Cited by 398Digital Marketing and Social MediaConsumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceConsumer Retail Behavior Studies

Way to success: Understanding top streamer's popularity and influence from the perspective of source characteristics

Guo, Yuanyuan, Zhang, Kexin, Wang, Chaoyou·2022·Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102786

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Guo, Y., Zhang, K., & Wang, C.
Affiliations
  • Dalian Maritime University (CN)
  • Southwestern University of Finance and Economics (CN)
  • Dongbei University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Chaoyou
Venue
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
64
Pages
102786
ISSN
0969-6989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3205350297
Cited by
398
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 75 · 2025: 129 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 23
FWCI
61.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
Keywords
live streaming e-commerce, consumer purchase intention, hedonic value, utilitarian value, expertise, streamer attractiveness, humor, passion, warmth, communication styles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review