Cited by 2,487Financial Markets and Investment StrategiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis

Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle

Open access
Benartzi, S., Thaler, R. H.·1995·The Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract

The equity premium puzzle refers to the empirical fact that stocks have outperformed bonds over the last century by a surprisingly large margin. We offer a new explanation based on two behavioral concepts. First, investors are assumed to be “loss averse,” meaning that they are distinctly more sensitive to losses than to gains. Second, even long-term investors are assumed to evaluate their portfolios frequently. We dub this combination “myopic loss aversion.” Using simulations, we find that the size of the equity premium is consistent with the previously estimated parameters of prospect theory if investors evaluate their portfolios annually.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2118511

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Real-world data show loss-averse behavior in stock markets, pricing and purchasing of consumables and condominiums, and choice of work hours by cabdrivers.

    “This work has been supported by analyses of real world data that show similar behavior in, among other situations, stock markets (26–28), the pricing and purchasing of consumables (29, 30) and condominiums (31), and the choice of work hours by cabdrivers (32).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Banz, A. W. "The Relationship between Return and Market Value of Common Stoóks," Journal of Financial Economics, 9, 1981, 3-18.
  2. Black, F. "The Tax Consequences of Long-Run Pension Policy," Financial Analysts Journal, July-August 1980, 21-28
  3. Blinder, A.S. Why are Prices Sticky? Preliminary Results from an Interview Study," American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 81, May 1991, 89-96.
  4. Constantinides, G. M., "Habit Formation: A Resolution of the Equity Premium Puzzle," Journal of Political Economy 1990, 519-543.
  5. Keim, D. "Size-Related Anomalies and Stock Return Seasonality: Further Empirical Evidence," Journal of Financial Economics, June 1983, 13-32.
  6. Libby, R. and P. C. Fishbum, "Behavioral Models of Risk Taking in Business, Journal of Accounting Research, Autumn 1977, 272-292.
  7. Mehra, R., and E. C. Prescott, "The Equity Premium Puzzle," Journal of Moneta,y Economics 1985, 145-161.
  8. Reitz, T., "The Equity Risk Premium: A Solution?," Journal of Moneta,y Economics 1988, 117-132.
  9. Samuelson, P. A., "Lifetime Portfolio Selection by Dynamic Stochastic Programming," Review of Economics and Statistics, LI, 1969, 238-246.
  10. Siegel, J. J. "The Equity Premium: Stock and Bond Returns Since 1802,' Financial Analysts Journal, January-February 1992, 28-38.
  11. Swalm, R. 0., "Utility Theory--Insights into Risk Taking," Harvard Business Review, November/December 1966, 123-136.
  12. Tversky, A., and M. Bar-Hillel, "Risk: The Long Run and the Short,' Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning, Memory, and Cognition 9, 1983, 713-717.
  13. Weil, Philippe, "The Equity Premium Puzzle and the Risk-free Rate Puzzle,' Journal of Monetary Economics, 24, 1989, 401-421.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
1995-02-01
Volume
110
Issue
1
Pages
73-92
ISSN
  • 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4650
OpenAlex
W1977145788
Cited by
2,487
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 98 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 106 · 2021: 121 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 99 · 2018: 148 · 2017: 112 · 2016: 104 · 2015: 88 · 2014: 108 · 2013: 98 · 2012: 103
FWCI
22.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Keywords
equity premium puzzle, loss aversion, myopic loss aversion, prospect theory, portfolio rebalancing, behavioral finance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review