Cited by 106Personality Traits and PsychologyPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preschool personality antecedents of narcissism in adolescence and young adulthood: A 20-year longitudinal study

Open access
Carlson, Kevin S., Gjerde, Per F.·2009·Journal of Research in Personality

Abstract

This prospective study examined relations between preschool personality attributes and narcissism during adolescence and emerging adulthood. We created five a priori preschool scales anticipated to foretell future narcissism. Independent assessors evaluated the participants' personality at ages 14, 18, and 23. Based upon these evaluations, we generated observer-based narcissism scales for each of these three ages. All preschool scales predicted subsequent narcissism, except Interpersonal Antagonism at age 23. According to mean scale and item scores analyses, narcissism increased significantly from age 14 to 18, followed by a slight but non-significant decline from age 18 to 23. The discussion focused on a developmental view of narcissism, the need for research on automatic processing and psychological defenses, and links between narcissism and attachment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.03.003

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 95 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.), Washington, DC.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 106

Metadata

Authors
Carlson, K. S., & Gjerde, P. F.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Corresponding author
Gjerde, Per F.
Venue
Journal of Research in Personality
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-08
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
570-578
ISSN
0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046988008
Cited by
106
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH016080)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
narcissism, personality development, adolescence, emerging adulthood, developmental trajectories, attachment, automatic processing, defense mechanisms, longitudinal prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review