Cited by 53Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesMotor Control and AdaptationMuscle activation and electromyography studies

Corticomotor excitability during precision motor tasks

Open access
Pearce, Alan J., Kidgell, Dawson J.·2009·Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

Abstract

The aim of this preliminary study was to investigate motor cortex (cortical) excitability between a similar fine visuomotor task of varying difficulty. Ten healthy adults (three female, seven male; 20-45 years of age) participated in the study. Participants were instructed to perform a fine visuomotor task by statically abducting their first index finger against a force transducer which displayed the level of force (represented as a marker) on a computer monitor. This marker was to be maintained between two stationary bars, also displayed on the computer monitor. The level of difficulty was increased by amplifying the position of the marker, making the task more difficult to control. Cortical measures of motor evoked potential (MEP) and silent period (SP) duration in first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle were obtained using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) while the participant maintained the "easy" or "difficult" static task. An 11.8% increase in MEP amplitude was observed when subjects undertook the "difficult" task, but no differences in MEP latency or SP duration. The results from this preliminary study suggest that cortical excitability increases reflect the demand required to perform tasks requiring greater precision with suggestions for further research discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsams.2007.12.005

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Attention and task difficulty are known non-specific modulators of corticospinal excitability and plasticity.

    “Indeed, non-specific factors such as attention and task difficulty are known to modulate corticospinal excitability and plasticity (Beck and Hallett, 2010; Conte et al., 2007; Pearce and Kidgell, 2009; Stefan et al., 2004).”

    From To imitate or not: Avoiding imitation involves preparatory inhibition of motor resonance (2014) · cites this paper as Pearce and Kidgell, 2009

    The Results and Discussion (page numbers not provided) show that the more difficult precision task increased motor-evoked-potential amplitude, supporting task difficulty as a modulator of cortical excitability. The paper does not establish attention as a modulator, and it proposes measuring plasticity in future work rather than demonstrating a plasticity effect. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pearce, A. J., & Kidgell, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Victoria University (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Pearce, Alan J.
Venue
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
280-283
ISSN
1440-2440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074502664
Cited by
53
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of science and medicine in sport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
motor cortex excitability, motor evoked potentials, silent period, first dorsal interosseous muscle, visuomotor control, task difficulty, transcranial magnetic stimulation, finger abduction
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Cortex, Motor Skills, Pilot Projects, Cohort Studies, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review