The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social norms and energy conservation
Abstract
This paper evaluates a series of programs run by a company called OPOWER to send Home Energy Report letters to residential utility customers comparing their electricity use to that of their neighbors. Using data from randomized natural field experiments at 600,000 treatment and control households across the United States, I estimate that the average program reduces energy consumption by 2.0%. The program provides additional evidence that non-price interventions can substantially and cost effectively change consumer behavior: the effect is equivalent to that of a short-run electricity price increase of 11 to 20%, and the cost effectiveness compares favorably to that of traditional energy conservation programs. Perhaps because the treatment included descriptive social norms, effects are heterogeneous: households in the highest decile of pre-treatment consumption decrease usage by 6.3%, while consumption by the lowest decile decreases by only 0.3%. A regression discontinuity design shows that different categories of “injunctive norms” played an insignificant role in encouraging relatively low users not to increase usage.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A large meta-analysis found that significant residential energy savings can be achieved [215], by targeting the right interventions to the right households [14,16,17].”
From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cites
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7466396 · Cited by 20,065
How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates?
Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355304772839588 · Cited by 10,641
A Theory of the Allocation of Time
Becker, G. S. (1965) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2228949 · Cited by 10,354
Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies
Rubin, D. B. (1974) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0037350 · Cited by 9,436 · cited 2×
“Nearly all are within the confidence intervals of the small sample pilots by Schultz et al. (2007) and Nolan et al.”
BackgroundA Simple Model of Herd Behavior
Banerjee, A. V. (1992) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118364 · Cited by 6,556 · cited 1×
“[15] Banerjee, Abhijit (1992).”
Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015 · Cited by 5,965 · cited 2×
“[32] Cialdini, Robert, Raymond Reno, and Carl Kallgren (1990).”
BackgroundAkerlof, G., & Kranton, R. (2000) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355300554881 · Cited by 5,824 · cited 1×
“[5] Akerlof, George, and Rachel Kranton (2000).”
Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation
Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.47.1.5 · Cited by 4,926
Regression discontinuity designs in economics
Lee, D. S., & Lemieux, T. (2010) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.48.2.281 · Cited by 4,534
Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice
Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2007) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.001 · Cited by 3,701
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Friedrich, 2009, Saving Energy Cost-Effectively: A National Review of the Cost of Energy Saved through Utility-Sector Energy Efficiency Programs
- Lalonde, 1986, Evaluating the Econometric Evaluations of Training Programs, American Economic Review, 76, 604
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 2,001–2,100 of 2,706
The intentionality of influence: Disentangling usability optimisation from nudging in design
Bansal, R., & Varghese, J. (2026) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102398 · Cited by 1
Electric vehicle adoption and energy prices: Empirical evidence from four Nordic countries
Zhang, X., Xu, J., Zheng, Y., Sarı, R., & Chu, Y. (2026) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2026.109148 · Cited by 3
Castro-Cárdenas, C., Gaytán, E. A. A., & Ozuna, T. (2026) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2025.115064 · Cited by 1
Spatola, N. (2026) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.70053 · Cited by 1
When do peers influence preventive health behavior? Evidence from breast cancer screening
Redler, P., & Reichel, F. (2026) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107391 · Cited by 1
Can health information promote active transport?
Ahlvik, L., & Sahari, A. (2026) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2026.104896 · Cited by 2
Cüce, E., & Cuce, P. M. (2026) · Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry · doi:10.1007/s10973-026-15345-2 · Cited by 1
Do The Effects of Nudges Persist? Theory and Evidence from 38 Natural Field Experiments
Brandon, A., Ferraro, P. J., List, J. A., Metcalfe, R., Price, M. K., & Rundhammer, F. (2026) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdag012 · Cited by 41
Mwakalinga, V. M., & Samli, S. S. (2026) · City and Environment Interactions · doi:10.1016/j.cacint.2026.100320 · Cited by 1
A better nudge definition for behavioral public policy
Tor, A. (2026) · Policy and Society · doi:10.1093/polsoc/puag002 · Cited by 1
Ziemann, N., Hoffmann, C., Kathe, F., & Müsgens, F. (2026) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2026.107503 · Cited by 1
Social image in context: The role of social norms and social networks
Adloff, S., & Pondorfer, A. (2026) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2026.107506 · Cited by 1
Validating a survey measure of conditional cooperation
Fallucchi, F., Leina, A. M., & Quercia, S. (2026) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2026.102901 · Cited by 1
Ajorlou, E., Pourmatin, M., Farhadzadeh, A., Ghayoomi, M., & Hewitt, E. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0345154 · Cited by 1
Housing for well-being with minimal energy and material demand
Zhang, J., Johnson-Wang, M., Khanna, N. Z., van Valkengoed, A. M., Xu, M., Mastrucci, A., Jia, X., Pan, Y., Steg, L., Roy, J., et al. (2026) · Nature Reviews Clean Technology · doi:10.1038/s44359-026-00159-0 · Cited by 3
Environmental Information or Social Norm? A Ladder Toward Environmentally Sustainable Food Choices
Inoue, R., & Kawasaki, K. (2026) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/1477-9552.70043 · Cited by 1
From Awareness to Action? The Impact of CO2 Emission Feedback on Student LLM Usage
Andersen, L. B., Herklotz, M., Liu, A., Goeke, M., Jülich, M., Kern, C. A., & Kreuter, F. (2026) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3772363.3798840 · Cited by 2
“To improve the interpretability and comparability of the reported In line with our understanding of responsible AI, a sustainability policy is most likely to gain acceptance when it is grounded in transparency and traceability [2, 8, 21].”
Aging and energy transition in rural China: Micro-level evidence from Shaanxi
Tang, H., Mao, H., & Cai, Y. (2026) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115334 · Cited by 1
Bartels, L. E., & Kesternich, M. (2026) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2026.102902 · Cited by 1
Climate nudging, catastrophes, and cost benefit analysis
DesRoches, C. T., Bartha, P. F. A., Mintz‐Woo, K., et al. (2026) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-026-00740-1 · Cited by 1
“This behav - ioral intervention leverages social comparison and behavioral norms to encourage energy-saving behavior (Allcott, 2011).”
Heinz, E., Sovacool, B. K., Kwan, T. A., Nordensvärd, J., Urban, F., Asif, M., Zhang, W., Thollander, P., Rohdin, P., & Arvidsson, N. (2026) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109058 · Cited by 2
Improving payment for essential services – A field experiment in Nairobi, Kenya
de la Fuente, D., Mwaura, M., Gitu, J. W., Mulwa, R. M., & Cook, J. (2026) · Utilities Policy · doi:10.1016/j.jup.2026.102240 · Cited by 1
Unveiling the role of peer influence in the adoption of eco-friendly smartphones
Gupta, O. J., & Choudhury, M. (2026) · International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences · doi:10.1108/ijqss-09-2025-0226 · Cited by 2
Wies, C., Messner, J., Merl, N. B., et al. (2026) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2026.116898 · Cited by 1
Song, K., Lee, S. H., Raimi, K. T., & Hart, P. S. (2026) · Energy Efficiency · doi:10.1007/s12053-026-10454-1 · Cited by 1
“Most interventions targeting residential energy consumption with normative messages use neighbors as the key reference group (Allcott, 2011).”
InfluentialEnergy Consumption Behaviour During the Energy Transition: Policy Implications from Ukraine
Polyanska, A. S., Babets, D., & Pazynich, Y. (2026) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en19143414 · Cited by 1
Seeding Social Norms About Energy Conservation Among Girl Scouts
Bernstein, D., & Puttick, G. M. (2014) · Applied Environmental Education & Communication · doi:10.1080/1533015x.2014.961887 · Cited by 1
“While the impact of SNM on conservation behavior of adults has been widely studied (e.g., Allcott, 2011), we are not aware of any studies to date that have included youth.”
BackgroundResultEnergy-efficient municipal heating: preliminary lessons from Beijing, Kathmandu and Edinburgh
Gippner, O., Dhakal, S., & Sovacool, B. K. (2011) · International Journal of Ambient Energy · doi:10.1080/01430750.2011.619883 · Cited by 1
On the Effect of Social Norms to Reduce PollutionPreprint
Mantovani, A., Tarola, O., & Vergari, C. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.6092/unibo/amsacta/4039 · Cited by 1
“In order to motivate our approach, we start by considering the positional content of environmentally friendly products vs. brown alternatives (Goldstein et al. 2008; Allcott, 2011).”
MethodMaking Energy Efficiency Pro-Poor
Never, B. (2014) · Cited by 1
Behavioral Economics in Water Management
Correia, R., & Roseta‐Palma, C. (2014) · Cited by 1
Residential Conservation Behaviours and Electricity Load
Tiedemann, K. H. (2015) · doi:10.2316/p.2015.831-006 · Cited by 1
“(3) Commitment refers to the customer’s acting to undertake an energy saving action or behavior, which may include the frequency with”
BackgroundMethodHome Energy Report Programs: Power from the People
Agnew, K., Rosenberg, M., & Wilhelm, B. (2012) · Cited by 1
Sonnenschein, J. (2016) · Lund University Publications (Lund University) · Cited by 2
Using behavioural insights for citizen compliance and cooperation
John, P. C., & Robb, J. (2017) · Evidence Base · doi:10.21307/eb-2017-001 · Cited by 1
“…al 1982); (Midden et al 1983); (Katzev and Johnson, 1984); (Brandon and Lewis 1999); (Matsukawa 2004); (Hydro One Networks 2006); Goldstein 2007; (Green 2008); (Allcott 2011); Alahmad et al 2012; (Allcott and Rogers 2012); (Costa and Kahn 2013)—see also meta-analysis by (Abrahamse and Steg 2013).”
BackgroundDeriving Age Diverse Personas from a Participatory Design Study on Home Electricity Feedback
Dodge, J. E., Hilton, M. L., Metoyer, R., et al. (2017) · doi:10.1145/3027063.3053354 · Cited by 1
“First, we sought a great deal of new sources to augment the data from our workshops, focusing on demographic data sources [12], and behavioral studies [3, 17].”
BackgroundDemarque, C., & Lima, M. L. (2017) · PsyEcology Bilingual Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1080/21711976.2017.1363132 · Cited by 1
“Por ejemplo, el estudio de Allcott (2011) en una muestra de 300,000 hogares, a través de la retroalimentación sobre normas prescriptivas y descriptivas, logró una reducción media de un 2% en el consumo de energía.”
BackgroundSoziale Normen als Instrument des Nudgings: Ein Experiment
Michel, C., & Schneider, J. (2018) · Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung · doi:10.3790/vjh.87.1.119 · Cited by 1
Demand-side Interventions to Promote Residential Energy Conservation
Rundhammer, F. (2018) · Digital Archive @ GSU · doi:10.57709/12259715 · Cited by 1
Charitable giving when donors are constrained to give a minimum amount
Cartwright, E. J., & Mirza, Z. (2019) · Oxford Economic Papers · doi:10.1093/oep/gpz063 · Cited by 1
Using Incentives and Social Information to Promote Energy Conservation Behavior
Brock, M., & Borzino, N. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-6093-4_8-1 · Cited by 2
Encouraging Energy Efficiency Among Residents of Smart and Green Buildings
Flambard, V., Kpoviessi, J. M., & Romaniuc, R. (2021) · Lecture notes in information systems and organisation · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-60607-7_9 · Cited by 1
Costas-Pérez, E., & Tucat, P. (2021) · Gestión y Análisis de Políticas Públicas · doi:10.24965/gapp.i25.10868 · Cited by 7
“Esta estrategia ha sido eficaz para mejorar la eficiencia en el consumo energético de los hogares (Allcott, 2011; Schultz et al., 2007).”
BackgroundThe Influence of Social Capital on Pro-environmental Behavior of Individuals
Kudryavtseva, O., Kulikov, P., Kulikova, A., & Fokina, V. (2021) · Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics Electronic Journal · doi:10.38050/2078-3809-2021-13-1-52-81 · Cited by 1
The Power of Information: Information, Leak Notices, and Water Conservation in Edina, MN
Chung, F. (2021) · HIMALAYA · Cited by 1
Tomio, A. A., Dottori, M., Hesse, E., Torrente, F. M., Flichtentrei, D., & Ibáñez, A. M. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047925 · Cited by 1
Nudges e paternalismo libertário: apontamentos sobre questões emergentes
da Rocha, C. A. A. (2022) · Revista Brasileira de Terapia Comportamental e Cognitiva · doi:10.31505/rbtcc.v23i1.1525 · Cited by 2
Werth, L., Seibt, B., & Mayer, J. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-53899-9_2 · Cited by 1
Shifting Household Energy Use in Bangalore, India: Using Behaviorally Informed Energy Reports
Hernandez, M., Bhagavatula, K., Cibi, S., Ravichandran, K., Krishnan, S., Malaviya, S., & Jairaj, B. (2022) · doi:10.46830/wriwp.20.00046 · Cited by 2
“There is evidence that taxes on consumption must be relatively high to change behavior; some research indicates that achieving a 2 percent reduction in household energy use requires raising energy prices by 11 to 20 percent, making them expensive for consumers and subject to public pushback (Allcott 2011).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAdaptive design, adaptive interventions
Bank, W. (2014) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-0342-0_ch11 · Cited by 1
Behavior, decisions and ecological transition: experimental approaches with policy implications
Antonioni, A., Antonio Cabrales, Y., Lipari, F., & Sánchez, A. (2022) · Cuadernos Económicos de ICE · doi:10.32796/cice.2022.104.7505 · Cited by 2
“For example, Allcott and Mullainathan (2010), Allcott (2011), and Allcott and Rogers (2014) show how the power of social comparison in home energy reports (HER) are a cost-effective climate policy intervention to push people towards sustainable energy consumption or providing households with tailored information regar…”
BackgroundInfluentialEnvironmental Status Goods and Market-Based Conservation: An Arm of Ostrom’s Polycentric Approach?
Sanders, S. D. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15054167 · Cited by 1
Priming and the value of a statistical life: A cross country comparison
Andersson, H., & Ouvrard, B. (2023) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2023.102013 · Cited by 1
“In a sense, we can make a link with the literature that focuses on the assessment of the e(cid:27)ects of nudges and, in particular, on the e(cid:27)ect of social norm comparisons (Allcott, 2011; Ferraro and Price, 2013; Brent et al., 2015).”
Pro-environmental behavior in sustainable tourism: the impact of using "Environmental feedback"
Nguyễn, L. T. P., Nguyễn, A. M., & Hồ, N. T. H. (2022) · Science & Technology Development Journal - Economics - Law and Management · doi:10.32508/stdjelm.v6i1.822 · Cited by 1
Kendal, R. L., & Watson, R. L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198869252.013.14 · Cited by 6
da Cunha, J. A. O. G., Araujo, I., & Gomes, V. H. D. S. (2022) · iSys - Brazilian Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.5753/isys.2022.2275 · Cited by 1
Kong, X., Yue, C., & Lai, Y. (2023) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-023-09854-w · Cited by 1
“Allcott (2011), Ferraro and Price (2013), and Allcott and Kessler (2019) found preferences for inequity-aver-sion promote energy and water conservation.”
An Exploratory Analysis for Household Energy Consumption and Conservation
Reyes, P. M. G., & Quevedo, V. C. (2021) · International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM) · doi:10.46254/an11.20210190 · Cited by 1
Czap, N. V., Czap, H., & Miteza, I. (2023) · Review of Behavioral Economics · doi:10.1561/105.00000175 · Cited by 1
Effect of information provision by familial nudging on attitudes toward offshore wind power
Komatsu, H., Kubota, H., Asano, K., et al. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0297199 · Cited by 1
Contagion, fast and low: Modeling social influence in socio-ecological systems
Lopolito, A., Caferra, R., & Morone, P. (2024) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110673 · Cited by 1
Are Social Comparison Reports Effective in Transition Economies? Evidence from a Field Experiment
Sargsyan, Y., Turdaliev, S., & Koten, S. V. (2024) · Springer proceedings in business and economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-62998-3_8 · Cited by 1
Behavioral Economics and Its Applications for Energy Consumption
Ida, T., & Ushifusa, Y. (2024) · Evolutionary economics and social complexity science · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-4434-3_7 · Cited by 1
Impacts of User Behaviour and Social Networks on Residential Energy Savings: A Review
Du, F., & Yue, H. (2024) · International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC) · doi:10.1109/icac61394.2024.10718786 · Cited by 1
“OPOWER, for instance, uses data analytics and social comparisons to motivate energy-saving actions across neighborhoods, leading to savings of up to 14% [27; 28].”
BackgroundDynamic policy in the presence of social norms
Hintermann, B., & Lange, A. (2024) · Journal of Public Economic Theory · doi:10.1111/jpet.70001 · Cited by 2
Curley, C., Xu, C. K., Orlove, B., Forster, H. A., & Harrison, N. (2024) · Environmental Policy and Governance · doi:10.1002/eet.2137 · Cited by 1
Expressed disapproval does not sustain long-term cooperation as effectively as costly punishment
Sparks, A. M., Burleigh, T. J., & Barclay, P. (2024) · Evolutionary Human Sciences · doi:10.1017/ehs.2024.41 · Cited by 2
“…not rely solely on disapproval or negative feedback, like verbal scold-ings, frowning emoticons or comparing their cooperative behaviour unfavourably with that of others (e.g. feedback on energy bills comparing their usage with the average; Allcott, 2011; Ayres et al., 2013; Schulz et al., 2007).”
Neighbors matter for risk tolerance
Bertrand, J., Broihanne, M., Orkut, H., & Weill, L. (2025) · European Journal of Finance · doi:10.1080/1351847x.2025.2473368 · Cited by 1
“Another pathway is social norms, which are established within a community through repeated interactions and shared attitudes (Allcott 2011).”
Deng, Y., & Li, H. (2025) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2025.135631 · Cited by 2
Dannenberg, A. (2025) · Water Economics and Policy · doi:10.1142/s2382624x25710018 · Cited by 1
Sabato, H. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0321547 · Cited by 1
“Both descriptive and injunctive norms are known to have a significant effect on behavioral decisions in various life domains (such as college drinking [12], energy saving [13], water use [14]), including prosocial inclinations (such as cooperation [15], tipping behavior [16]).”
Do Consumers Distinguish Fixed Cost from Variable Cost? “Schmeduling” in Two-Part Tariffs in Energy
Ito, K., & Zhang, S. (2025) · American Economic Journal Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.20230613 · Cited by 1
“For example, the effects of non-price energy conservation programs such as home energy reports with peer comparisons usually produced 1-2% reductions in residential energy usage (Allcott, 2011).”
Do giving voice and social information help in revising a misconception about rent–control?
Brandts, J., Busom, I., & López-Mayán, C. (2025) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2025.102374 · Cited by 1
Li, S., Yang, C., & Zhai, G. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1430125 · Cited by 2
“…reuse (Goldstein et al., 2008), charitable donation (Shang and Croson, 2009), voting (Gerber and Rogers, 2009), contributions to online communities (Allcott, 2011), household energy saving (Allcott and Rogers, 2014), water conservation (Ferraro and Price, 2013; Jaime Torres and Carlsson, 2018),…”
The Hidden Benefits of Corporate Social Responsibility
Grieder, M., Kistler, D., & Schmitz, J. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103225 · Cited by 5
Moving to metrics: Opportunities and challenges of performance-based sustainability standards
Veale, M., & Seixas, R. (2015) · OpenEdition (OpenEdition) · Cited by 1
Graphical Models for Identifying Fraud and Waste in Healthcare Claims
Olsen, P. A., Natarajan, R., & Weiss, S. M. (2014) · SIAM International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1137/1.9781611973440.66 · Cited by 1
“For example, in a different context, electricity utilities often provide such feedback with the monthly utility bills, which have been shown to promote energy conservation [1].”
BackgroundChampioning energy in Pendleton
Sherriff, G., & Martin, P. (2016) · University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford) · Cited by 1
Zaytseva, Y. V. (2016) · R-Economy · doi:10.15826/recon.2016.2.2.023 · Cited by 1
Sustainable Architecture Design: Environmental and Economic Benefits
Babcock, M. (2016) · Digital Commons (Liberty University) · Cited by 1
Teacher Trainees Conceptions of Economic Policy Instruments for the Environment
Beer, D. L. (2018) · Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences) · Cited by 1
Muldoon, R. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93907-0_18 · Cited by 1
Stupsende Agrarpolitik? Nudging zu einernachhaltigen Landwirtschaft
Thomas, F., Koessler, A., & Engel, S. (2018) · Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung · doi:10.3790/vjh.87.2.127 · Cited by 1
Societal appreciation of energy security: Volume 3: Non-household actors (EE, NL and PT)
Giaccaria, S., Efthimiadis, T., Longo, A., et al. (2019) · Joint Research Centre (European Commission) · doi:10.2760/672568 · Cited by 1
Vu, T. H., Tran, D., Goto, D., et al. (2019) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · doi:10.15027/47407 · Cited by 1
THE DYNAMICS OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOR: NOVELTY AND FRAMING EFFECTS
Asensio, O. I., & Delmas, M. A. (2021) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 1
Biases and environmental risks in urban Africa: household solid waste decision-making
Wernstedt, K., Kihila, J. M., & Kaseva, M. E. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2019.1691510 · Cited by 2
“…fields such as economics have addressed behavioral elements of decision-making to improve environmental performance in energy, water, and waste (Allcott 2011; Ferraro and Price 2013; Torres and Carlsson 2016; Nomura, John, and Cotterill 2011), but our study represents the first that we are…”
BackgroundSong, K., Anderson, K., Lee, S. H., et al. (2019) · ASCE International Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering (i3CE) · doi:10.1061/9780784482445.062 · Cited by 1
Promoting Sustainability Culture among Citizens: A System Dynamic Analysis of the Role of Schools
Ricci, E. C. (2020) · puntOorg International Journal · doi:10.19245/25.05.pij.4.2.6 · Cited by 1
Behavioral Study of Demand Response: Web-Based Survey, Field Experiment, and Laboratory Experiment
Ida, T., Ushifusa, Y., Tanaka, K., Murakami, K., & Ishihara, T. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-3576-5_6 · Cited by 1
Kunte, S. (2020) · Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik · doi:10.1515/zfwp-2020-2026 · Cited by 3
“…verbrauchen (soziale Vergleiche) 3 Diese Annahme wird durch Befragungen gestützt, in denen die betroffenen Sparer u. a. fehlende Willenskraft als Grund für niedrige Beiträge angeben (Thaler/Benartzi, 2004). den Verbrauch zumindest in einem gewissen Maße reduzieren können (Allcott, 2011).”
BackgroundAdekanye, O., Davis, A. L., & Azevedo, I. L. (2021) · Environmental Research Communications · doi:10.1088/2515-7620/abddc7 · Cited by 1
Zaytseva, Y. V. (2016) · Economy of Regions · doi:10.17059/2016-2-7 · Cited by 1
Smart Cities Consumers in Search of the Potential Sustainability
Villa-Arrieta, M., & Sumper, A. (2021) · Future city · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85566-6_3 · Cited by 1
In-home Behavioral Observation Employing IoT Sensors
Hattori, S., Miura, T., Ichikawa, R., & Sawai, D. (2022) · IEEJ Transactions on Electronics Information and Systems · doi:10.1541/ieejeiss.142.206 · Cited by 1
The Effects of Upward and Downward Social Comparisons on Energy Consumption Behavior
Goette, L. F., Jiang, Z., Schmitz, J., & Schubert, R. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-9287-4_9 · Cited by 1
Driving Green Marketing in a Developing Country
Pandey, S., & Chawla, D. (2019) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-7915-1.ch052 · Cited by 1
Döring, T. F. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-38163-9_5 · Cited by 1
GREEN TRANSITION – CHANGING THINKING PATTERNS AND ACTIONS IN PRACTICE
Ekström, M., & Hytönen, K. (2022) · ICERI proceedings · doi:10.21125/iceri.2022.0061 · Cited by 1
“Studies show that peer influence and social norms can be influential in decreasing the energy consumption of households ([4], [5]), increase recycling [6] and increase the use of sustainable transport options instead of using a private vehicle for commuting purposes [7].”
Social comparison with ambiguity: An investment and consumption game
Sun, Y., & Zhang, S. (2023) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111259 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Allcott, H.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Allcott, Hunt
- Venue
- Journal of Public Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 9-10
- Pages
- 1082-1095
- ISSN
- 0047-2727 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139035425
- Cited by
- 2,802
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2026: 225 · 2025: 209 · 2024: 194 · 2023: 208 · 2022: 226 · 2021: 257 · 2020: 225 · 2019: 240 · 2018: 199 · 2017: 171 · 2016: 165 · 2015: 161 · 2014: 147 · 2013: 94 · 2012: 55
- FWCI
- 263.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Public Economics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Keywords
- social norms, energy conservation, social comparison, residential electricity consumption, cost-effectiveness, injunctive norms, descriptive norms, treatment effect heterogeneity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review