Discovered Preference Hypothesis
Braga, J., & Starmer, C. (2005) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-005-6028-0 · Cited by 167
Self-citationNeural Antecedents of the Endowment Effect
Knutson, B. D., Wimmer, G. E., Rick, S. I., Hollon, N. G., Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.05.018 · Cited by 162
The Psychological and Neural Basis of Loss Aversion
Sokol‐Hessner, P., & Rutledge, R. B. (2018) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721418806510 · Cited by 167
Functional magnetic resonance imaging in consumer research: A review and application
Reimann, M., Schilke, O. S., Weber, B., Neuhaus, C., & Zaichkowsky, J. L. (2011) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20403 · Cited by 137
(2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519 · Cited by 154
Chib, V. S., De Martino, B., Shimojo, S., & O'Doherty, J. P. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.02.038 · Cited by 130
The Effect of Reference Point on Stochastic Network Equilibrium
Avineri, E. (2006) · Transportation Science · doi:10.1287/trsc.1060.0158 · Cited by 130
Mrkva, K., Johnson, E. J., Gächter, S., & Herrmann, A. P. (2019) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1156 · Cited by 134
The effect of horizontal eye movements on free recall: a preregistered adversarial collaboration.
Matzke, D., Nieuwenhuis, S., van Rijn, H., Slagter, H., van der Molen, M. W., & Wagenmakers, E. (2015) · Journal of experimental psychology. General · doi:10.1037/xge0000038 · Cited by 148
MAOA-L carriers are better at making optimal financial decisions under risk
Frydman, C., Camerer, C. F., Bossaerts, P. L., & Rangel, A. (2010) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2304 · Cited by 116
All over the map: A worldwide comparison of risk preferences
L’Haridon, O., & Vieider, F. M. (2019) · Quantitative Economics · doi:10.3982/qe898 · Cited by 126
Losses, gains, and brains: Neuroeconomics can help to answer open questions about loss aversion
Rick, S. I. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2010.04.004 · Cited by 113
Predicting purchase decision: The role of hemispheric asymmetry over the frontal cortex.
Ravaja, N., Somervuori, O., & Salminen, M. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics · doi:10.1037/a0029949 · Cited by 105
A Canonical Model of Choice with Initial Endowments
Masatlıoĝlu, Y., & Ok, E. A. (2013) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdt037 · Cited by 103
Identification of Parameters for a Prospect Theory Model for Travel Choice Analysis
Avineri, E., & Bovy, P. H. L. (2008) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/2082-17 · Cited by 90
Neural evidence for Reference-dependence in real-market-transactions
Weber, B., Aholt, A., Neuhaus, C., Trautner, P., Elger, C. E., & Teichert, T. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.034 · Cited by 83
A Meta-analysis of Loss Aversion in Product Choice
Neumann, N., & Böckenholt, U. (2014) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2014.02.002 · Cited by 83
How much has the Sun influenced Northern Hemisphere temperature trends? An ongoing debate
Connolly, R., Soon, W., Connolly, M., Baliunas, S. L., Berglund, J., Butler, C. J., Cionco, R. G., Elias, A. G., Федоров, В. М., Harde, H., et al. (2021) · Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1088/1674-4527/21/6/131 · Cited by 72
Alempaki, D., Canic, E., Mullett, T. L., Skylark, W. J., Starmer, C., Stewart, N., & Tufano, F. (2019) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2018.3170 · Cited by 58
Self-citationProcedural Invariance Testing of the One-and-One-Half-Bound Dichotomous Choice Elicitation Method
Bateman, I. J., Day, B., Dupont, D., & Georgiou, S. (2009) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.91.4.806 · Cited by 60
Self-citation(2008) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 58
Bartczak, A. M., Chilton, S., Czajkowski, M., & Meyerhoff, J. (2017) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2017.04.020 · Cited by 60
Repeated Rounds with Price Feedback in Experimental Auction Valuation: An Adversarial Collaboration
Corrigan, J. R., Drichoutis, A. C., Lusk, J. L., Nayga, R. M., & Rousu, M. C. (2011) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/ajae/aar066 · Cited by 55
Now, Women Do Ask: A Call to Update Beliefs about the Gender Pay Gap
Kray, L. J., Kennedy, J. A., & Lee, M. (2023) · Academy of Management Discoveries · doi:10.5465/amd.2022.0021 · Cited by 58
Faccioli, M., Kühfuss, L., & Czajkowski, M. (2018) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-018-0276-2 · Cited by 60
Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics ResearchPreprint
Christensen, G., & Miguel, E. A. (2017) · MetArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/9a3rw · Cited by 58
Other People’s Money: Money’s Perceived Purchasing Power Is Smaller for Others Than for the Self
Polman, E., Effron, D. A., & Thomas, M. R. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx119 · Cited by 51
Cadsby, C. B., Croson, R. T. A., Marks, M. B., & Maynes, E. (2007) · Public Choice · doi:10.1007/s11127-007-9260-z · Cited by 46
An economic analysis of ransomware and its welfare consequences
Hernandez-Castro, J. C., Cartwright, A., & Cartwright, E. J. (2020) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.190023 · Cited by 46
Grossmann, M. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197518977.001.0001 · Cited by 45
Yeung, S. K., Yay, T., & Feldman, G. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672211042315 · Cited by 51
Loss Aversion and Individual Characteristics
Hjorth, K., & Fosgerau, M. (2011) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-010-9455-5 · Cited by 43
New diagnosis in psychiatry: beyond heuristics
McGorry, P. D., Hickie, I. B., Kotov, R., Schmaal, L., Wood, S. J., Allan, S. M., Altınbaş, K., Boyce, N., Bringmann, L. F., Caspi, A., et al. (2025) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s003329172400223x · Cited by 46
Rabeyron, T. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.562992 · Cited by 48
Biel, A., Johansson‐Stenman, O., & Nilsson, A. (2011) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2011.07.010 · Cited by 43
van Winssen, K. P. M., van Kleef, R. C., & van de Ven, W. P. M. M. (2015) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-015-0745-2 · Cited by 40
Investigating Willingness to Pay–Willingness to Accept Asymmetry in Choice Experiments
Lanz, B., Provins, A., Bateman, I. J., Scarpa, R., Willis, K. G., & Özdemiroğlu, E. (2010) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/9781849507738-024 · Cited by 34
Self-citationEstimating Four Hicksian Welfare Measures for a Public Good: A Contingent Valuation Investigation
Bateman, I. J., Langford, I. H., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2000) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3147034 · Cited by 60
Self-citationModelling Individual Preferences, State of the Art, Recent Advances and Future Directions
Cherchi, E. (2012) · UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) · doi:10.25405/ncl.34293189 · Cited by 33
The potential behavioural effect of personal carbon trading: results from an experimental survey
Zanni, A., Bristow, A. L., & Wardman, M. R. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy · doi:10.1080/21606544.2013.782471 · Cited by 33
Who’s biased? A meta-analysis of buyer–seller differences in the pricing of lotteries.
Yechiam, E., Ashby, N. J. S., & Pachur, T. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000095 · Cited by 34
State-dependent congestion pricing with reference-dependent preferences
Lindsey, R. (2011) · Transportation Research Part B Methodological · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2011.06.003 · Cited by 30
Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research
Christensen, G., & Miguel, E. A. (2016) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w22989 · Cited by 32
Modelling the effectiveness of climate policies: How important is loss aversion by consumers?
Knobloch, F., Huijbregts, M. A. J., & Mercure, J.-F. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109419 · Cited by 31
Mabit, S. L., Cherchi, E., Jensen, A. F., & Jordal-Jørgensen, J. (2015) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.08.006 · Cited by 29
Pre-registration and Results-Free Review in Observational and Qualitative Research
Jacobs, A. M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519.009 · Cited by 30
Maniadis, Z., Tufano, F., & List, J. A. (2015) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0193-230620150000018008 · Cited by 29
Advance payment systems: Paying too much today and being satisfied tomorrow
Schulz, F., Schlereth, C., Mažar, N., & Skiera, B. (2015) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.03.003 · Cited by 29
Pre-Registration in Social Psychology—a Discussion and Suggested TemplatePreprint
Veer, A. V. '., & Giner‐Sorolla, R. (2016) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/4frms · Cited by 31
Understanding the reference effect
Masatlıoĝlu, Y., & Uler, N. (2013) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2013.07.009 · Cited by 23
Framing and retirement age: The gap between willingness-to-accept and willingness-to-pay
Merkle, C., Schreiber, P., & Weber, M. (2017) · Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/epolic/eix014 · Cited by 22
Bleichrodt, H., Doctor, J. N., Gao, Y., Li, C., Meeker, D., & Wakker, P. P. (2019) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-019-09318-0 · Cited by 25
Becker random behavior and the as-if defense of rational choice theory in demand analysis
Moscati, I., & Tubaro, P. (2011) · Journal of Economic Methodology · doi:10.1080/1350178x.2011.579147 · Cited by 18
The Potential for Nitrogen Abatement Trading in Agriculture: A Hypothetical Market Experiment
Hansen, L. B., Termansen, M., & Hasler, B. (2019) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12319 · Cited by 20
A Survey on Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and Their Governance
Ding, Q., Liebau, D., Wang, Z., & Xu, W. (2023) · World Scientific Annual Review of Fintech · doi:10.1142/s281100482350001x · Cited by 19
Tunç, D. U., & Tunç, M. N. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/pdm7y · Cited by 20
Modelling Nonlinearities and Reference Dependence in General Practitioners' Income Preferences
Holte, J. H., Sivey, P. M., Abelsen, B., & Olsen, J. A. (2015) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.3208 · Cited by 19
Trading Under the Influence: The Effects of Psychological Ownership on Economic Decision-Making
Dickert, S., Ashby, N. J. S., & Dickert, A. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77158-8_9 · Cited by 21
Keeping your gains close but your money closer: The prepayment effect in riskless choices
Hochman, G., Ayal, S., & Dan Ariely, C. (2014) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2014.01.014 · Cited by 18
Money is no object: Testing the endowment effect in exchange goods
Svirsky, D. (2014) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2014.07.003 · Cited by 17
The endowment effect: Loss aversion or a buy-sell discrepancy?
Smitizsky, G., Liu, W. J., & Uri Gneezy, B. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000880 · Cited by 17
Kogler, C., Kühberger, A., & Gilhofer, R. (2013) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2013.05.001 · Cited by 18
Cash in hand and savings decisions
Spantig, L. (2021) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2021.06.008 · Cited by 15
Making Research Data Accessible
Kapiszewski, D., & Karcher, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519.008 · Cited by 15
Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: AThinking & Reasoninginitiative
Rakow, T., Thompson, V. L., Ball, L. J., & Markovits, H. (2014) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2015.975405 · Cited by 15
Replicability and the Psychology of Science
Clark, C. J., Honeycutt, N., & Jussim, L. J. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-04968-2_3 · Cited by 13
Rakow, T. (2022) · Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-04968-2_16 · Cited by 13
Falsificationist Treatment of Auxiliary Hypotheses in Social and Behavioral Sciences
Tunç, D. U., & Tunç, M. N. (2023) · Meta-Psychology · doi:10.15626/mp.2021.2756 · Cited by 32
A Systems Approach to Understanding and Improving Research Integrity
Gorman, D. M., Elkins, A. D., & Lawley, M. (2017) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9986-z · Cited by 14
Lim, S.-L., & Bruce, A. S. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00330 · Cited by 14
Satisfaction (Mis)pricing Revisited: Real? Really Big?
Bharadwaj, S. G., & Mitra, D. (2016) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.16.0236 · Cited by 12
Reflections on adversarial collaboration from the adversaries: was it worth it?
Isch, C. G., Tetlock, P. E., & Clark, C. J. (2025) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/s11186-025-09634-2 · Cited by 13
Asymmetries in Exchange Behavior Incorrectly Interpreted as Evidence of Prospect TheoryPreprint
Plott, C. R., & Zeiler, K. (2005) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.775024 · Cited by 11
A Survey on Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and Their GovernancePreprint
Ding, Q., Liebau, D., Wang, Z., & Xu, W. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4378966 · Cited by 11
Economic Analysis of RansomwarePreprint
Hernandez-Castro, J. C., Cartwright, E. J., & Stepanova, A. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2937641 · Cited by 10
Why do women choose home births
Grünebaum, A., & Chervenak, F. A. (2024) · Journal of Perinatal Medicine · doi:10.1515/jpm-2024-0175 · Cited by 11
The Seller's Sense: Buying–Selling Perspective Affects the Sensitivity to Expected Value Differences
Yechiam, E., Abofol, T., & Pachur, T. (2016) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1937 · Cited by 8
Support for Transnational Conservation in a Gain-Loss Context
Vogdrup-Schmidt, M., Strange, N., & Thorsen, B. J. (2019) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.026 · Cited by 9
Adaptive loss aversion and market experience
Lindsay, L. (2019) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2019.09.023 · Cited by 8
Halvorsen, T. (2015) · Rationality and Society · doi:10.1177/1043463115605302 · Cited by 7
Cao, Z., Zou, Y., Zhao, X., Hong, K., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math9040430 · Cited by 7
Some Methodological Issues in Experimental Economics
Mayo, D. G. (2008) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/594510 · Cited by 7
Emotions, Morality and Public Goods: The WTA-WTP Disparity Revisited
Nilsson, A., Johansson‐Stenman, O., & Biel, A. (2006) · Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University) · Cited by 7
An experiment on aspiration-based choice
Guney, B., & Richter, M. (2015) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.09.012 · Cited by 6
Why Do Investors Buy Structured Products? A Behavioral Finance Explanation
Helberger, D. (2012) · The Journal of Wealth Management · doi:10.3905/jwm.2012.14.4.051 · Cited by 6
The endowment effect with different possession times and types of items
Colucci, D., Franco, C., & Valori, V. (2024) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2024.102216 · Cited by 5
Reliability of Inference: Analogs of Replication in Qualitative Research
Fairfield, T., & Charman, A. E. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519.012 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R.
- Affiliations
- University of East Anglia (GB)
- Princeton University (US)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Sugden, Robert
- Venue
- Journal of Public Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1561-1580
- ISSN
- 0047-2727 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035788915
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 3.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Public Economics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of East Anglia
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Keywords
- loss aversion, willingness to pay, willingness to accept, contingent valuation, adversarial collaboration, framing effects, cost-benefit valuation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review