Cited by 103Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessHuman Behavior and Motivation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Goal conflict and psychological well-being: a meta-analysis.

Gray, Jacob S., Ozer, Daniel J., Rosenthal, Robert·2017·Journal of Research in Personality

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrp.2016.12.003

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 98 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kelly, 1955, Vol. 1
  2. Rosenthal, 1991, Vol. 6

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 103

Metadata

Authors
Gray, J. S., Ozer, D. J., & Rosenthal, R.
Affiliations
University of California, Riverside (US)
Corresponding author
Gray, Jacob S.
Venue
Journal of Research in Personality
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
66
Pages
27-37
ISSN
0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2561203099
Cited by
103
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Behavior and Motivation
Keywords
goal conflict, psychological well-being, psychological distress, motivation, student samples

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review