Cited by 798Social and Intergroup PsychologyLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyNames, Identity, and Discrimination Research

Durably reducing transphobia: A field experiment on door-to-door canvassing

Open access
Broockman, David, Kalla, Joshua·2016·Science

Abstract

Not just turnout, but turnaround matters: In the last several U.S. presidential elections, the campaign mantra has focused on making sure that voters already aligned with one's candidate do get out to vote. There is a long history of unsuccessful efforts to change people's attitudes. Nevertheless, Broockman and Kalla conducted a field experiment showing that Miami voters shifted their attitudes toward transgender individuals and maintained those changed positions for 3 months (see the Perspective by Paluck). Science , this issue p. 220 ; see also p. 147

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aad9713

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Narratives about marginalized groups, such as struggle-oriented stories about immigrants, can counteract system justification tendencies that might otherwise discount or disparage immigrants' experiences.

    “narratives about marginalized groups, such as struggle-oriented stories about immigrants, can counteract system justification tendencies that might otherwise discount or disparage immigrants’ experiences293–295.”

    From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [293]

    The intervention description (page unavailable) says canvassers used voters’ own experiences of being judged to encourage perspective-taking, and the paper reports reduced prejudice toward transgender people. The discussion says whether the findings extend to other outgroups remains open. The paper does not establish an effect of immigrant struggle narratives or show that the intervention counteracts system justification tendencies. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Positive interpersonal contact can have a powerful effect on attitudes, even in the case of a single brief interaction.

    “positive interpersonal contact can have a powerful effect on attitudes (23–25), even in the case of a single brief interaction (26).”
  • These changes were present for Democratic and Republican voters and conversations were effective with both transgender and non-transgender canvassers.

    “Importantly, these changes were present for Democratic and Republican voters and conversations were effective with both transgender and non-transgender canvassers.”
  • In that study, the intervention led to substantial reductions in prejudice against transgender people and increases in support for a law that would protect transgender individuals from discrimination.

    “The study found that this intervention led to substantial reductions in prejudice against transgender people and increases in support for a law that would protect transgender individuals from discrimination.”
  • The effects were still evident three months after the intervention.

    “Moreover, the effects were still evident three months after the intervention.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. G. S. Wig et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 18555-18560 (2008).
  2. T. E. Behrens, H. Johansen-Berg, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360, 903-911 (2005).
  3. S. M. Smith et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 13040-13045 (2009).
  4. American Psychological Association, Declaration for the UN World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia, and Related Intolerance (2001; www.apa.org/pi/ oema/programs/racism/apa-delegation-report.pdf).
  5. R. D. Enos, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 3699-3704 (2014).
  6. E. L. Paluck et al., PLOS ONE 10, e0138610 (2015).
  7. S. W. Cook, in Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, W. J. Arnold, D. Levine, Eds. (Univ. of Nebraska Press, 1969), pp. 179-236.
  8. R. E. Petty, C. P. Haugtvedt, S. M. Smith, in Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences, R. E. Petty, J. A. Krosnick, Eds. (Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1995), pp. 93-130.
  9. M. McNutt, Science 348, 1100 (2015).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Broockman, D., & Kalla, J.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Broockman, David
Venue
Science
Published
2016-04-08
Volume
352
Issue
6282
Pages
220-224
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2323368791
Cited by
798
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 110 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 143 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 1
FWCI
251.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Gill Foundation
  • National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Keywords
transphobia, prejudice reduction, perspective taking, door-to-door canvassing, homophobia, voter attitudes, counterargument, intervention durability, South Florida
MeSH terms
Female, Florida, Humans, Male, Politics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Random Allocation, Transgender Persons, Homophobia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review